Cargando…
Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials
Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men and a leading cause of cancer death. Determining a patient’s optimal therapy is a challenge, where oncologists must select a therapy with the highest likelihood of success and the lowest likelihood of toxicity. International standards for prognostic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w |
_version_ | 1784722936236605440 |
---|---|
author | Esteva, Andre Feng, Jean van der Wal, Douwe Huang, Shih-Cheng Simko, Jeffry P. DeVries, Sandy Chen, Emmalyn Schaeffer, Edward M. Morgan, Todd M. Sun, Yilun Ghorbani, Amirata Naik, Nikhil Nathawani, Dhruv Socher, Richard Michalski, Jeff M. Roach, Mack Pisansky, Thomas M. Monson, Jedidiah M. Naz, Farah Wallace, James Ferguson, Michelle J. Bahary, Jean-Paul Zou, James Lungren, Matthew Yeung, Serena Ross, Ashley E. Sandler, Howard M. Tran, Phuoc T. Spratt, Daniel E. Pugh, Stephanie Feng, Felix Y. Mohamad, Osama |
author_facet | Esteva, Andre Feng, Jean van der Wal, Douwe Huang, Shih-Cheng Simko, Jeffry P. DeVries, Sandy Chen, Emmalyn Schaeffer, Edward M. Morgan, Todd M. Sun, Yilun Ghorbani, Amirata Naik, Nikhil Nathawani, Dhruv Socher, Richard Michalski, Jeff M. Roach, Mack Pisansky, Thomas M. Monson, Jedidiah M. Naz, Farah Wallace, James Ferguson, Michelle J. Bahary, Jean-Paul Zou, James Lungren, Matthew Yeung, Serena Ross, Ashley E. Sandler, Howard M. Tran, Phuoc T. Spratt, Daniel E. Pugh, Stephanie Feng, Felix Y. Mohamad, Osama |
author_sort | Esteva, Andre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men and a leading cause of cancer death. Determining a patient’s optimal therapy is a challenge, where oncologists must select a therapy with the highest likelihood of success and the lowest likelihood of toxicity. International standards for prognostication rely on non-specific and semi-quantitative tools, commonly leading to over- and under-treatment. Tissue-based molecular biomarkers have attempted to address this, but most have limited validation in prospective randomized trials and expensive processing costs, posing substantial barriers to widespread adoption. There remains a significant need for accurate and scalable tools to support therapy personalization. Here we demonstrate prostate cancer therapy personalization by predicting long-term, clinically relevant outcomes using a multimodal deep learning architecture and train models using clinical data and digital histopathology from prostate biopsies. We train and validate models using five phase III randomized trials conducted across hundreds of clinical centers. Histopathological data was available for 5654 of 7764 randomized patients (71%) with a median follow-up of 11.4 years. Compared to the most common risk-stratification tool—risk groups developed by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN)—our models have superior discriminatory performance across all endpoints, ranging from 9.2% to 14.6% relative improvement in a held-out validation set. This artificial intelligence-based tool improves prognostication over standard tools and allows oncologists to computationally predict the likeliest outcomes of specific patients to determine optimal treatment. Outfitted with digital scanners and internet access, any clinic could offer such capabilities, enabling global access to therapy personalization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9177850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91778502022-06-10 Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials Esteva, Andre Feng, Jean van der Wal, Douwe Huang, Shih-Cheng Simko, Jeffry P. DeVries, Sandy Chen, Emmalyn Schaeffer, Edward M. Morgan, Todd M. Sun, Yilun Ghorbani, Amirata Naik, Nikhil Nathawani, Dhruv Socher, Richard Michalski, Jeff M. Roach, Mack Pisansky, Thomas M. Monson, Jedidiah M. Naz, Farah Wallace, James Ferguson, Michelle J. Bahary, Jean-Paul Zou, James Lungren, Matthew Yeung, Serena Ross, Ashley E. Sandler, Howard M. Tran, Phuoc T. Spratt, Daniel E. Pugh, Stephanie Feng, Felix Y. Mohamad, Osama NPJ Digit Med Article Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men and a leading cause of cancer death. Determining a patient’s optimal therapy is a challenge, where oncologists must select a therapy with the highest likelihood of success and the lowest likelihood of toxicity. International standards for prognostication rely on non-specific and semi-quantitative tools, commonly leading to over- and under-treatment. Tissue-based molecular biomarkers have attempted to address this, but most have limited validation in prospective randomized trials and expensive processing costs, posing substantial barriers to widespread adoption. There remains a significant need for accurate and scalable tools to support therapy personalization. Here we demonstrate prostate cancer therapy personalization by predicting long-term, clinically relevant outcomes using a multimodal deep learning architecture and train models using clinical data and digital histopathology from prostate biopsies. We train and validate models using five phase III randomized trials conducted across hundreds of clinical centers. Histopathological data was available for 5654 of 7764 randomized patients (71%) with a median follow-up of 11.4 years. Compared to the most common risk-stratification tool—risk groups developed by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN)—our models have superior discriminatory performance across all endpoints, ranging from 9.2% to 14.6% relative improvement in a held-out validation set. This artificial intelligence-based tool improves prognostication over standard tools and allows oncologists to computationally predict the likeliest outcomes of specific patients to determine optimal treatment. Outfitted with digital scanners and internet access, any clinic could offer such capabilities, enabling global access to therapy personalization. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9177850/ /pubmed/35676445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Esteva, Andre Feng, Jean van der Wal, Douwe Huang, Shih-Cheng Simko, Jeffry P. DeVries, Sandy Chen, Emmalyn Schaeffer, Edward M. Morgan, Todd M. Sun, Yilun Ghorbani, Amirata Naik, Nikhil Nathawani, Dhruv Socher, Richard Michalski, Jeff M. Roach, Mack Pisansky, Thomas M. Monson, Jedidiah M. Naz, Farah Wallace, James Ferguson, Michelle J. Bahary, Jean-Paul Zou, James Lungren, Matthew Yeung, Serena Ross, Ashley E. Sandler, Howard M. Tran, Phuoc T. Spratt, Daniel E. Pugh, Stephanie Feng, Felix Y. Mohamad, Osama Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials |
title | Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials |
title_full | Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials |
title_short | Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials |
title_sort | prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase iii clinical trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estevaandre prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT fengjean prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT vanderwaldouwe prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT huangshihcheng prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT simkojeffryp prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT devriessandy prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT chenemmalyn prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT schaefferedwardm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT morgantoddm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT sunyilun prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT ghorbaniamirata prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT naiknikhil prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT nathawanidhruv prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT socherrichard prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT michalskijeffm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT roachmack prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT pisanskythomasm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT monsonjedidiahm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT nazfarah prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT wallacejames prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT fergusonmichellej prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT baharyjeanpaul prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT zoujames prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT lungrenmatthew prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT yeungserena prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT rossashleye prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT sandlerhowardm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT tranphuoct prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT sprattdaniele prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT pughstephanie prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT fengfelixy prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials AT mohamadosama prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials |