Cargando…

Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation

The aim of the present study was to evaluate motor area mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) compared with electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). Motor mapping with fMRI and ECS were retrospectively compared in seven patients with refractory epilepsy in which the primary motor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: IMATAKA, Seiichiro, ENATSU, Rei, HIRANO, Tsukasa, SASAGAWA, Ayaka, ARIHARA, Masayasu, KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi, OCHI, Satoko, MIKUNI, Nobuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296585
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0247
_version_ 1784722985862561792
author IMATAKA, Seiichiro
ENATSU, Rei
HIRANO, Tsukasa
SASAGAWA, Ayaka
ARIHARA, Masayasu
KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi
OCHI, Satoko
MIKUNI, Nobuhiro
author_facet IMATAKA, Seiichiro
ENATSU, Rei
HIRANO, Tsukasa
SASAGAWA, Ayaka
ARIHARA, Masayasu
KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi
OCHI, Satoko
MIKUNI, Nobuhiro
author_sort IMATAKA, Seiichiro
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to evaluate motor area mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) compared with electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). Motor mapping with fMRI and ECS were retrospectively compared in seven patients with refractory epilepsy in which the primary motor (M1) areas were identified by fMRI and ECS mapping between 2012 and 2019. A right finger tapping task was used for fMRI motor mapping. Blood oxygen level-dependent activation was detected in the left precentral gyrus (PreCG)/postcentral gyrus (PostCG) along the “hand knob” of the central sulcus in all seven patients. Bilateral supplementary motor areas (SMAs) were also activated (n = 6), and the cerebellar hemisphere showed activation on the right side (n = 3) and bilateral side (n = 4). Furthermore, the premotor area (PM) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) were also activated on the left side (n = 1) and bilateral sides (n = 2). The M1 and sensory area (S1) detected by ECS included fMRI-activated PreCG/PostCG areas with broader extent. This study showed that fMRI motor mapping was locationally well correlated to the activation of M1/S1 by ECS, but the spatial extent was not concordant. In addition, the involvement of SMA, PM/PPC, and the cerebellum in simple voluntary movement was also suggested. Combination analysis of fMRI and ECS motor mapping contributes to precise localization of M1/S1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9178115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91781152022-07-05 Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation IMATAKA, Seiichiro ENATSU, Rei HIRANO, Tsukasa SASAGAWA, Ayaka ARIHARA, Masayasu KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi OCHI, Satoko MIKUNI, Nobuhiro Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Original Article The aim of the present study was to evaluate motor area mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) compared with electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). Motor mapping with fMRI and ECS were retrospectively compared in seven patients with refractory epilepsy in which the primary motor (M1) areas were identified by fMRI and ECS mapping between 2012 and 2019. A right finger tapping task was used for fMRI motor mapping. Blood oxygen level-dependent activation was detected in the left precentral gyrus (PreCG)/postcentral gyrus (PostCG) along the “hand knob” of the central sulcus in all seven patients. Bilateral supplementary motor areas (SMAs) were also activated (n = 6), and the cerebellar hemisphere showed activation on the right side (n = 3) and bilateral side (n = 4). Furthermore, the premotor area (PM) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) were also activated on the left side (n = 1) and bilateral sides (n = 2). The M1 and sensory area (S1) detected by ECS included fMRI-activated PreCG/PostCG areas with broader extent. This study showed that fMRI motor mapping was locationally well correlated to the activation of M1/S1 by ECS, but the spatial extent was not concordant. In addition, the involvement of SMA, PM/PPC, and the cerebellum in simple voluntary movement was also suggested. Combination analysis of fMRI and ECS motor mapping contributes to precise localization of M1/S1. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9178115/ /pubmed/35296585 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0247 Text en © 2022 The Japan Neurosurgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License.
spellingShingle Original Article
IMATAKA, Seiichiro
ENATSU, Rei
HIRANO, Tsukasa
SASAGAWA, Ayaka
ARIHARA, Masayasu
KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi
OCHI, Satoko
MIKUNI, Nobuhiro
Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation
title Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation
title_full Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation
title_fullStr Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation
title_short Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation
title_sort motor mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with electrical cortical stimulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296585
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0247
work_keys_str_mv AT imatakaseiichiro motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation
AT enatsurei motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation
AT hiranotsukasa motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation
AT sasagawaayaka motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation
AT ariharamasayasu motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation
AT kuribaratomoyoshi motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation
AT ochisatoko motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation
AT mikuninobuhiro motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation