Cargando…
Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching
BACKGROUND: Traditional bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include doses of thalidomide up to 200 mg/day (VTd‐label). Clinical practice has evolved to use a lower dose (100 mg/day) to reduce toxicity (VTd‐mod), which wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.129 |
_version_ | 1784722504544157696 |
---|---|
author | Moreau, Philippe Hulin, Cyrille Zweegman, Sonja Hashim, Mahmoud Hu, Yannan Heeg, Bart de Boer, Carla Vanquickelberghe, Veronique Kampfenkel, Tobias He, Jianming Lam, Annette Cote, Sarah Sonneveld, Pieter |
author_facet | Moreau, Philippe Hulin, Cyrille Zweegman, Sonja Hashim, Mahmoud Hu, Yannan Heeg, Bart de Boer, Carla Vanquickelberghe, Veronique Kampfenkel, Tobias He, Jianming Lam, Annette Cote, Sarah Sonneveld, Pieter |
author_sort | Moreau, Philippe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditional bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include doses of thalidomide up to 200 mg/day (VTd‐label). Clinical practice has evolved to use a lower dose (100 mg/day) to reduce toxicity (VTd‐mod), which was evaluated in the phase III CASSIOPEIA study, without or with daratumumab (D‐VTd; an anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody). We used propensity score matching to compare efficacy and safety for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd with VTd‐label. METHODS: Patient‐level data for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd from CASSIOPEIA (NCT02541383) and data for VTd‐label from the PETHEMA/GEM study (NCT00461747) were analyzed. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression, and nearest‐neighbor matching procedure was used. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), postinduction and posttransplant responses, as well as rate of treatment discontinuation and grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and overall response rate (ORR). VTd‐mod was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR versus VTd‐label. VTd‐mod safety was not superior to VTd‐label despite the lower thalidomide dose. D‐VTd was significantly better than VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction and posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR, and was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In transplant‐eligible patients with NDMM, D‐VTd had superior efficacy compared with VTd‐label. Despite a lower dose of thalidomide, VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety and was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR/ORR. These data further support the first‐line use of daratumumab plus VTd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9175692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91756922022-07-14 Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching Moreau, Philippe Hulin, Cyrille Zweegman, Sonja Hashim, Mahmoud Hu, Yannan Heeg, Bart de Boer, Carla Vanquickelberghe, Veronique Kampfenkel, Tobias He, Jianming Lam, Annette Cote, Sarah Sonneveld, Pieter EJHaem Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell BACKGROUND: Traditional bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include doses of thalidomide up to 200 mg/day (VTd‐label). Clinical practice has evolved to use a lower dose (100 mg/day) to reduce toxicity (VTd‐mod), which was evaluated in the phase III CASSIOPEIA study, without or with daratumumab (D‐VTd; an anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody). We used propensity score matching to compare efficacy and safety for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd with VTd‐label. METHODS: Patient‐level data for VTd‐mod and D‐VTd from CASSIOPEIA (NCT02541383) and data for VTd‐label from the PETHEMA/GEM study (NCT00461747) were analyzed. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression, and nearest‐neighbor matching procedure was used. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), postinduction and posttransplant responses, as well as rate of treatment discontinuation and grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and overall response rate (ORR). VTd‐mod was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR versus VTd‐label. VTd‐mod safety was not superior to VTd‐label despite the lower thalidomide dose. D‐VTd was significantly better than VTd‐label for OS, PFS, TTP, postinduction and posttransplant ≥VGPR and ORR, and was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In transplant‐eligible patients with NDMM, D‐VTd had superior efficacy compared with VTd‐label. Despite a lower dose of thalidomide, VTd‐mod was noninferior to VTd‐label for safety and was significantly better for posttransplant ≥VGPR/ORR. These data further support the first‐line use of daratumumab plus VTd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9175692/ /pubmed/35846097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.129 Text en © 2020 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell Moreau, Philippe Hulin, Cyrille Zweegman, Sonja Hashim, Mahmoud Hu, Yannan Heeg, Bart de Boer, Carla Vanquickelberghe, Veronique Kampfenkel, Tobias He, Jianming Lam, Annette Cote, Sarah Sonneveld, Pieter Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching |
title | Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching |
title_full | Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching |
title_short | Comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) without and with daratumumab (D‐VTd) in CASSIOPEIA versus VTd in PETHEMA/GEM in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching |
title_sort | comparative efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (vtd) without and with daratumumab (d‐vtd) in cassiopeia versus vtd in pethema/gem in transplant‐eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, using propensity score matching |
topic | Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moreauphilippe comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT hulincyrille comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT zweegmansonja comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT hashimmahmoud comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT huyannan comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT heegbart comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT deboercarla comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT vanquickelbergheveronique comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT kampfenkeltobias comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT hejianming comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT lamannette comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT cotesarah comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching AT sonneveldpieter comparativeefficacyandsafetyofbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasonevtdwithoutandwithdaratumumabdvtdincassiopeiaversusvtdinpethemagemintransplanteligiblepatientswithnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomausingpropensityscorematching |