Cargando…
Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018
BACKGROUND: In the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyab069 |
_version_ | 1784722823183335424 |
---|---|
author | Nakayama, Izuma Takahari, Daisuke Shimozaki, Keitaro Chin, Keisho Wakatsuki, Takeru Ogura, Mariko Ooki, Akira Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku Osumi, Hiroki Shinozaki, Eiji Yamaguchi, Kensei |
author_facet | Nakayama, Izuma Takahari, Daisuke Shimozaki, Keitaro Chin, Keisho Wakatsuki, Takeru Ogura, Mariko Ooki, Akira Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku Osumi, Hiroki Shinozaki, Eiji Yamaguchi, Kensei |
author_sort | Nakayama, Izuma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of treatment-naive AGC patients who received combination chemotherapy of fluoropyrimidine and platinum between 2007 and 2018 and divided them into three groups: Groups A (2007-10), B (2011-14), and C (2015-2018), respectively. We compared the clinicopathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes among the three groups. RESULTS: In total, 1004 consecutive patients were enrolled (A; n = 254, B; n = 300, and C; n = 450). The number of patients with poor performance status, older age, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, and primary tumor increased during the study period. All groups had similar median overall survival (OS); ~16 months) without any statistical difference but steady prolongation of survival was observed in the adjusted with imbalance prognostic factors among groups (B/A; hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% C.I 0.68-0.98, C/A; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86); OS of HER2-positive AGC patients was clearly improved (HER2-positive vs HER2-negative in Group B, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.06; Group C, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) but that of diffuse-type AGC patients remained dismal. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing availability of chemotherapy options potentially contributed to improved survival of AGC patients, but expanded chemotherapeutic indications made the survival benefit inconspicuous in the whole population. Future therapeutic development for the AGC subset not adequately receiving benefit from previous clinical trials is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9177114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91771142022-06-09 Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018 Nakayama, Izuma Takahari, Daisuke Shimozaki, Keitaro Chin, Keisho Wakatsuki, Takeru Ogura, Mariko Ooki, Akira Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku Osumi, Hiroki Shinozaki, Eiji Yamaguchi, Kensei Oncologist Gastrointestinal Cancer BACKGROUND: In the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of treatment-naive AGC patients who received combination chemotherapy of fluoropyrimidine and platinum between 2007 and 2018 and divided them into three groups: Groups A (2007-10), B (2011-14), and C (2015-2018), respectively. We compared the clinicopathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes among the three groups. RESULTS: In total, 1004 consecutive patients were enrolled (A; n = 254, B; n = 300, and C; n = 450). The number of patients with poor performance status, older age, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, and primary tumor increased during the study period. All groups had similar median overall survival (OS); ~16 months) without any statistical difference but steady prolongation of survival was observed in the adjusted with imbalance prognostic factors among groups (B/A; hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% C.I 0.68-0.98, C/A; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86); OS of HER2-positive AGC patients was clearly improved (HER2-positive vs HER2-negative in Group B, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.06; Group C, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) but that of diffuse-type AGC patients remained dismal. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing availability of chemotherapy options potentially contributed to improved survival of AGC patients, but expanded chemotherapeutic indications made the survival benefit inconspicuous in the whole population. Future therapeutic development for the AGC subset not adequately receiving benefit from previous clinical trials is warranted. Oxford University Press 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9177114/ /pubmed/35596939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyab069 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Cancer Nakayama, Izuma Takahari, Daisuke Shimozaki, Keitaro Chin, Keisho Wakatsuki, Takeru Ogura, Mariko Ooki, Akira Kamiimabeppu, Daisaku Osumi, Hiroki Shinozaki, Eiji Yamaguchi, Kensei Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018 |
title | Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018 |
title_full | Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018 |
title_fullStr | Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018 |
title_short | Clinical Progress in Inoperable or Recurrent Advanced Gastric Cancer Treatment from 1004 Single Institute Experiences Between 2007 and 2018 |
title_sort | clinical progress in inoperable or recurrent advanced gastric cancer treatment from 1004 single institute experiences between 2007 and 2018 |
topic | Gastrointestinal Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyab069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakayamaizuma clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT takaharidaisuke clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT shimozakikeitaro clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT chinkeisho clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT wakatsukitakeru clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT oguramariko clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT ookiakira clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT kamiimabeppudaisaku clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT osumihiroki clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT shinozakieiji clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 AT yamaguchikensei clinicalprogressininoperableorrecurrentadvancedgastriccancertreatmentfrom1004singleinstituteexperiencesbetween2007and2018 |