Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND: Traditional bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include doses of thalidomide up to 200 mg/day (VTd‐label). Clinical practice has evolved to use a lower dose (100 mg/day) to reduce toxicity (VTd‐mod), which wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreau, Philippe, Hulin, Cyrille, Zweegman, Sonja, Hashim, Mahmoud, Hu, Yannan, Heeg, Bart, de Boer, Carla, Vanquickelberghe, Veronique, Kampfenkel, Tobias, He, Jianming, Lam, Annette, Cote, Sarah, Sonneveld, Pieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.129
_version_ 1784722504544157696
author Moreau, Philippe
Hulin, Cyrille
Zweegman, Sonja
Hashim, Mahmoud
Hu, Yannan
Heeg, Bart
de Boer, Carla
Vanquickelberghe, Veronique
Kampfenkel, Tobias
He, Jianming
Lam, Annette
Cote, Sarah
Sonneveld, Pieter
author_facet Moreau, Philippe
Hulin, Cyrille
Zweegman, Sonja
Hashim, Mahmoud
Hu, Yannan
Heeg, Bart
de Boer, Carla
Vanquickelberghe, Veronique
Kampfenkel, Tobias
He, Jianming
Lam, Annette
Cote, Sarah
Sonneveld, Pieter
author_sort Moreau, Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include doses of thalidomide up to 200 mg/day (VTd‐label). Clinical practice has evolved to use a lower dose (100 mg/day) to reduce toxicity (VTd‐mod), which was evaluated in the phase III CASSIOPEIA study, without or with daratumumab (D‐VTd; an anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody). We used propensity score matching to compare efficacy and safety for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd with VTd‐label. METHODS: Patient‐level data for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd from CASSIOPEIA (NCT02541383) and data for VTd‐label from the PETHEMA/GEM study (NCT00461747) were analyzed. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression, and nearest‐neighbor matching procedure was used. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), postinduction and posttransplant responses, as well as rate of treatment discontinuation and grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and overall response rate (ORR). VTd‐mod was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR versus VTd‐label. VTd‐mod safety was not superior to VTd‐label despite the lower thalidomide dose. D‐VTd was significantly better than VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction and posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR, and was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In transplant‐eligible patients with NDMM, D‐VTd had superior efficacy compared with VTd‐label. Despite a lower dose of thalidomide, VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety and was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR/ORR. These data further support the first‐line use of daratumumab plus VTd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9175692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91756922022-07-14 Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching Moreau, Philippe Hulin, Cyrille Zweegman, Sonja Hashim, Mahmoud Hu, Yannan Heeg, Bart de Boer, Carla Vanquickelberghe, Veronique Kampfenkel, Tobias He, Jianming Lam, Annette Cote, Sarah Sonneveld, Pieter EJHaem Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell BACKGROUND: Traditional bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include doses of thalidomide up to 200 mg/day (VTd‐label). Clinical practice has evolved to use a lower dose (100 mg/day) to reduce toxicity (VTd‐mod), which was evaluated in the phase III CASSIOPEIA study, without or with daratumumab (D‐VTd; an anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody). We used propensity score matching to compare efficacy and safety for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd with VTd‐label. METHODS: Patient‐level data for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd from CASSIOPEIA (NCT02541383) and data for VTd‐label from the PETHEMA/GEM study (NCT00461747) were analyzed. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression, and nearest‐neighbor matching procedure was used. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), postinduction and posttransplant responses, as well as rate of treatment discontinuation and grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and overall response rate (ORR). VTd‐mod was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR versus VTd‐label. VTd‐mod safety was not superior to VTd‐label despite the lower thalidomide dose. D‐VTd was significantly better than VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction and posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR, and was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In transplant‐eligible patients with NDMM, D‐VTd had superior efficacy compared with VTd‐label. Despite a lower dose of thalidomide, VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety and was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR/ORR. These data further support the first‐line use of daratumumab plus VTd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175692/ /pubmed/35846097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.129 Text en © 2020 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell
Moreau, Philippe
Hulin, Cyrille
Zweegman, Sonja
Hashim, Mahmoud
Hu, Yannan
Heeg, Bart
de Boer, Carla
Vanquickelberghe, Veronique
Kampfenkel, Tobias
He, Jianming
Lam, Annette
Cote, Sarah
Sonneveld, Pieter
Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
title Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (vtd) without and with daratumumab (d‐vtd) in cassiopeia versus vtd in pethema/gem in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
topic Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.129
work_keys_str_mv AT moreauphilippe comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT hulincyrille comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT zweegmansonja comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT hashimmahmoud comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT huyannan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT heegbart comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT deboercarla comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT vanquickelbergheveronique comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT kampfenkeltobias comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT hejianming comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT lamannette comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT cotesarah comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching
AT sonneveldpieter comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching