Cargando…

Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials

Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men and a leading cause of cancer death. Determining a patient’s optimal therapy is a challenge, where oncologists must select a therapy with the highest likelihood of success and the lowest likelihood of toxicity. International standards for prognostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esteva, Andre, Feng, Jean, van der Wal, Douwe, Huang, Shih-Cheng, Simko, Jeffry P., DeVries, Sandy, Chen, Emmalyn, Schaeffer, Edward M., Morgan, Todd M., Sun, Yilun, Ghorbani, Amirata, Naik, Nikhil, Nathawani, Dhruv, Socher, Richard, Michalski, Jeff M., Roach, Mack, Pisansky, Thomas M., Monson, Jedidiah M., Naz, Farah, Wallace, James, Ferguson, Michelle J., Bahary, Jean-Paul, Zou, James, Lungren, Matthew, Yeung, Serena, Ross, Ashley E., Sandler, Howard M., Tran, Phuoc T., Spratt, Daniel E., Pugh, Stephanie, Feng, Felix Y., Mohamad, Osama
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w
_version_ 1784722936236605440
author Esteva, Andre
Feng, Jean
van der Wal, Douwe
Huang, Shih-Cheng
Simko, Jeffry P.
DeVries, Sandy
Chen, Emmalyn
Schaeffer, Edward M.
Morgan, Todd M.
Sun, Yilun
Ghorbani, Amirata
Naik, Nikhil
Nathawani, Dhruv
Socher, Richard
Michalski, Jeff M.
Roach, Mack
Pisansky, Thomas M.
Monson, Jedidiah M.
Naz, Farah
Wallace, James
Ferguson, Michelle J.
Bahary, Jean-Paul
Zou, James
Lungren, Matthew
Yeung, Serena
Ross, Ashley E.
Sandler, Howard M.
Tran, Phuoc T.
Spratt, Daniel E.
Pugh, Stephanie
Feng, Felix Y.
Mohamad, Osama
author_facet Esteva, Andre
Feng, Jean
van der Wal, Douwe
Huang, Shih-Cheng
Simko, Jeffry P.
DeVries, Sandy
Chen, Emmalyn
Schaeffer, Edward M.
Morgan, Todd M.
Sun, Yilun
Ghorbani, Amirata
Naik, Nikhil
Nathawani, Dhruv
Socher, Richard
Michalski, Jeff M.
Roach, Mack
Pisansky, Thomas M.
Monson, Jedidiah M.
Naz, Farah
Wallace, James
Ferguson, Michelle J.
Bahary, Jean-Paul
Zou, James
Lungren, Matthew
Yeung, Serena
Ross, Ashley E.
Sandler, Howard M.
Tran, Phuoc T.
Spratt, Daniel E.
Pugh, Stephanie
Feng, Felix Y.
Mohamad, Osama
author_sort Esteva, Andre
collection PubMed
description Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men and a leading cause of cancer death. Determining a patient’s optimal therapy is a challenge, where oncologists must select a therapy with the highest likelihood of success and the lowest likelihood of toxicity. International standards for prognostication rely on non-specific and semi-quantitative tools, commonly leading to over- and under-treatment. Tissue-based molecular biomarkers have attempted to address this, but most have limited validation in prospective randomized trials and expensive processing costs, posing substantial barriers to widespread adoption. There remains a significant need for accurate and scalable tools to support therapy personalization. Here we demonstrate prostate cancer therapy personalization by predicting long-term, clinically relevant outcomes using a multimodal deep learning architecture and train models using clinical data and digital histopathology from prostate biopsies. We train and validate models using five phase III randomized trials conducted across hundreds of clinical centers. Histopathological data was available for 5654 of 7764 randomized patients (71%) with a median follow-up of 11.4 years. Compared to the most common risk-stratification tool—risk groups developed by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN)—our models have superior discriminatory performance across all endpoints, ranging from 9.2% to 14.6% relative improvement in a held-out validation set. This artificial intelligence-based tool improves prognostication over standard tools and allows oncologists to computationally predict the likeliest outcomes of specific patients to determine optimal treatment. Outfitted with digital scanners and internet access, any clinic could offer such capabilities, enabling global access to therapy personalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9177850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91778502022-06-10 Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials Esteva, Andre Feng, Jean van der Wal, Douwe Huang, Shih-Cheng Simko, Jeffry P. DeVries, Sandy Chen, Emmalyn Schaeffer, Edward M. Morgan, Todd M. Sun, Yilun Ghorbani, Amirata Naik, Nikhil Nathawani, Dhruv Socher, Richard Michalski, Jeff M. Roach, Mack Pisansky, Thomas M. Monson, Jedidiah M. Naz, Farah Wallace, James Ferguson, Michelle J. Bahary, Jean-Paul Zou, James Lungren, Matthew Yeung, Serena Ross, Ashley E. Sandler, Howard M. Tran, Phuoc T. Spratt, Daniel E. Pugh, Stephanie Feng, Felix Y. Mohamad, Osama NPJ Digit Med Article Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men and a leading cause of cancer death. Determining a patient’s optimal therapy is a challenge, where oncologists must select a therapy with the highest likelihood of success and the lowest likelihood of toxicity. International standards for prognostication rely on non-specific and semi-quantitative tools, commonly leading to over- and under-treatment. Tissue-based molecular biomarkers have attempted to address this, but most have limited validation in prospective randomized trials and expensive processing costs, posing substantial barriers to widespread adoption. There remains a significant need for accurate and scalable tools to support therapy personalization. Here we demonstrate prostate cancer therapy personalization by predicting long-term, clinically relevant outcomes using a multimodal deep learning architecture and train models using clinical data and digital histopathology from prostate biopsies. We train and validate models using five phase III randomized trials conducted across hundreds of clinical centers. Histopathological data was available for 5654 of 7764 randomized patients (71%) with a median follow-up of 11.4 years. Compared to the most common risk-stratification tool—risk groups developed by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN)—our models have superior discriminatory performance across all endpoints, ranging from 9.2% to 14.6% relative improvement in a held-out validation set. This artificial intelligence-based tool improves prognostication over standard tools and allows oncologists to computationally predict the likeliest outcomes of specific patients to determine optimal treatment. Outfitted with digital scanners and internet access, any clinic could offer such capabilities, enabling global access to therapy personalization. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9177850/ /pubmed/35676445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Esteva, Andre
Feng, Jean
van der Wal, Douwe
Huang, Shih-Cheng
Simko, Jeffry P.
DeVries, Sandy
Chen, Emmalyn
Schaeffer, Edward M.
Morgan, Todd M.
Sun, Yilun
Ghorbani, Amirata
Naik, Nikhil
Nathawani, Dhruv
Socher, Richard
Michalski, Jeff M.
Roach, Mack
Pisansky, Thomas M.
Monson, Jedidiah M.
Naz, Farah
Wallace, James
Ferguson, Michelle J.
Bahary, Jean-Paul
Zou, James
Lungren, Matthew
Yeung, Serena
Ross, Ashley E.
Sandler, Howard M.
Tran, Phuoc T.
Spratt, Daniel E.
Pugh, Stephanie
Feng, Felix Y.
Mohamad, Osama
Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials
title Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials
title_full Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials
title_fullStr Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials
title_short Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials
title_sort prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase iii clinical trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35676445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w
work_keys_str_mv AT estevaandre prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT fengjean prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT vanderwaldouwe prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT huangshihcheng prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT simkojeffryp prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT devriessandy prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT chenemmalyn prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT schaefferedwardm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT morgantoddm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT sunyilun prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT ghorbaniamirata prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT naiknikhil prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT nathawanidhruv prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT socherrichard prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT michalskijeffm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT roachmack prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT pisanskythomasm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT monsonjedidiahm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT nazfarah prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT wallacejames prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT fergusonmichellej prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT baharyjeanpaul prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT zoujames prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT lungrenmatthew prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT yeungserena prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT rossashleye prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT sandlerhowardm prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT tranphuoct prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT sprattdaniele prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT pughstephanie prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT fengfelixy prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials
AT mohamadosama prostatecancertherapypersonalizationviamultimodaldeeplearningonrandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrials