Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of code-free deep learning for detection and evaluation of posterior capsule opacification

OBJECTIVE: To train and validate a code-free deep learning system (CFDLS) on classifying high-resolution digital retroillumination images of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and to discriminate between clinically significant and non-significant PCOs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: For this retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huemer, Josef, Kronschläger, Martin, Ruiss, Manuel, Sim, Dawn, Keane, Pearse A, Findl, Oliver, Wagner, Siegfried K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-000992
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To train and validate a code-free deep learning system (CFDLS) on classifying high-resolution digital retroillumination images of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and to discriminate between clinically significant and non-significant PCOs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: For this retrospective registry study, three expert observers graded two independent datasets of 279 images three separate times with no PCO to severe PCO, providing binary labels for clinical significance. The CFDLS was trained and internally validated using 179 images of a training dataset and externally validated with 100 images. Model development was through Google Cloud AutoML Vision. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were assessed using Fleiss kappa (κ) coefficients and model performance through sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Intraobserver variability κ values for observers 1, 2 and 3 were 0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.95), 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.97) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.93). Interobserver agreement was high, ranging from 0.85 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.90) between observers 1 and 2 to 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.94) for observers 1 and 3. On internal validation, the AUC of the CFDLS was 0.99 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.0); sensitivity was 0.89 at a specificity of 1. On external validation, the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99); sensitivity was 0.84 and specificity was 0.92. CONCLUSION: This CFDLS provides highly accurate discrimination between clinically significant and non-significant PCO equivalent to human expert graders. The clinical value as a potential decision support tool in different models of care warrants further research.