Cargando…
The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Firearm misuse is common in cases of homicide, suicide and unintentional injury; this is a major public health issue, with societal and economic costs extending beyond the immediate injury or loss of life. We sought to review the evidence on the effectiveness of Canadian legislation in r...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Impact Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672042 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210192 |
_version_ | 1784722837318139904 |
---|---|
author | Bennett, Nick Karkada, Manolhas Erdogan, Mete Green, Robert S. |
author_facet | Bennett, Nick Karkada, Manolhas Erdogan, Mete Green, Robert S. |
author_sort | Bennett, Nick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Firearm misuse is common in cases of homicide, suicide and unintentional injury; this is a major public health issue, with societal and economic costs extending beyond the immediate injury or loss of life. We sought to review the evidence on the effectiveness of Canadian legislation in reducing deaths caused by firearms. METHODS: Five databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from inception to May 2021 for studies evaluating the effect of Canadian gun control laws Bill C-51 (1977), Bill C-17 (1991) and Bill C-68 (1995) on rates of firearm-related death. Two reviewers performed article screening independently and in duplicate. We synthesized data using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome of interest was firearm-related mortality rates. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not performed. RESULTS: Overall, 1479 articles were screened, and 18 studies were included. Ten studies examined the effect on homicides, of which 5 reported a reduction during the postlegislation period; 1 study reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other methods of homicide among people aged 15–24 years. Eleven studies evaluated the effect on suicides, with 9 finding a reduction in suicide rates. Eight of these studies reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other suicide methods. Two studies investigated accidental deaths; neither reported any benefit after legislation. INTERPRETATION: Evidence supporting the effectiveness of Canadian firearms legislation in the reduction of homicide and accidental death rates is inconclusive; a decrease in firearm-related suicide rates was observed by most studies, but evidence of method substitution was also identified. Re-evaluation of existing laws may be beneficial to build an improved and effective evidence-based national framework for prevention of gun violence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020192486 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9177199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | CMA Impact Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91771992022-06-12 The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review Bennett, Nick Karkada, Manolhas Erdogan, Mete Green, Robert S. CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: Firearm misuse is common in cases of homicide, suicide and unintentional injury; this is a major public health issue, with societal and economic costs extending beyond the immediate injury or loss of life. We sought to review the evidence on the effectiveness of Canadian legislation in reducing deaths caused by firearms. METHODS: Five databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from inception to May 2021 for studies evaluating the effect of Canadian gun control laws Bill C-51 (1977), Bill C-17 (1991) and Bill C-68 (1995) on rates of firearm-related death. Two reviewers performed article screening independently and in duplicate. We synthesized data using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome of interest was firearm-related mortality rates. Because of study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not performed. RESULTS: Overall, 1479 articles were screened, and 18 studies were included. Ten studies examined the effect on homicides, of which 5 reported a reduction during the postlegislation period; 1 study reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other methods of homicide among people aged 15–24 years. Eleven studies evaluated the effect on suicides, with 9 finding a reduction in suicide rates. Eight of these studies reported evidence of substitution from firearms to other suicide methods. Two studies investigated accidental deaths; neither reported any benefit after legislation. INTERPRETATION: Evidence supporting the effectiveness of Canadian firearms legislation in the reduction of homicide and accidental death rates is inconclusive; a decrease in firearm-related suicide rates was observed by most studies, but evidence of method substitution was also identified. Re-evaluation of existing laws may be beneficial to build an improved and effective evidence-based national framework for prevention of gun violence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020192486 CMA Impact Inc. 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9177199/ /pubmed/35672042 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210192 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Bennett, Nick Karkada, Manolhas Erdogan, Mete Green, Robert S. The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review |
title | The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review |
title_full | The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review |
title_short | The effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in Canada: a systematic review |
title_sort | effect of legislation on firearm-related deaths in canada: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672042 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210192 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bennettnick theeffectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview AT karkadamanolhas theeffectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview AT erdoganmete theeffectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview AT greenroberts theeffectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview AT bennettnick effectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview AT karkadamanolhas effectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview AT erdoganmete effectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview AT greenroberts effectoflegislationonfirearmrelateddeathsincanadaasystematicreview |