Cargando…
Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health
We study the effect of punitive and priority treatment policies relating to illicit substance use during pregnancy on the rate of neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome, low birth weight, low gestational age, and prenatal care use. Punitive policies criminalize prenatal substance use, or define prenatal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4518 |
_version_ | 1784722931278938112 |
---|---|
author | Meinhofer, Angélica Witman, Allison Maclean, Johanna Catherine Bao, Yuhua |
author_facet | Meinhofer, Angélica Witman, Allison Maclean, Johanna Catherine Bao, Yuhua |
author_sort | Meinhofer, Angélica |
collection | PubMed |
description | We study the effect of punitive and priority treatment policies relating to illicit substance use during pregnancy on the rate of neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome, low birth weight, low gestational age, and prenatal care use. Punitive policies criminalize prenatal substance use, or define prenatal substance exposure as child maltreatment in child welfare statutes or as grounds for termination of parental rights. Priority treatment policies are supportive and grant pregnant women priority access to substance use disorder treatment programs. Our empirical strategy relies on administrative data from 2008 to 2018 and a difference‐in‐differences framework that exploits the staggered implementation of these policies. We find that neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome increases by 10%–18% following the implementation of a punitive policy. This growth is accompanied by modest reductions in prenatal care, which may reflect deterrence from healthcare utilization. In contrast, priority treatment policies are associated with small reductions in low gestational age (2%) and low birth weight (2%), along with increases in prenatal care use. Taken together, our findings suggest that punitive approaches may be associated with unintended adverse pregnancy outcomes, and that supportive approaches may be more effective for improving perinatal health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9177792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91777922022-10-14 Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health Meinhofer, Angélica Witman, Allison Maclean, Johanna Catherine Bao, Yuhua Health Econ Research Articles We study the effect of punitive and priority treatment policies relating to illicit substance use during pregnancy on the rate of neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome, low birth weight, low gestational age, and prenatal care use. Punitive policies criminalize prenatal substance use, or define prenatal substance exposure as child maltreatment in child welfare statutes or as grounds for termination of parental rights. Priority treatment policies are supportive and grant pregnant women priority access to substance use disorder treatment programs. Our empirical strategy relies on administrative data from 2008 to 2018 and a difference‐in‐differences framework that exploits the staggered implementation of these policies. We find that neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome increases by 10%–18% following the implementation of a punitive policy. This growth is accompanied by modest reductions in prenatal care, which may reflect deterrence from healthcare utilization. In contrast, priority treatment policies are associated with small reductions in low gestational age (2%) and low birth weight (2%), along with increases in prenatal care use. Taken together, our findings suggest that punitive approaches may be associated with unintended adverse pregnancy outcomes, and that supportive approaches may be more effective for improving perinatal health. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-20 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9177792/ /pubmed/35445500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4518 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Meinhofer, Angélica Witman, Allison Maclean, Johanna Catherine Bao, Yuhua Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health |
title | Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health |
title_full | Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health |
title_fullStr | Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health |
title_full_unstemmed | Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health |
title_short | Prenatal substance use policies and newborn health |
title_sort | prenatal substance use policies and newborn health |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.4518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meinhoferangelica prenatalsubstanceusepoliciesandnewbornhealth AT witmanallison prenatalsubstanceusepoliciesandnewbornhealth AT macleanjohannacatherine prenatalsubstanceusepoliciesandnewbornhealth AT baoyuhua prenatalsubstanceusepoliciesandnewbornhealth |