Cargando…

Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments

BACKGROUND: Codes in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), are used for injury surveillance, including surveillance of intentional self-harm, as they appear in administrative billing records. This study estimated the positive predictive valu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabella, Barbara A., Hume, Beth, Li, Linda, Mabida, Marianne, Costich, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y
_version_ 1784722463564759040
author Gabella, Barbara A.
Hume, Beth
Li, Linda
Mabida, Marianne
Costich, Julia
author_facet Gabella, Barbara A.
Hume, Beth
Li, Linda
Mabida, Marianne
Costich, Julia
author_sort Gabella, Barbara A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Codes in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), are used for injury surveillance, including surveillance of intentional self-harm, as they appear in administrative billing records. This study estimated the positive predictive value of ICD-10-CM codes for intentional self-harm in emergency department (ED) billing records for patients aged 10 years and older who did not die and were not admitted to an inpatient medical service. METHODS: The study team in Maryland, Colorado, and Massachusetts selected all or a random sample of ED billing records with an ICD-10-CM code for intentional self-harm (specific codes that began with X71-X83, T36-T65, T71, T14.91). Positive predictive value (PPV) was determined by the number and percentage of records with a physician diagnosis of intentional self-harm, based on a retrospective review of the original medical record. RESULTS: The estimated PPV for the codes’ capture of intentional self-harm based on physician diagnosis in the original medical record was 89.8% (95% CI 85.0–93.4) for Maryland records, 91.9% (95% CI 87.7–95.0) for Colorado records, and 97.3% (95% CI 95.1–98.7) for Massachusetts records. CONCLUSION: Given the high PPV of the codes, epidemiologists can use the codes for public health surveillance of intentional self-harm treated in the ED using ICD-10-CM coded administrative billing records. However, these codes and related variables in the billing database cannot definitively distinguish between suicidal and non-suicidal intentional self-harm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9175468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91754682022-06-09 Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments Gabella, Barbara A. Hume, Beth Li, Linda Mabida, Marianne Costich, Julia Inj Epidemiol Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Codes in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), are used for injury surveillance, including surveillance of intentional self-harm, as they appear in administrative billing records. This study estimated the positive predictive value of ICD-10-CM codes for intentional self-harm in emergency department (ED) billing records for patients aged 10 years and older who did not die and were not admitted to an inpatient medical service. METHODS: The study team in Maryland, Colorado, and Massachusetts selected all or a random sample of ED billing records with an ICD-10-CM code for intentional self-harm (specific codes that began with X71-X83, T36-T65, T71, T14.91). Positive predictive value (PPV) was determined by the number and percentage of records with a physician diagnosis of intentional self-harm, based on a retrospective review of the original medical record. RESULTS: The estimated PPV for the codes’ capture of intentional self-harm based on physician diagnosis in the original medical record was 89.8% (95% CI 85.0–93.4) for Maryland records, 91.9% (95% CI 87.7–95.0) for Colorado records, and 97.3% (95% CI 95.1–98.7) for Massachusetts records. CONCLUSION: Given the high PPV of the codes, epidemiologists can use the codes for public health surveillance of intentional self-harm treated in the ED using ICD-10-CM coded administrative billing records. However, these codes and related variables in the billing database cannot definitively distinguish between suicidal and non-suicidal intentional self-harm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y. BioMed Central 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175468/ /pubmed/35672865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Gabella, Barbara A.
Hume, Beth
Li, Linda
Mabida, Marianne
Costich, Julia
Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
title Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
title_full Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
title_fullStr Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
title_full_unstemmed Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
title_short Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
title_sort multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gabellabarbaraa multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments
AT humebeth multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments
AT lilinda multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments
AT mabidamarianne multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments
AT costichjulia multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments