Cargando…
Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are widely used in the treatment of coronary heart disease, but the best revascularization method for multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) patients is still controversial. Hybrid coronary revasculari...
Autores principales: | Yu, Li, Zhu, Keying, Du, Nannan, Si, Yuexiu, Liang, Jiali, Shen, Ruijing, Chen, Bangsheng |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01903-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Zhu, Peng, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
por: Li, Dongjie, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Diabetics with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: The Korean Multicenter Revascularization Registry (KORR)
por: Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Hybrid coronary revascularization vs. percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease
por: Hannan, Edward L., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Reynolds, Alexander C., et al.
Publicado: (2018)