Cargando…

Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Introduction. In the context of the global pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2, procurement of personal protective equipment during the crisis was problematic. The idea of reusing and decontaminating personal surgical masks in facilities was explored in order to avoid the accumulation of waste and overcome t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez, Elisa, Crèvecoeur, Sébastien, Dams, Lorène, Rabecki, Frédéric, Habraken, Serge, Haubruge, Eric, Daube, Georges
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Microbiology Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000342
_version_ 1784722563459448832
author Martinez, Elisa
Crèvecoeur, Sébastien
Dams, Lorène
Rabecki, Frédéric
Habraken, Serge
Haubruge, Eric
Daube, Georges
author_facet Martinez, Elisa
Crèvecoeur, Sébastien
Dams, Lorène
Rabecki, Frédéric
Habraken, Serge
Haubruge, Eric
Daube, Georges
author_sort Martinez, Elisa
collection PubMed
description Introduction. In the context of the global pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2, procurement of personal protective equipment during the crisis was problematic. The idea of reusing and decontaminating personal surgical masks in facilities was explored in order to avoid the accumulation of waste and overcome the lack of equipment. Hypothesis. Our hypothesis is that this work will show the decontamination methods assessed are effective for bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Aim. We aim to provide information about the effects of five decontamination procedures (UV treatment, dry heat, vaporized H(2)O(2), ethanol treatment and blue methylene treatment) on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa . These bacteria are the main secondary bacterial pathogens responsible for lung infections in the hospital environment. Methodology. The surgical masks and the filtering facepiece respirators were inoculated with two bacterial strains ( S. aureus ATCC 29213 and P. aeruginosa S0599) and submitted to five decontamination treatments: vaporized H(2)O(2) (VHP), UV irradiation, dry heat treatment, ethanol bath treatment and blue methylene treatment. Direct and indirect microbiology assessments were performed on three positive controls, five treated masks and one negative control. Results. The five decontaminations showed significant (P<0.05) but different degrees of reductions of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa . VHP, dry heat treatment and ethanol treatment adequately reduced the initial contamination. The 4 min UV treatment allowed only a reduction to five orders of magnitude for face mask respirators. The methylene blue treatment induced a reduction to two orders of magnitude. Conclusions. The three methods that showed a log(10) reduction factor of 6 were the dry heat method, VHP and ethanol bath treatment. These methods are effective and their establishment in the medical field are easy but require economic investment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9175975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Microbiology Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91759752022-06-09 Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Martinez, Elisa Crèvecoeur, Sébastien Dams, Lorène Rabecki, Frédéric Habraken, Serge Haubruge, Eric Daube, Georges Access Microbiol Research Articles Introduction. In the context of the global pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2, procurement of personal protective equipment during the crisis was problematic. The idea of reusing and decontaminating personal surgical masks in facilities was explored in order to avoid the accumulation of waste and overcome the lack of equipment. Hypothesis. Our hypothesis is that this work will show the decontamination methods assessed are effective for bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Aim. We aim to provide information about the effects of five decontamination procedures (UV treatment, dry heat, vaporized H(2)O(2), ethanol treatment and blue methylene treatment) on S. aureus and P. aeruginosa . These bacteria are the main secondary bacterial pathogens responsible for lung infections in the hospital environment. Methodology. The surgical masks and the filtering facepiece respirators were inoculated with two bacterial strains ( S. aureus ATCC 29213 and P. aeruginosa S0599) and submitted to five decontamination treatments: vaporized H(2)O(2) (VHP), UV irradiation, dry heat treatment, ethanol bath treatment and blue methylene treatment. Direct and indirect microbiology assessments were performed on three positive controls, five treated masks and one negative control. Results. The five decontaminations showed significant (P<0.05) but different degrees of reductions of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa . VHP, dry heat treatment and ethanol treatment adequately reduced the initial contamination. The 4 min UV treatment allowed only a reduction to five orders of magnitude for face mask respirators. The methylene blue treatment induced a reduction to two orders of magnitude. Conclusions. The three methods that showed a log(10) reduction factor of 6 were the dry heat method, VHP and ethanol bath treatment. These methods are effective and their establishment in the medical field are easy but require economic investment. Microbiology Society 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9175975/ /pubmed/35693470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000342 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Martinez, Elisa
Crèvecoeur, Sébastien
Dams, Lorène
Rabecki, Frédéric
Habraken, Serge
Haubruge, Eric
Daube, Georges
Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_fullStr Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full_unstemmed Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_short Effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_sort effect of five decontamination methods on face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9175975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000342
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezelisa effectoffivedecontaminationmethodsonfacemasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorscontaminatedwithstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT crevecoeursebastien effectoffivedecontaminationmethodsonfacemasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorscontaminatedwithstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT damslorene effectoffivedecontaminationmethodsonfacemasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorscontaminatedwithstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT rabeckifrederic effectoffivedecontaminationmethodsonfacemasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorscontaminatedwithstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT habrakenserge effectoffivedecontaminationmethodsonfacemasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorscontaminatedwithstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT haubrugeeric effectoffivedecontaminationmethodsonfacemasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorscontaminatedwithstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT daubegeorges effectoffivedecontaminationmethodsonfacemasksandfilteringfacepiecerespiratorscontaminatedwithstaphylococcusaureusandpseudomonasaeruginosa