Cargando…

Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanley, Gillian E., Niu, Jin, Han, Jihee, Fung, Sharon, Bryant, Heather, Kwon, Janice S., Huntsman, David G., Finlayson, Sarah J., McAlpine, Jessica N., Miller, Dianne, Earle, Craig C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640988
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210219
_version_ 1784722837564555264
author Hanley, Gillian E.
Niu, Jin
Han, Jihee
Fung, Sharon
Bryant, Heather
Kwon, Janice S.
Huntsman, David G.
Finlayson, Sarah J.
McAlpine, Jessica N.
Miller, Dianne
Earle, Craig C.
author_facet Hanley, Gillian E.
Niu, Jin
Han, Jihee
Fung, Sharon
Bryant, Heather
Kwon, Janice S.
Huntsman, David G.
Finlayson, Sarah J.
McAlpine, Jessica N.
Miller, Dianne
Earle, Craig C.
author_sort Hanley, Gillian E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period. METHODS: Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations. RESULTS: A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS). INTERPRETATION: The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9177200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91772002022-06-12 Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis Hanley, Gillian E. Niu, Jin Han, Jihee Fung, Sharon Bryant, Heather Kwon, Janice S. Huntsman, David G. Finlayson, Sarah J. McAlpine, Jessica N. Miller, Dianne Earle, Craig C. CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period. METHODS: Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations. RESULTS: A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS). INTERPRETATION: The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9177200/ /pubmed/35640988 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210219 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Hanley, Gillian E.
Niu, Jin
Han, Jihee
Fung, Sharon
Bryant, Heather
Kwon, Janice S.
Huntsman, David G.
Finlayson, Sarah J.
McAlpine, Jessica N.
Miller, Dianne
Earle, Craig C.
Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis
title Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis
title_full Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis
title_fullStr Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis
title_full_unstemmed Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis
title_short Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis
title_sort opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640988
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210219
work_keys_str_mv AT hanleygilliane opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT niujin opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT hanjihee opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT fungsharon opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT bryantheather opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT kwonjanices opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT huntsmandavidg opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT finlaysonsarahj opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT mcalpinejessican opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT millerdianne opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis
AT earlecraigc opportunisticsalpingectomybetween2011and2016adescriptiveanalysis