Cargando…

Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients

IMPORTANCE: Patients aged 80 years and older were often excluded or underrepresented in pivotal endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) trials. Accordingly, trends in frequency, outcomes, and disparities of EVT use merit close analysis. OBJECTIVE: To delineate temporal trends in EVT use, outcomes, and dispa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adcock, Amelia K., Schwamm, Lee H., Smith, Eric E., Fonarow, Gregg C., Reeves, Mathew J., Xu, Haolin, Matsouaka, Roland A., Xian, Ying, Saver, Jeffrey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15869
_version_ 1784722377530146816
author Adcock, Amelia K.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Smith, Eric E.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Reeves, Mathew J.
Xu, Haolin
Matsouaka, Roland A.
Xian, Ying
Saver, Jeffrey L.
author_facet Adcock, Amelia K.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Smith, Eric E.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Reeves, Mathew J.
Xu, Haolin
Matsouaka, Roland A.
Xian, Ying
Saver, Jeffrey L.
author_sort Adcock, Amelia K.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Patients aged 80 years and older were often excluded or underrepresented in pivotal endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) trials. Accordingly, trends in frequency, outcomes, and disparities of EVT use merit close analysis. OBJECTIVE: To delineate temporal trends in EVT use, outcomes, and disparities among patients with acute ischemic stroke aged 80 years and older vs those younger than 80 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A US nationwide retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data was conducted in patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke between April 1, 2012, and June 30, 2019. Data were obtained from hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines–Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) program, which is a stroke quality improvement registry, with data collected prospectively, sponsored by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Data analysis was conducted from November 2, 2020, to June 25, 2021. EXPOSURES: Potentially eligible for EVT based on arrival within 6 hours and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score greater than or equal to 6. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Efficacy outcomes included discharge to home, independent ambulation at discharge, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at discharge. Safety outcomes included in-hospital mortality, combined in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: Among 302 965 patients with ischemic stroke meeting study criteria as potentially eligible for EVT admitted to 614 GWTG-Stroke hospitals, 14.0% (42 422) received EVT (21 634 women [51.0%]), including 10.7% (12 768 of 119 453) of patients aged 80 years and older (median [IQR] age, 85 [82-89] years) and 16.2% (29 654 of 183 512) of patients younger than 80 years (median [IQR] age, 65 [56-73] years). Among patients aged 80 years and older, EVT rates increased substantially during the study period, from 3.3% in early 2012 to 20.8% in early 2019. By study end, the relative rate of EVT among eligible patients aged 80 years and older compared with those younger than 80 years increased from 0.49 (3.3% vs 6.7%) to 0.76 (20.8% vs 27.3%). Older patients had worse outcomes at discharge compared with younger patients, including discharge to home: 12.5% vs 31.1% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.40-0.46), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2): 10.9% vs 26.6% (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.41-0.49), and inpatient death or discharge to hospice, 34.5% vs 16.1% (aOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 2.09-2.36). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates did not differ significantly (6.9% vs 6.5%; aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, use of EVT among individuals aged 80 years and older increased substantially from 2012 to 2019, although the rate remained lower than in younger patients. Although favorable functional outcomes at discharge were lower and combined mortality or discharge to hospice was higher in the older patients, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was not increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9175073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91750732022-06-16 Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients Adcock, Amelia K. Schwamm, Lee H. Smith, Eric E. Fonarow, Gregg C. Reeves, Mathew J. Xu, Haolin Matsouaka, Roland A. Xian, Ying Saver, Jeffrey L. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Patients aged 80 years and older were often excluded or underrepresented in pivotal endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) trials. Accordingly, trends in frequency, outcomes, and disparities of EVT use merit close analysis. OBJECTIVE: To delineate temporal trends in EVT use, outcomes, and disparities among patients with acute ischemic stroke aged 80 years and older vs those younger than 80 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A US nationwide retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data was conducted in patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke between April 1, 2012, and June 30, 2019. Data were obtained from hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines–Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) program, which is a stroke quality improvement registry, with data collected prospectively, sponsored by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Data analysis was conducted from November 2, 2020, to June 25, 2021. EXPOSURES: Potentially eligible for EVT based on arrival within 6 hours and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score greater than or equal to 6. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Efficacy outcomes included discharge to home, independent ambulation at discharge, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at discharge. Safety outcomes included in-hospital mortality, combined in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: Among 302 965 patients with ischemic stroke meeting study criteria as potentially eligible for EVT admitted to 614 GWTG-Stroke hospitals, 14.0% (42 422) received EVT (21 634 women [51.0%]), including 10.7% (12 768 of 119 453) of patients aged 80 years and older (median [IQR] age, 85 [82-89] years) and 16.2% (29 654 of 183 512) of patients younger than 80 years (median [IQR] age, 65 [56-73] years). Among patients aged 80 years and older, EVT rates increased substantially during the study period, from 3.3% in early 2012 to 20.8% in early 2019. By study end, the relative rate of EVT among eligible patients aged 80 years and older compared with those younger than 80 years increased from 0.49 (3.3% vs 6.7%) to 0.76 (20.8% vs 27.3%). Older patients had worse outcomes at discharge compared with younger patients, including discharge to home: 12.5% vs 31.1% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.40-0.46), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2): 10.9% vs 26.6% (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.41-0.49), and inpatient death or discharge to hospice, 34.5% vs 16.1% (aOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 2.09-2.36). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates did not differ significantly (6.9% vs 6.5%; aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, use of EVT among individuals aged 80 years and older increased substantially from 2012 to 2019, although the rate remained lower than in younger patients. Although favorable functional outcomes at discharge were lower and combined mortality or discharge to hospice was higher in the older patients, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was not increased. American Medical Association 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175073/ /pubmed/35671055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15869 Text en Copyright 2022 Adcock AK et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Adcock, Amelia K.
Schwamm, Lee H.
Smith, Eric E.
Fonarow, Gregg C.
Reeves, Mathew J.
Xu, Haolin
Matsouaka, Roland A.
Xian, Ying
Saver, Jeffrey L.
Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients
title Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients
title_full Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients
title_fullStr Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients
title_short Trends in Use, Outcomes, and Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy in US Patients With Stroke Aged 80 Years and Older Compared With Younger Patients
title_sort trends in use, outcomes, and disparities in endovascular thrombectomy in us patients with stroke aged 80 years and older compared with younger patients
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15869
work_keys_str_mv AT adcockameliak trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT schwammleeh trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT smitherice trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT fonarowgreggc trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT reevesmathewj trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT xuhaolin trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT matsouakarolanda trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT xianying trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients
AT saverjeffreyl trendsinuseoutcomesanddisparitiesinendovascularthrombectomyinuspatientswithstrokeaged80yearsandoldercomparedwithyoungerpatients