Cargando…
An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction can lead to malignant arrhythmia, heart failure, and sudden death. Clinical studies have shown that early identification of and timely intervention for acute MI can significantly reduce mortality. The traditional MI risk assessment models are subjective, and the dat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04761-4 |
_version_ | 1784722435439853568 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Ran Wang, Miye Zheng, Tao Zhang, Rui Li, Nan Chen, Zhongxiu Yan, Hongmei Shi, Qingke |
author_facet | Liu, Ran Wang, Miye Zheng, Tao Zhang, Rui Li, Nan Chen, Zhongxiu Yan, Hongmei Shi, Qingke |
author_sort | Liu, Ran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction can lead to malignant arrhythmia, heart failure, and sudden death. Clinical studies have shown that early identification of and timely intervention for acute MI can significantly reduce mortality. The traditional MI risk assessment models are subjective, and the data that go into them are difficult to obtain. Generally, the assessment is only conducted among high-risk patient groups. OBJECTIVE: To construct an artificial intelligence–based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction (MI) for continuous and active monitoring of inpatients, especially those in noncardiovascular departments, and early warning of MI. METHODS: The imbalanced data contain 59 features, which were constructed into a specific dataset through proportional division, upsampling, downsampling, easy ensemble, and w-easy ensemble. Then, the dataset was traversed using supervised machine learning, with recursive feature elimination as the top-layer algorithm and random forest, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), logistic regression, and support vector machine as the bottom-layer algorithms, to select the best model out of many through a variety of evaluation indices. RESULTS: GBDT was the best bottom-layer algorithm, and downsampling was the best dataset construction method. In the validation set, the F1 score and accuracy of the 24-feature downsampling GBDT model were both 0.84. In the test set, the F1 score and accuracy of the 24-feature downsampling GBDT model were both 0.83, and the area under the curve was 0.91. CONCLUSION: Compared with traditional models, artificial intelligence–based machine learning models have better accuracy and real-time performance and can reduce the occurrence of in-hospital MI from a data-driven perspective, thereby increasing the cure rate of patients and improving their prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9175344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91753442022-06-09 An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction Liu, Ran Wang, Miye Zheng, Tao Zhang, Rui Li, Nan Chen, Zhongxiu Yan, Hongmei Shi, Qingke BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction can lead to malignant arrhythmia, heart failure, and sudden death. Clinical studies have shown that early identification of and timely intervention for acute MI can significantly reduce mortality. The traditional MI risk assessment models are subjective, and the data that go into them are difficult to obtain. Generally, the assessment is only conducted among high-risk patient groups. OBJECTIVE: To construct an artificial intelligence–based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction (MI) for continuous and active monitoring of inpatients, especially those in noncardiovascular departments, and early warning of MI. METHODS: The imbalanced data contain 59 features, which were constructed into a specific dataset through proportional division, upsampling, downsampling, easy ensemble, and w-easy ensemble. Then, the dataset was traversed using supervised machine learning, with recursive feature elimination as the top-layer algorithm and random forest, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), logistic regression, and support vector machine as the bottom-layer algorithms, to select the best model out of many through a variety of evaluation indices. RESULTS: GBDT was the best bottom-layer algorithm, and downsampling was the best dataset construction method. In the validation set, the F1 score and accuracy of the 24-feature downsampling GBDT model were both 0.84. In the test set, the F1 score and accuracy of the 24-feature downsampling GBDT model were both 0.83, and the area under the curve was 0.91. CONCLUSION: Compared with traditional models, artificial intelligence–based machine learning models have better accuracy and real-time performance and can reduce the occurrence of in-hospital MI from a data-driven perspective, thereby increasing the cure rate of patients and improving their prognosis. BioMed Central 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175344/ /pubmed/35672659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04761-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Ran Wang, Miye Zheng, Tao Zhang, Rui Li, Nan Chen, Zhongxiu Yan, Hongmei Shi, Qingke An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction |
title | An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction |
title_full | An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction |
title_fullStr | An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction |
title_short | An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction |
title_sort | artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04761-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuran anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT wangmiye anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT zhengtao anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT zhangrui anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT linan anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT chenzhongxiu anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT yanhongmei anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT shiqingke anartificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT liuran artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT wangmiye artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT zhengtao artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT zhangrui artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT linan artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT chenzhongxiu artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT yanhongmei artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction AT shiqingke artificialintelligencebasedriskpredictionmodelofmyocardialinfarction |