Cargando…
Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation
The aim of the present study was to evaluate motor area mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) compared with electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). Motor mapping with fMRI and ECS were retrospectively compared in seven patients with refractory epilepsy in which the primary motor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japan Neurosurgical Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296585 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0247 |
_version_ | 1784722985862561792 |
---|---|
author | IMATAKA, Seiichiro ENATSU, Rei HIRANO, Tsukasa SASAGAWA, Ayaka ARIHARA, Masayasu KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi OCHI, Satoko MIKUNI, Nobuhiro |
author_facet | IMATAKA, Seiichiro ENATSU, Rei HIRANO, Tsukasa SASAGAWA, Ayaka ARIHARA, Masayasu KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi OCHI, Satoko MIKUNI, Nobuhiro |
author_sort | IMATAKA, Seiichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to evaluate motor area mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) compared with electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). Motor mapping with fMRI and ECS were retrospectively compared in seven patients with refractory epilepsy in which the primary motor (M1) areas were identified by fMRI and ECS mapping between 2012 and 2019. A right finger tapping task was used for fMRI motor mapping. Blood oxygen level-dependent activation was detected in the left precentral gyrus (PreCG)/postcentral gyrus (PostCG) along the “hand knob” of the central sulcus in all seven patients. Bilateral supplementary motor areas (SMAs) were also activated (n = 6), and the cerebellar hemisphere showed activation on the right side (n = 3) and bilateral side (n = 4). Furthermore, the premotor area (PM) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) were also activated on the left side (n = 1) and bilateral sides (n = 2). The M1 and sensory area (S1) detected by ECS included fMRI-activated PreCG/PostCG areas with broader extent. This study showed that fMRI motor mapping was locationally well correlated to the activation of M1/S1 by ECS, but the spatial extent was not concordant. In addition, the involvement of SMA, PM/PPC, and the cerebellum in simple voluntary movement was also suggested. Combination analysis of fMRI and ECS motor mapping contributes to precise localization of M1/S1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9178115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Japan Neurosurgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91781152022-07-05 Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation IMATAKA, Seiichiro ENATSU, Rei HIRANO, Tsukasa SASAGAWA, Ayaka ARIHARA, Masayasu KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi OCHI, Satoko MIKUNI, Nobuhiro Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Original Article The aim of the present study was to evaluate motor area mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) compared with electrical cortical stimulation (ECS). Motor mapping with fMRI and ECS were retrospectively compared in seven patients with refractory epilepsy in which the primary motor (M1) areas were identified by fMRI and ECS mapping between 2012 and 2019. A right finger tapping task was used for fMRI motor mapping. Blood oxygen level-dependent activation was detected in the left precentral gyrus (PreCG)/postcentral gyrus (PostCG) along the “hand knob” of the central sulcus in all seven patients. Bilateral supplementary motor areas (SMAs) were also activated (n = 6), and the cerebellar hemisphere showed activation on the right side (n = 3) and bilateral side (n = 4). Furthermore, the premotor area (PM) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) were also activated on the left side (n = 1) and bilateral sides (n = 2). The M1 and sensory area (S1) detected by ECS included fMRI-activated PreCG/PostCG areas with broader extent. This study showed that fMRI motor mapping was locationally well correlated to the activation of M1/S1 by ECS, but the spatial extent was not concordant. In addition, the involvement of SMA, PM/PPC, and the cerebellum in simple voluntary movement was also suggested. Combination analysis of fMRI and ECS motor mapping contributes to precise localization of M1/S1. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9178115/ /pubmed/35296585 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0247 Text en © 2022 The Japan Neurosurgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article IMATAKA, Seiichiro ENATSU, Rei HIRANO, Tsukasa SASAGAWA, Ayaka ARIHARA, Masayasu KURIBARA, Tomoyoshi OCHI, Satoko MIKUNI, Nobuhiro Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation |
title | Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation |
title_full | Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation |
title_fullStr | Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation |
title_short | Motor Mapping with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison with Electrical Cortical Stimulation |
title_sort | motor mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with electrical cortical stimulation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296585 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imatakaseiichiro motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation AT enatsurei motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation AT hiranotsukasa motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation AT sasagawaayaka motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation AT ariharamasayasu motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation AT kuribaratomoyoshi motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation AT ochisatoko motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation AT mikuninobuhiro motormappingwithfunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonwithelectricalcorticalstimulation |