Cargando…

Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study

OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking (CAST) Scale and validate the clinical utility of measuring irritability by updating and replicating a previously published outcome calculator from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minhajuddin, Abu, Jha, Manish K., Fatt, Cherise Chin, Trivedi, Madhukar H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36101888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20190041
_version_ 1784722522974978048
author Minhajuddin, Abu
Jha, Manish K.
Fatt, Cherise Chin
Trivedi, Madhukar H.
author_facet Minhajuddin, Abu
Jha, Manish K.
Fatt, Cherise Chin
Trivedi, Madhukar H.
author_sort Minhajuddin, Abu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking (CAST) Scale and validate the clinical utility of measuring irritability by updating and replicating a previously published outcome calculator from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO‐MED) trial. METHODS: Participants were 292 adults from the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care (EMBARC) study who had completed the CAST scale at baseline. The scale's five‐domain (irritability, anxiety, mania, insomnia, and panic) structure was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis. Correlations with other clinical measures were used to confirm convergent and divergent validity. Logistic regression analyses from CO‐MED were used to estimate individual outcomes in EMBARC. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for the CAST scale was 0.78. Model fit for the five‐domain structure was adequate (goodness of fit index=0.93, comparative fit index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.06). Scores on irritability, anxiety, panic, insomnia, and mania were correlated with scores on the Anger Attack Questionnaire irritability item (r(s)=0.50), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression anxiety subscale (r(s)=0.24), Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire anxious arousal scale (r(s)=0.44), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self‐Report insomnia items (r(s)=0.38), and Altman Self‐Rating Mania Scale (r(s)=0.39), respectively. Individual outcomes of remission (area under the curve [AUC]=0.805) and no meaningful benefit (AUC=0.779) were predicted with high accuracy among EMBARC participants using their baseline and week 4 scores for depression and irritability and model estimates from CO‐MED. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring irritability may help predict clinical course. The CAST scale is a valid measure of depression‐associated symptoms, including irritability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9175787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91757872022-09-12 Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study Minhajuddin, Abu Jha, Manish K. Fatt, Cherise Chin Trivedi, Madhukar H. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract Articles OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking (CAST) Scale and validate the clinical utility of measuring irritability by updating and replicating a previously published outcome calculator from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO‐MED) trial. METHODS: Participants were 292 adults from the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care (EMBARC) study who had completed the CAST scale at baseline. The scale's five‐domain (irritability, anxiety, mania, insomnia, and panic) structure was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis. Correlations with other clinical measures were used to confirm convergent and divergent validity. Logistic regression analyses from CO‐MED were used to estimate individual outcomes in EMBARC. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for the CAST scale was 0.78. Model fit for the five‐domain structure was adequate (goodness of fit index=0.93, comparative fit index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.06). Scores on irritability, anxiety, panic, insomnia, and mania were correlated with scores on the Anger Attack Questionnaire irritability item (r(s)=0.50), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression anxiety subscale (r(s)=0.24), Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire anxious arousal scale (r(s)=0.44), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self‐Report insomnia items (r(s)=0.38), and Altman Self‐Rating Mania Scale (r(s)=0.39), respectively. Individual outcomes of remission (area under the curve [AUC]=0.805) and no meaningful benefit (AUC=0.779) were predicted with high accuracy among EMBARC participants using their baseline and week 4 scores for depression and irritability and model estimates from CO‐MED. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring irritability may help predict clinical course. The CAST scale is a valid measure of depression‐associated symptoms, including irritability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9175787/ /pubmed/36101888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20190041 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of the American Psychiatric Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Minhajuddin, Abu
Jha, Manish K.
Fatt, Cherise Chin
Trivedi, Madhukar H.
Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study
title Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study
title_full Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study
title_fullStr Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study
title_short Psychometric Properties of the Concise Associated Symptom Tracking Scale and Validation of Clinical Utility in the EMBARC Study
title_sort psychometric properties of the concise associated symptom tracking scale and validation of clinical utility in the embarc study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36101888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20190041
work_keys_str_mv AT minhajuddinabu psychometricpropertiesoftheconciseassociatedsymptomtrackingscaleandvalidationofclinicalutilityintheembarcstudy
AT jhamanishk psychometricpropertiesoftheconciseassociatedsymptomtrackingscaleandvalidationofclinicalutilityintheembarcstudy
AT fattcherisechin psychometricpropertiesoftheconciseassociatedsymptomtrackingscaleandvalidationofclinicalutilityintheembarcstudy
AT trivedimadhukarh psychometricpropertiesoftheconciseassociatedsymptomtrackingscaleandvalidationofclinicalutilityintheembarcstudy