Cargando…

Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control

BACKGROUND: Toothbrushes require flexibility to access all dental surfaces and remove plaque effectively, but they should also aim to prevent or limit overbrushing and consequent damage to teeth and gums. In two studies, the physical properties and cleaning performance of specialist test toothbrushe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acherkouk, Amina, Götze, Marco, Kiesow, Andreas, Ramakrishnan, Anantha, Sarembe, Sandra, Lang, Tomas, Gaengler, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02211-4
_version_ 1784722459722776576
author Acherkouk, Amina
Götze, Marco
Kiesow, Andreas
Ramakrishnan, Anantha
Sarembe, Sandra
Lang, Tomas
Gaengler, Peter
author_facet Acherkouk, Amina
Götze, Marco
Kiesow, Andreas
Ramakrishnan, Anantha
Sarembe, Sandra
Lang, Tomas
Gaengler, Peter
author_sort Acherkouk, Amina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Toothbrushes require flexibility to access all dental surfaces and remove plaque effectively, but they should also aim to prevent or limit overbrushing and consequent damage to teeth and gums. In two studies, the physical properties and cleaning performance of specialist test toothbrushes with flexible necks were compared to a reference rigid-necked toothbrush. METHODS: In Study 1, a universal testing machine (Instron E 10,000) with a specially designed setup was used to test the deflection behaviour of toothbrush head and neck. Untufted toothbrushes were fixed in a custom holder and force was applied to the head while the deflection was measured. In Study 2, one control and five test toothbrushes were assessed using a robot system to simulate the cleaning of artificial plaque from defined surfaces of artificial replicated human teeth in a model oral cavity (typodonts). RESULTS: Study 1 showed that the flexible-neck toothbrush deflected 2 to 2.5 times more than the rigid-neck reference toothbrush when same force was applied to the toothbrush head. Study 2 revealed that all five test toothbrushes showed statistically superior simulated plaque removal to the reference toothbrush. This superiority was observed for all test toothbrushes employing horizontal and rotating brushing action (all p = 0.001) but only three of the five toothbrushes when vertical brushing was employed (all p = 0.001). Cleaning efficacy of the test toothbrushes was demonstrated both interdentally and at the gumline locations. The Complete Protection toothbrush showed the most effective cleaning performance followed by the Repair and Protect and Rapid Relief toothbrushes. CONCLUSION: The addition of a flexible-neck component to the toothbrush designs helped to reduce stiffness and may allow more effective cleaning compared to rigid designs with controlled force distribution on the teeth and gums. This may help to provide plaque control at all potential risk areas in an in vitro robot model and could support good oral hygiene in-use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02211-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9175444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91754442022-06-09 Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control Acherkouk, Amina Götze, Marco Kiesow, Andreas Ramakrishnan, Anantha Sarembe, Sandra Lang, Tomas Gaengler, Peter BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Toothbrushes require flexibility to access all dental surfaces and remove plaque effectively, but they should also aim to prevent or limit overbrushing and consequent damage to teeth and gums. In two studies, the physical properties and cleaning performance of specialist test toothbrushes with flexible necks were compared to a reference rigid-necked toothbrush. METHODS: In Study 1, a universal testing machine (Instron E 10,000) with a specially designed setup was used to test the deflection behaviour of toothbrush head and neck. Untufted toothbrushes were fixed in a custom holder and force was applied to the head while the deflection was measured. In Study 2, one control and five test toothbrushes were assessed using a robot system to simulate the cleaning of artificial plaque from defined surfaces of artificial replicated human teeth in a model oral cavity (typodonts). RESULTS: Study 1 showed that the flexible-neck toothbrush deflected 2 to 2.5 times more than the rigid-neck reference toothbrush when same force was applied to the toothbrush head. Study 2 revealed that all five test toothbrushes showed statistically superior simulated plaque removal to the reference toothbrush. This superiority was observed for all test toothbrushes employing horizontal and rotating brushing action (all p = 0.001) but only three of the five toothbrushes when vertical brushing was employed (all p = 0.001). Cleaning efficacy of the test toothbrushes was demonstrated both interdentally and at the gumline locations. The Complete Protection toothbrush showed the most effective cleaning performance followed by the Repair and Protect and Rapid Relief toothbrushes. CONCLUSION: The addition of a flexible-neck component to the toothbrush designs helped to reduce stiffness and may allow more effective cleaning compared to rigid designs with controlled force distribution on the teeth and gums. This may help to provide plaque control at all potential risk areas in an in vitro robot model and could support good oral hygiene in-use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02211-4. BioMed Central 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9175444/ /pubmed/35676648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02211-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Acherkouk, Amina
Götze, Marco
Kiesow, Andreas
Ramakrishnan, Anantha
Sarembe, Sandra
Lang, Tomas
Gaengler, Peter
Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control
title Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control
title_full Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control
title_fullStr Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control
title_full_unstemmed Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control
title_short Robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control
title_sort robot and mechanical testing of a specialist manual toothbrush for cleaning efficacy and improved force control
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02211-4
work_keys_str_mv AT acherkoukamina robotandmechanicaltestingofaspecialistmanualtoothbrushforcleaningefficacyandimprovedforcecontrol
AT gotzemarco robotandmechanicaltestingofaspecialistmanualtoothbrushforcleaningefficacyandimprovedforcecontrol
AT kiesowandreas robotandmechanicaltestingofaspecialistmanualtoothbrushforcleaningefficacyandimprovedforcecontrol
AT ramakrishnananantha robotandmechanicaltestingofaspecialistmanualtoothbrushforcleaningefficacyandimprovedforcecontrol
AT sarembesandra robotandmechanicaltestingofaspecialistmanualtoothbrushforcleaningefficacyandimprovedforcecontrol
AT langtomas robotandmechanicaltestingofaspecialistmanualtoothbrushforcleaningefficacyandimprovedforcecontrol
AT gaenglerpeter robotandmechanicaltestingofaspecialistmanualtoothbrushforcleaningefficacyandimprovedforcecontrol