Cargando…

Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study

BACKGROUND: The use of caesarean section has steadily increased, with Latin America being the region with the highest rates. Multiple factors account for that increase and the Robson classification is appropriate to compare determinants at the clinical level for caesarean section rates over time. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colomar, Mercedes, Colistro, Valentina, Sosa, Claudio, de Francisco, Luis Andres, Betrán, Ana Pilar, Serruya, Suzanne, De Mucio, Bremen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y
_version_ 1784722441010937856
author Colomar, Mercedes
Colistro, Valentina
Sosa, Claudio
de Francisco, Luis Andres
Betrán, Ana Pilar
Serruya, Suzanne
De Mucio, Bremen
author_facet Colomar, Mercedes
Colistro, Valentina
Sosa, Claudio
de Francisco, Luis Andres
Betrán, Ana Pilar
Serruya, Suzanne
De Mucio, Bremen
author_sort Colomar, Mercedes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of caesarean section has steadily increased, with Latin America being the region with the highest rates. Multiple factors account for that increase and the Robson classification is appropriate to compare determinants at the clinical level for caesarean section rates over time. The purpose of this study is to describe the evolution of caesarean section rates by Robson groups in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018 using a country level database. METHODS: We included the records of all women giving birth in Uruguay (pregnancies ≥22 weeks and weights ≥500 g) with valid data in the mode of childbirth recorded in the Perinatal Information System database between 2008 and 2018. Caesarean section rates were calculated by Robson groups for each of the years included, disaggregated by care sector (public/private) and by geographical area (Capital City/Non-Capital), with time trends and their significance analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: Of the total 485,263 births included in this research, the overall caesarean section rate was 43,1%. In 2018, among the groups at lower risk of caesarean section (1 to 4), the highest rates were seen in women in group 2B (98,8%), followed by those in group 4B (97,9%). A significant increase in the number of caesarean sections was seen in groups 2B (97,9 to 98,8%), 3 (8,36 to 11,1%) and 4 (A (22,7 to 26,9%) and B (95,4 to 97,9%) Significant growth was also observed in groups 5 (74,3 to 78,1%), 8 (90,6 to 95,5%), and 10 (39,1 to 46,7%). The private sector had higher rates of caesarean section for all groups throughout the period, except for women in group 9. The private sector in Montevideo presented the highest rates in the groups with the lowest risk of caesarean section (1, 2A, 3 and 4A), followed by the private sector outside of the capital. CONCLUSION: Uruguay is no exception to the increasing caesarean section trend, even in groups of women who have lower risk of requiring caesarean section. The implementation of interventions aimed at reducing caesarean section in the groups with lower obstetric risk in Uruguay is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9175367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91753672022-06-09 Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study Colomar, Mercedes Colistro, Valentina Sosa, Claudio de Francisco, Luis Andres Betrán, Ana Pilar Serruya, Suzanne De Mucio, Bremen BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: The use of caesarean section has steadily increased, with Latin America being the region with the highest rates. Multiple factors account for that increase and the Robson classification is appropriate to compare determinants at the clinical level for caesarean section rates over time. The purpose of this study is to describe the evolution of caesarean section rates by Robson groups in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018 using a country level database. METHODS: We included the records of all women giving birth in Uruguay (pregnancies ≥22 weeks and weights ≥500 g) with valid data in the mode of childbirth recorded in the Perinatal Information System database between 2008 and 2018. Caesarean section rates were calculated by Robson groups for each of the years included, disaggregated by care sector (public/private) and by geographical area (Capital City/Non-Capital), with time trends and their significance analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: Of the total 485,263 births included in this research, the overall caesarean section rate was 43,1%. In 2018, among the groups at lower risk of caesarean section (1 to 4), the highest rates were seen in women in group 2B (98,8%), followed by those in group 4B (97,9%). A significant increase in the number of caesarean sections was seen in groups 2B (97,9 to 98,8%), 3 (8,36 to 11,1%) and 4 (A (22,7 to 26,9%) and B (95,4 to 97,9%) Significant growth was also observed in groups 5 (74,3 to 78,1%), 8 (90,6 to 95,5%), and 10 (39,1 to 46,7%). The private sector had higher rates of caesarean section for all groups throughout the period, except for women in group 9. The private sector in Montevideo presented the highest rates in the groups with the lowest risk of caesarean section (1, 2A, 3 and 4A), followed by the private sector outside of the capital. CONCLUSION: Uruguay is no exception to the increasing caesarean section trend, even in groups of women who have lower risk of requiring caesarean section. The implementation of interventions aimed at reducing caesarean section in the groups with lower obstetric risk in Uruguay is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y. BioMed Central 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175367/ /pubmed/35672663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Colomar, Mercedes
Colistro, Valentina
Sosa, Claudio
de Francisco, Luis Andres
Betrán, Ana Pilar
Serruya, Suzanne
De Mucio, Bremen
Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study
title Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study
title_full Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study
title_fullStr Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study
title_full_unstemmed Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study
title_short Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study
title_sort cesarean section in uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the robson classification. an observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y
work_keys_str_mv AT colomarmercedes cesareansectioninuruguayfrom2008to2018countryanalysisbasedontherobsonclassificationanobservationalstudy
AT colistrovalentina cesareansectioninuruguayfrom2008to2018countryanalysisbasedontherobsonclassificationanobservationalstudy
AT sosaclaudio cesareansectioninuruguayfrom2008to2018countryanalysisbasedontherobsonclassificationanobservationalstudy
AT defranciscoluisandres cesareansectioninuruguayfrom2008to2018countryanalysisbasedontherobsonclassificationanobservationalstudy
AT betrananapilar cesareansectioninuruguayfrom2008to2018countryanalysisbasedontherobsonclassificationanobservationalstudy
AT serruyasuzanne cesareansectioninuruguayfrom2008to2018countryanalysisbasedontherobsonclassificationanobservationalstudy
AT demuciobremen cesareansectioninuruguayfrom2008to2018countryanalysisbasedontherobsonclassificationanobservationalstudy