Cargando…
Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes
RESEARCH QUESTION: Do elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes in women 1–13 months after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alter compared with unvaccinated women and do different time intervals between vaccination and ovarian stimulation impact these outcomes? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study, conduct...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9176203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.001 |
_version_ | 1784722612488765440 |
---|---|
author | Karavani, Gilad Chill, Henry H. Dick, Aharon Meirman, Cherut Gutman-Ido, Einat Herzberg, Shmuel Ben-Meir, Assaf Imbar, Tal |
author_facet | Karavani, Gilad Chill, Henry H. Dick, Aharon Meirman, Cherut Gutman-Ido, Einat Herzberg, Shmuel Ben-Meir, Assaf Imbar, Tal |
author_sort | Karavani, Gilad |
collection | PubMed |
description | RESEARCH QUESTION: Do elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes in women 1–13 months after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alter compared with unvaccinated women and do different time intervals between vaccination and ovarian stimulation impact these outcomes? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study, conducted in a university-affiliated IVF centre, included 232 elective oocyte cryopreservation cycles of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, without previous infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, between December 2020 and January 2022. Two control groups – pre-pandemic (January 2019 to February 2020) and intra-pandemic (December 2020 to January 2022) unvaccinated groups – were compared with the vaccinated group, further divided into four subgroups (under 3, 3–6, 6–9 and 9–13 months). The primary outcome was the elective oocyte cryopreservation cycle outcomes – number of retrieved and number of mature oocytes. RESULTS: The vaccinated group demonstrated comparable outcomes with regards to number of retrieved and mature oocytes compared with the pre-pandemic and intra-pandemic unvaccinated groups (12.6 ± 8.0 versus 13.0 ± 8.2 and 12.5 ± 7.4 retrieved and 10.1 ± 6.9 versus 9.5 ± 6.4 and 10.1 ± 6.3 mature oocytes, respectively; not significant for both). Similar results were noted in a comparison between the intra-pandemic unvaccinated group and the four vaccinated subgroups. No correlation was found between the parameter of days from vaccination and cycle outcomes. Similarly, analysis of covariance showed no association between vaccination status and timing and number of mature oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination does not alter the outcomes of elective oocyte cryopreservation procedures. This is true even in a relatively long time interval of 9 to 13 months from vaccination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9176203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91762032022-06-09 Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes Karavani, Gilad Chill, Henry H. Dick, Aharon Meirman, Cherut Gutman-Ido, Einat Herzberg, Shmuel Ben-Meir, Assaf Imbar, Tal Reprod Biomed Online Article RESEARCH QUESTION: Do elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes in women 1–13 months after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alter compared with unvaccinated women and do different time intervals between vaccination and ovarian stimulation impact these outcomes? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study, conducted in a university-affiliated IVF centre, included 232 elective oocyte cryopreservation cycles of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, without previous infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, between December 2020 and January 2022. Two control groups – pre-pandemic (January 2019 to February 2020) and intra-pandemic (December 2020 to January 2022) unvaccinated groups – were compared with the vaccinated group, further divided into four subgroups (under 3, 3–6, 6–9 and 9–13 months). The primary outcome was the elective oocyte cryopreservation cycle outcomes – number of retrieved and number of mature oocytes. RESULTS: The vaccinated group demonstrated comparable outcomes with regards to number of retrieved and mature oocytes compared with the pre-pandemic and intra-pandemic unvaccinated groups (12.6 ± 8.0 versus 13.0 ± 8.2 and 12.5 ± 7.4 retrieved and 10.1 ± 6.9 versus 9.5 ± 6.4 and 10.1 ± 6.3 mature oocytes, respectively; not significant for both). Similar results were noted in a comparison between the intra-pandemic unvaccinated group and the four vaccinated subgroups. No correlation was found between the parameter of days from vaccination and cycle outcomes. Similarly, analysis of covariance showed no association between vaccination status and timing and number of mature oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination does not alter the outcomes of elective oocyte cryopreservation procedures. This is true even in a relatively long time interval of 9 to 13 months from vaccination. Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-11 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9176203/ /pubmed/35953414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.001 Text en © 2022 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Karavani, Gilad Chill, Henry H. Dick, Aharon Meirman, Cherut Gutman-Ido, Einat Herzberg, Shmuel Ben-Meir, Assaf Imbar, Tal Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes |
title | Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes |
title_full | Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes |
title_fullStr | Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes |
title_short | Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes |
title_sort | pfizer sars-cov-2 bnt162b2 mrna vaccination (bnt162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9176203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karavanigilad pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes AT chillhenryh pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes AT dickaharon pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes AT meirmancherut pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes AT gutmanidoeinat pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes AT herzbergshmuel pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes AT benmeirassaf pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes AT imbartal pfizersarscov2bnt162b2mrnavaccinationbnt162b2hasnoadverseeffectonelectiveoocytecryopreservationoutcomes |