Cargando…
Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments
BACKGROUND: Codes in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), are used for injury surveillance, including surveillance of intentional self-harm, as they appear in administrative billing records. This study estimated the positive predictive valu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y |
_version_ | 1784722463564759040 |
---|---|
author | Gabella, Barbara A. Hume, Beth Li, Linda Mabida, Marianne Costich, Julia |
author_facet | Gabella, Barbara A. Hume, Beth Li, Linda Mabida, Marianne Costich, Julia |
author_sort | Gabella, Barbara A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Codes in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), are used for injury surveillance, including surveillance of intentional self-harm, as they appear in administrative billing records. This study estimated the positive predictive value of ICD-10-CM codes for intentional self-harm in emergency department (ED) billing records for patients aged 10 years and older who did not die and were not admitted to an inpatient medical service. METHODS: The study team in Maryland, Colorado, and Massachusetts selected all or a random sample of ED billing records with an ICD-10-CM code for intentional self-harm (specific codes that began with X71-X83, T36-T65, T71, T14.91). Positive predictive value (PPV) was determined by the number and percentage of records with a physician diagnosis of intentional self-harm, based on a retrospective review of the original medical record. RESULTS: The estimated PPV for the codes’ capture of intentional self-harm based on physician diagnosis in the original medical record was 89.8% (95% CI 85.0–93.4) for Maryland records, 91.9% (95% CI 87.7–95.0) for Colorado records, and 97.3% (95% CI 95.1–98.7) for Massachusetts records. CONCLUSION: Given the high PPV of the codes, epidemiologists can use the codes for public health surveillance of intentional self-harm treated in the ED using ICD-10-CM coded administrative billing records. However, these codes and related variables in the billing database cannot definitively distinguish between suicidal and non-suicidal intentional self-harm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9175468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91754682022-06-09 Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments Gabella, Barbara A. Hume, Beth Li, Linda Mabida, Marianne Costich, Julia Inj Epidemiol Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Codes in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), are used for injury surveillance, including surveillance of intentional self-harm, as they appear in administrative billing records. This study estimated the positive predictive value of ICD-10-CM codes for intentional self-harm in emergency department (ED) billing records for patients aged 10 years and older who did not die and were not admitted to an inpatient medical service. METHODS: The study team in Maryland, Colorado, and Massachusetts selected all or a random sample of ED billing records with an ICD-10-CM code for intentional self-harm (specific codes that began with X71-X83, T36-T65, T71, T14.91). Positive predictive value (PPV) was determined by the number and percentage of records with a physician diagnosis of intentional self-harm, based on a retrospective review of the original medical record. RESULTS: The estimated PPV for the codes’ capture of intentional self-harm based on physician diagnosis in the original medical record was 89.8% (95% CI 85.0–93.4) for Maryland records, 91.9% (95% CI 87.7–95.0) for Colorado records, and 97.3% (95% CI 95.1–98.7) for Massachusetts records. CONCLUSION: Given the high PPV of the codes, epidemiologists can use the codes for public health surveillance of intentional self-harm treated in the ED using ICD-10-CM coded administrative billing records. However, these codes and related variables in the billing database cannot definitively distinguish between suicidal and non-suicidal intentional self-harm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y. BioMed Central 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175468/ /pubmed/35672865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Gabella, Barbara A. Hume, Beth Li, Linda Mabida, Marianne Costich, Julia Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments |
title | Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments |
title_full | Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments |
title_fullStr | Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments |
title_short | Multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments |
title_sort | multi-site medical record review for validation of intentional self-harm coding in emergency departments |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-022-00380-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gabellabarbaraa multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments AT humebeth multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments AT lilinda multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments AT mabidamarianne multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments AT costichjulia multisitemedicalrecordreviewforvalidationofintentionalselfharmcodinginemergencydepartments |