Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax
BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pneumothorax is common after thoracic procedures. For patients with pneumothorax larger than 15%, simple aspiration is suggested. Although vacuum bottle plus non-tunneled catheter drainage has been performed in many institutions, its safety and efficacy remain to be assessed....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02009-8 |
_version_ | 1784722469720948736 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Shih-Yu Kuo, Yao-Wen Ho, Chao-Chi Wu, Huey-Dong Wang, Hao-Chien |
author_facet | Chen, Shih-Yu Kuo, Yao-Wen Ho, Chao-Chi Wu, Huey-Dong Wang, Hao-Chien |
author_sort | Chen, Shih-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pneumothorax is common after thoracic procedures. For patients with pneumothorax larger than 15%, simple aspiration is suggested. Although vacuum bottle plus non-tunneled catheter drainage has been performed in many institutions, its safety and efficacy remain to be assessed. METHODS: Through this prospective cohort study (NCT03724721), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus non-tunneled catheter drainage. Patients older than 20 years old who developed post-procedural pneumothorax were enrolled. A non-tunneled catheter was placed at the intersection of the midclavicular line and the second intercostal space. A 3-way stopcock, a drainage set, and a digital pressure gauge were connected. The stopcock was manipulated to connect the pleural space to the pressure gauge for measurement of end-expiration intrapleural pressure or to the vacuum bottle for air drainage. The rate of successful drainage, the end-expiration intrapleural pressure before, during, and after the procedure and the duration of hospitalization were recorded. RESULTS: From August 2018 to February 2020, 21 patients underwent vacuum bottle plus catheter drainage (intervention group) and 31 patients received conservative treatment (control group). The end-expiration intrapleural pressure of all patients remained less than − 20 cmH(2)O during drainage. No procedure related complication was observed. Large pneumothorax (≥ 15%) was associated with higher risk of persistent air leak (Odds ratio 12, 95% CI 1.2–569.7). Vacuum bottle assisted air drainage yielded shorter event-free duration than that of conservative treatment (2 days vs 5 days [interquartile range 1–4 days vs 3–7 days], p < .05). Vacuum bottle assisted air drainage also help identifying patients with persistent pneumothorax and necessitate the subsequent management. The event-free duration of persistent air leak in the intervention group was also comparable with that of conservative treatment (5 days vs 5 days [interquartile range 5–8 days vs 3–7 days], p = .45). CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum bottle plus catheter drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax is a safe and efficient procedure. It may be considered as an alternative management of stable post-procedural pneumothorax with size larger than 15%. Trial registration The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital (No. 201805105DINA) on 6th August, 2018. The first participant was enrolled on 23rd August, 2018 after Research Ethics Committee approval. This clinical trial complete registration at U.S. National Library of Medicine clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT03724721 and URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03724721 on 30th October, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02009-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9175504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91755042022-06-09 Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax Chen, Shih-Yu Kuo, Yao-Wen Ho, Chao-Chi Wu, Huey-Dong Wang, Hao-Chien BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pneumothorax is common after thoracic procedures. For patients with pneumothorax larger than 15%, simple aspiration is suggested. Although vacuum bottle plus non-tunneled catheter drainage has been performed in many institutions, its safety and efficacy remain to be assessed. METHODS: Through this prospective cohort study (NCT03724721), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus non-tunneled catheter drainage. Patients older than 20 years old who developed post-procedural pneumothorax were enrolled. A non-tunneled catheter was placed at the intersection of the midclavicular line and the second intercostal space. A 3-way stopcock, a drainage set, and a digital pressure gauge were connected. The stopcock was manipulated to connect the pleural space to the pressure gauge for measurement of end-expiration intrapleural pressure or to the vacuum bottle for air drainage. The rate of successful drainage, the end-expiration intrapleural pressure before, during, and after the procedure and the duration of hospitalization were recorded. RESULTS: From August 2018 to February 2020, 21 patients underwent vacuum bottle plus catheter drainage (intervention group) and 31 patients received conservative treatment (control group). The end-expiration intrapleural pressure of all patients remained less than − 20 cmH(2)O during drainage. No procedure related complication was observed. Large pneumothorax (≥ 15%) was associated with higher risk of persistent air leak (Odds ratio 12, 95% CI 1.2–569.7). Vacuum bottle assisted air drainage yielded shorter event-free duration than that of conservative treatment (2 days vs 5 days [interquartile range 1–4 days vs 3–7 days], p < .05). Vacuum bottle assisted air drainage also help identifying patients with persistent pneumothorax and necessitate the subsequent management. The event-free duration of persistent air leak in the intervention group was also comparable with that of conservative treatment (5 days vs 5 days [interquartile range 5–8 days vs 3–7 days], p = .45). CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum bottle plus catheter drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax is a safe and efficient procedure. It may be considered as an alternative management of stable post-procedural pneumothorax with size larger than 15%. Trial registration The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital (No. 201805105DINA) on 6th August, 2018. The first participant was enrolled on 23rd August, 2018 after Research Ethics Committee approval. This clinical trial complete registration at U.S. National Library of Medicine clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT03724721 and URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03724721 on 30th October, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02009-8. BioMed Central 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175504/ /pubmed/35672758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02009-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Shih-Yu Kuo, Yao-Wen Ho, Chao-Chi Wu, Huey-Dong Wang, Hao-Chien Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax |
title | Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of vacuum bottle plus catheter for drainage of iatrogenic pneumothorax |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02009-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenshihyu safetyandefficacyofvacuumbottlepluscatheterfordrainageofiatrogenicpneumothorax AT kuoyaowen safetyandefficacyofvacuumbottlepluscatheterfordrainageofiatrogenicpneumothorax AT hochaochi safetyandefficacyofvacuumbottlepluscatheterfordrainageofiatrogenicpneumothorax AT wuhueydong safetyandefficacyofvacuumbottlepluscatheterfordrainageofiatrogenicpneumothorax AT wanghaochien safetyandefficacyofvacuumbottlepluscatheterfordrainageofiatrogenicpneumothorax |