Cargando…
Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma
Triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma (MM) describes MM refractory to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibodies. In the Phase IIb STORM study (NCT02336815), oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone (Sel‐dex) demonstrated a 26.2% overall response rate in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.120 |
_version_ | 1784722544673161216 |
---|---|
author | Richardson, Paul G. Jagannath, Sundar Chari, Ajai Vogl, Dan T. Dimopoulos, Meletios A. Moreau, Philippe Dingli, David Wei, Lee‐Jen Richter, Joshua Biran, Noa Siegel, David Reichmann, William Li, Lingling Tang, Shijie Saint‐Martin, Jean‐Richard Joshi, Anita Kauffman, Michael Shah, Jatin Shacham, Sharon Lonial, Sagar |
author_facet | Richardson, Paul G. Jagannath, Sundar Chari, Ajai Vogl, Dan T. Dimopoulos, Meletios A. Moreau, Philippe Dingli, David Wei, Lee‐Jen Richter, Joshua Biran, Noa Siegel, David Reichmann, William Li, Lingling Tang, Shijie Saint‐Martin, Jean‐Richard Joshi, Anita Kauffman, Michael Shah, Jatin Shacham, Sharon Lonial, Sagar |
author_sort | Richardson, Paul G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma (MM) describes MM refractory to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibodies. In the Phase IIb STORM study (NCT02336815), oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone (Sel‐dex) demonstrated a 26.2% overall response rate in triple‐class‐refractory MM. Here, we compare overall survival (OS) of 122 patients with triple‐class‐refractory MM who received Sel‐dex in STORM Part 2 with that of 64 similar patients treated with other available therapies in a Flatiron Health Analytic Database (FHAD) cohort. OS from the date that the patients’ MM became triple‐class‐refractory was longer in STORM versus FHAD, with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.43 (P = .0002; adjusted HR 0.35 [P = .011]). In a subset analysis of highly resistant patients receiving further therapies after their MM first became at least triple‐class‐refractory (i.e., who received Sel‐dex in STORM, n = 64, and non‐Sel‐dex in FHAD, n = 36), the OS was significantly longer in STORM with an unadjusted HR of 0.52 (P = .0331; adjusted HR 0.33 [P = .041]). Within the limits of this analysis, the OS of patients with at least triple‐class‐refractory MM was significantly better with Sel‐dex versus available therapies, suggesting that Sel‐dex may be associated with a meaningful OS benefit in these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9175889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91758892022-07-14 Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma Richardson, Paul G. Jagannath, Sundar Chari, Ajai Vogl, Dan T. Dimopoulos, Meletios A. Moreau, Philippe Dingli, David Wei, Lee‐Jen Richter, Joshua Biran, Noa Siegel, David Reichmann, William Li, Lingling Tang, Shijie Saint‐Martin, Jean‐Richard Joshi, Anita Kauffman, Michael Shah, Jatin Shacham, Sharon Lonial, Sagar EJHaem Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell Triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma (MM) describes MM refractory to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibodies. In the Phase IIb STORM study (NCT02336815), oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone (Sel‐dex) demonstrated a 26.2% overall response rate in triple‐class‐refractory MM. Here, we compare overall survival (OS) of 122 patients with triple‐class‐refractory MM who received Sel‐dex in STORM Part 2 with that of 64 similar patients treated with other available therapies in a Flatiron Health Analytic Database (FHAD) cohort. OS from the date that the patients’ MM became triple‐class‐refractory was longer in STORM versus FHAD, with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.43 (P = .0002; adjusted HR 0.35 [P = .011]). In a subset analysis of highly resistant patients receiving further therapies after their MM first became at least triple‐class‐refractory (i.e., who received Sel‐dex in STORM, n = 64, and non‐Sel‐dex in FHAD, n = 36), the OS was significantly longer in STORM with an unadjusted HR of 0.52 (P = .0331; adjusted HR 0.33 [P = .041]). Within the limits of this analysis, the OS of patients with at least triple‐class‐refractory MM was significantly better with Sel‐dex versus available therapies, suggesting that Sel‐dex may be associated with a meaningful OS benefit in these patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9175889/ /pubmed/35846096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.120 Text en © 2020 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell Richardson, Paul G. Jagannath, Sundar Chari, Ajai Vogl, Dan T. Dimopoulos, Meletios A. Moreau, Philippe Dingli, David Wei, Lee‐Jen Richter, Joshua Biran, Noa Siegel, David Reichmann, William Li, Lingling Tang, Shijie Saint‐Martin, Jean‐Richard Joshi, Anita Kauffman, Michael Shah, Jatin Shacham, Sharon Lonial, Sagar Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma |
title | Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma |
title_full | Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma |
title_fullStr | Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma |
title_short | Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma |
title_sort | overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma |
topic | Haematologic Malignancy–Plasma Cell |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardsonpaulg overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT jagannathsundar overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT chariajai overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT vogldant overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT dimopoulosmeletiosa overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT moreauphilippe overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT dinglidavid overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT weileejen overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT richterjoshua overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT birannoa overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT siegeldavid overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT reichmannwilliam overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT lilingling overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT tangshijie overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT saintmartinjeanrichard overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT joshianita overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT kauffmanmichael overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT shahjatin overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT shachamsharon overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma AT lonialsagar overallsurvivalwithoralselinexorpluslowdosedexamethasoneversusrealworldtherapyintripleclassrefractorymultiplemyeloma |