Cargando…
Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic method for colorectal neoplasia, allowing detection and resection of adenomatous polyps; however, significant proportions of adenomas are missed. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in endoscopy are currently available to help identify...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545215 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.228 |
_version_ | 1784722989819887616 |
---|---|
author | Sivananthan, Arun Nazarian, Scarlet Ayaru, Lakshmana Patel, Kinesh Ashrafian, Hutan Darzi, Ara Patel, Nisha |
author_facet | Sivananthan, Arun Nazarian, Scarlet Ayaru, Lakshmana Patel, Kinesh Ashrafian, Hutan Darzi, Ara Patel, Nisha |
author_sort | Sivananthan, Arun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic method for colorectal neoplasia, allowing detection and resection of adenomatous polyps; however, significant proportions of adenomas are missed. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in endoscopy are currently available to help identify lesions. Diminutive (≤5 mm) and nonpedunculated polyps are most commonly missed. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether CADe systems can improve the real-time detection of these commonly missed lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials evaluating CADe systems categorized by morphology and lesion size were included. The mean number of polyps and adenomas per patient was derived. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven studies, including 2,595 CADe-assisted colonoscopies and 2,622 conventional colonoscopies, were analyzed. CADe-assisted colonoscopy demonstrated an 80% increase in the mean number of diminutive adenomas detected per patient compared with conventional colonoscopy (0.31 vs. 0.17; effect size, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.18); it also demonstrated a 91.7% increase in the mean number of nonpedunculated adenomas detected per patient (0.32 vs. 0.19; effect size, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02–0.07). CONCLUSIONS: CADe-assisted endoscopy significantly improved the detection of most commonly missed adenomas. Although this method is a potentially exciting technology, limitations still apply to current data, prompting the need for further real-time studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9178131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91781312022-06-14 Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis Sivananthan, Arun Nazarian, Scarlet Ayaru, Lakshmana Patel, Kinesh Ashrafian, Hutan Darzi, Ara Patel, Nisha Clin Endosc Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic method for colorectal neoplasia, allowing detection and resection of adenomatous polyps; however, significant proportions of adenomas are missed. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in endoscopy are currently available to help identify lesions. Diminutive (≤5 mm) and nonpedunculated polyps are most commonly missed. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether CADe systems can improve the real-time detection of these commonly missed lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials evaluating CADe systems categorized by morphology and lesion size were included. The mean number of polyps and adenomas per patient was derived. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven studies, including 2,595 CADe-assisted colonoscopies and 2,622 conventional colonoscopies, were analyzed. CADe-assisted colonoscopy demonstrated an 80% increase in the mean number of diminutive adenomas detected per patient compared with conventional colonoscopy (0.31 vs. 0.17; effect size, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.18); it also demonstrated a 91.7% increase in the mean number of nonpedunculated adenomas detected per patient (0.32 vs. 0.19; effect size, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02–0.07). CONCLUSIONS: CADe-assisted endoscopy significantly improved the detection of most commonly missed adenomas. Although this method is a potentially exciting technology, limitations still apply to current data, prompting the need for further real-time studies. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-05 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9178131/ /pubmed/35545215 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.228 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sivananthan, Arun Nazarian, Scarlet Ayaru, Lakshmana Patel, Kinesh Ashrafian, Hutan Darzi, Ara Patel, Nisha Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis |
title | Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis |
title_full | Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis |
title_short | Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis |
title_sort | does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? a meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545215 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sivananthanarun doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis AT nazarianscarlet doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis AT ayarulakshmana doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis AT patelkinesh doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis AT ashrafianhutan doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis AT darziara doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis AT patelnisha doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis |