Cargando…

LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is increasing due to improved cancer survival. Serial monitoring of cardiac function is essential to detect CTRCD, guiding timely intervention strategies. Multigated radionuclide angiography (MUGA) has been the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Printezi, Markella I., Yousif, Laura I. E., Kamphuis, Janine A. M., van Laake, Linda W., Cramer, Maarten J., Hobbelink, Monique G. G., Asselbergs, Folkert W., Teske, Arco J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11897-022-00544-3
_version_ 1784722900877574144
author Printezi, Markella I.
Yousif, Laura I. E.
Kamphuis, Janine A. M.
van Laake, Linda W.
Cramer, Maarten J.
Hobbelink, Monique G. G.
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Teske, Arco J.
author_facet Printezi, Markella I.
Yousif, Laura I. E.
Kamphuis, Janine A. M.
van Laake, Linda W.
Cramer, Maarten J.
Hobbelink, Monique G. G.
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Teske, Arco J.
author_sort Printezi, Markella I.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is increasing due to improved cancer survival. Serial monitoring of cardiac function is essential to detect CTRCD, guiding timely intervention strategies. Multigated radionuclide angiography (MUGA) has been the main screening tool using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to monitor cardiac dysfunction. However, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be more suitable for serial assessment. We aimed to assess the concordance between different non-radiating imaging modalities with MUGA to determine whether they can be used interchangeably. RECENT FINDINGS: In order to identify relevant studies, a PubMed search was performed. We included cross-sectional studies comparing MUGA LVEF to that of 2D TTE, 3D TTE, and CMR. From 470 articles, 22 were selected, comprising 1017 patients in total. Among others, this included three 3D TTE, seven 2D harmonic TTE + contrast (2DHC), and seven CMR comparisons. The correlations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement varied for CMR but were stronger for 3D TTE and 2DHC. SUMMARY: Our findings suggest that MUGA and CMR should not be used interchangeably whereas 3D TTE and 2DHC are appropriate alternatives following an initial MUGA scan. We propose a multimodality diagnostic imaging strategy for LVEF monitoring in patients undergoing cancer treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11897-022-00544-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9177497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91774972022-06-10 LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review Printezi, Markella I. Yousif, Laura I. E. Kamphuis, Janine A. M. van Laake, Linda W. Cramer, Maarten J. Hobbelink, Monique G. G. Asselbergs, Folkert W. Teske, Arco J. Curr Heart Fail Rep Cardio-Oncology (P. Ameri, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is increasing due to improved cancer survival. Serial monitoring of cardiac function is essential to detect CTRCD, guiding timely intervention strategies. Multigated radionuclide angiography (MUGA) has been the main screening tool using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to monitor cardiac dysfunction. However, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) may be more suitable for serial assessment. We aimed to assess the concordance between different non-radiating imaging modalities with MUGA to determine whether they can be used interchangeably. RECENT FINDINGS: In order to identify relevant studies, a PubMed search was performed. We included cross-sectional studies comparing MUGA LVEF to that of 2D TTE, 3D TTE, and CMR. From 470 articles, 22 were selected, comprising 1017 patients in total. Among others, this included three 3D TTE, seven 2D harmonic TTE + contrast (2DHC), and seven CMR comparisons. The correlations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement varied for CMR but were stronger for 3D TTE and 2DHC. SUMMARY: Our findings suggest that MUGA and CMR should not be used interchangeably whereas 3D TTE and 2DHC are appropriate alternatives following an initial MUGA scan. We propose a multimodality diagnostic imaging strategy for LVEF monitoring in patients undergoing cancer treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11897-022-00544-3. Springer US 2022-03-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9177497/ /pubmed/35355205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11897-022-00544-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardio-Oncology (P. Ameri, Section Editor)
Printezi, Markella I.
Yousif, Laura I. E.
Kamphuis, Janine A. M.
van Laake, Linda W.
Cramer, Maarten J.
Hobbelink, Monique G. G.
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Teske, Arco J.
LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review
title LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review
title_full LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review
title_short LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review
title_sort lvef by multigated acquisition scan compared to other imaging modalities in cardio-oncology: a systematic review
topic Cardio-Oncology (P. Ameri, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11897-022-00544-3
work_keys_str_mv AT printezimarkellai lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview
AT yousiflauraie lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview
AT kamphuisjanineam lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview
AT vanlaakelindaw lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview
AT cramermaartenj lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview
AT hobbelinkmoniquegg lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview
AT asselbergsfolkertw lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview
AT teskearcoj lvefbymultigatedacquisitionscancomparedtootherimagingmodalitiesincardiooncologyasystematicreview