Cargando…
Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk
Clinical prediction models typically make point estimates of risk. However, values of key variables are often missing during model development or at prediction time, meaning that the point estimates mask significant uncertainty and can lead to over-confident decision making. We present a model of mo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00616-7 |
_version_ | 1784722928552640512 |
---|---|
author | Mathiszig-Lee, Jakob F. Catling, Finneas J. R. Moonesinghe, S. Ramani Brett, Stephen J. |
author_facet | Mathiszig-Lee, Jakob F. Catling, Finneas J. R. Moonesinghe, S. Ramani Brett, Stephen J. |
author_sort | Mathiszig-Lee, Jakob F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical prediction models typically make point estimates of risk. However, values of key variables are often missing during model development or at prediction time, meaning that the point estimates mask significant uncertainty and can lead to over-confident decision making. We present a model of mortality risk in emergency laparotomy which instead presents a distribution of predicted risks, highlighting the uncertainty over the risk of death with an intuitive visualisation. We developed and validated our model using data from 127134 emergency laparotomies from patients in England and Wales during 2013–2019. We captured the uncertainty arising from missing data using multiple imputation, allowing prospective, patient-specific imputation for variables that were frequently missing. Prospective imputation allows early prognostication in patients where these variables are not yet measured, accounting for the additional uncertainty this induces. Our model showed good discrimination and calibration (95% confidence intervals: Brier score 0.071–0.078, C statistic 0.859–0.873, calibration error 0.031–0.059) on unseen data from 37 hospitals, consistently improving upon the current gold-standard model. The dispersion of the predicted risks varied significantly between patients and increased where prospective imputation occurred. We present a case study that illustrates the potential impact of uncertainty quantification on clinical decision making. Our model improves mortality risk prediction in emergency laparotomy and has the potential to inform decision-makers and assist discussions with patients and their families. Our analysis code was robustly developed and is publicly available for easy replication of our study and adaptation to predicting other outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9177766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91777662022-06-10 Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk Mathiszig-Lee, Jakob F. Catling, Finneas J. R. Moonesinghe, S. Ramani Brett, Stephen J. NPJ Digit Med Article Clinical prediction models typically make point estimates of risk. However, values of key variables are often missing during model development or at prediction time, meaning that the point estimates mask significant uncertainty and can lead to over-confident decision making. We present a model of mortality risk in emergency laparotomy which instead presents a distribution of predicted risks, highlighting the uncertainty over the risk of death with an intuitive visualisation. We developed and validated our model using data from 127134 emergency laparotomies from patients in England and Wales during 2013–2019. We captured the uncertainty arising from missing data using multiple imputation, allowing prospective, patient-specific imputation for variables that were frequently missing. Prospective imputation allows early prognostication in patients where these variables are not yet measured, accounting for the additional uncertainty this induces. Our model showed good discrimination and calibration (95% confidence intervals: Brier score 0.071–0.078, C statistic 0.859–0.873, calibration error 0.031–0.059) on unseen data from 37 hospitals, consistently improving upon the current gold-standard model. The dispersion of the predicted risks varied significantly between patients and increased where prospective imputation occurred. We present a case study that illustrates the potential impact of uncertainty quantification on clinical decision making. Our model improves mortality risk prediction in emergency laparotomy and has the potential to inform decision-makers and assist discussions with patients and their families. Our analysis code was robustly developed and is publicly available for easy replication of our study and adaptation to predicting other outcomes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9177766/ /pubmed/35676451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00616-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mathiszig-Lee, Jakob F. Catling, Finneas J. R. Moonesinghe, S. Ramani Brett, Stephen J. Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk |
title | Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk |
title_full | Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk |
title_fullStr | Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk |
title_short | Highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk |
title_sort | highlighting uncertainty in clinical risk prediction using a model of emergency laparotomy mortality risk |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00616-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathiszigleejakobf highlightinguncertaintyinclinicalriskpredictionusingamodelofemergencylaparotomymortalityrisk AT catlingfinneasjr highlightinguncertaintyinclinicalriskpredictionusingamodelofemergencylaparotomymortalityrisk AT moonesinghesramani highlightinguncertaintyinclinicalriskpredictionusingamodelofemergencylaparotomymortalityrisk AT brettstephenj highlightinguncertaintyinclinicalriskpredictionusingamodelofemergencylaparotomymortalityrisk |