Cargando…

Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?

Memory tends to be better when items are processed for their meaning (deep processing) rather than their perceptual features (shallow processing). This levels of processing (LOP) effect is well-replicated and has been applied in many settings, but the mechanisms involved are still not well understoo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mundorf, Abigail M. D., Uitvlugt, Mitchell G., Healey, M. Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9176387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02112-1
_version_ 1784722653666344960
author Mundorf, Abigail M. D.
Uitvlugt, Mitchell G.
Healey, M. Karl
author_facet Mundorf, Abigail M. D.
Uitvlugt, Mitchell G.
Healey, M. Karl
author_sort Mundorf, Abigail M. D.
collection PubMed
description Memory tends to be better when items are processed for their meaning (deep processing) rather than their perceptual features (shallow processing). This levels of processing (LOP) effect is well-replicated and has been applied in many settings, but the mechanisms involved are still not well understood. The temporal contiguity effect (TCE), the finding that recalling one event often triggers recall of another event experienced nearby in time, also predicts memory performance. This effect has given rise to several competing theories with specific contiguity-generating mechanisms related to how items are processed. Therefore, studying how LOP and the TCE interact may shed light on the mechanisms underlying both effects. However, it is unknown how LOP and the TCE interact—various theories make differing predictions. In this preregistered study, we tested predictions of three theoretical explanations: accounts which assume temporal information is automatically encoded, accounts based on a trade-off between item and order information, and accounts which emphasize the importance of strategic control processes. Participants completed an immediate free recall task where they either engaged in deep processing, shallow processing, or no additional task while studying each word. Recall and the TCE were highest for no-task lists and greater for deep than shallow processing. Our results support theories which assume temporal associations are automatically encoded and those which emphasize strategic control processes. Both perspectives should be considered in theory development. These findings also suggest temporal information may contribute to better recall under deeper processing with implications for determining which situations benefit from deep processing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-022-02112-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9176387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91763872022-06-09 Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity? Mundorf, Abigail M. D. Uitvlugt, Mitchell G. Healey, M. Karl Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report Memory tends to be better when items are processed for their meaning (deep processing) rather than their perceptual features (shallow processing). This levels of processing (LOP) effect is well-replicated and has been applied in many settings, but the mechanisms involved are still not well understood. The temporal contiguity effect (TCE), the finding that recalling one event often triggers recall of another event experienced nearby in time, also predicts memory performance. This effect has given rise to several competing theories with specific contiguity-generating mechanisms related to how items are processed. Therefore, studying how LOP and the TCE interact may shed light on the mechanisms underlying both effects. However, it is unknown how LOP and the TCE interact—various theories make differing predictions. In this preregistered study, we tested predictions of three theoretical explanations: accounts which assume temporal information is automatically encoded, accounts based on a trade-off between item and order information, and accounts which emphasize the importance of strategic control processes. Participants completed an immediate free recall task where they either engaged in deep processing, shallow processing, or no additional task while studying each word. Recall and the TCE were highest for no-task lists and greater for deep than shallow processing. Our results support theories which assume temporal associations are automatically encoded and those which emphasize strategic control processes. Both perspectives should be considered in theory development. These findings also suggest temporal information may contribute to better recall under deeper processing with implications for determining which situations benefit from deep processing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-022-02112-1. Springer US 2022-06-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9176387/ /pubmed/35676611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02112-1 Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Mundorf, Abigail M. D.
Uitvlugt, Mitchell G.
Healey, M. Karl
Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?
title Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?
title_full Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?
title_fullStr Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?
title_full_unstemmed Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?
title_short Does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?
title_sort does depth of processing affect temporal contiguity?
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9176387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02112-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mundorfabigailmd doesdepthofprocessingaffecttemporalcontiguity
AT uitvlugtmitchellg doesdepthofprocessingaffecttemporalcontiguity
AT healeymkarl doesdepthofprocessingaffecttemporalcontiguity