Cargando…

Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic method for colorectal neoplasia, allowing detection and resection of adenomatous polyps; however, significant proportions of adenomas are missed. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in endoscopy are currently available to help identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivananthan, Arun, Nazarian, Scarlet, Ayaru, Lakshmana, Patel, Kinesh, Ashrafian, Hutan, Darzi, Ara, Patel, Nisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545215
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.228
_version_ 1784722989819887616
author Sivananthan, Arun
Nazarian, Scarlet
Ayaru, Lakshmana
Patel, Kinesh
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
Patel, Nisha
author_facet Sivananthan, Arun
Nazarian, Scarlet
Ayaru, Lakshmana
Patel, Kinesh
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
Patel, Nisha
author_sort Sivananthan, Arun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic method for colorectal neoplasia, allowing detection and resection of adenomatous polyps; however, significant proportions of adenomas are missed. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in endoscopy are currently available to help identify lesions. Diminutive (≤5 mm) and nonpedunculated polyps are most commonly missed. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether CADe systems can improve the real-time detection of these commonly missed lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials evaluating CADe systems categorized by morphology and lesion size were included. The mean number of polyps and adenomas per patient was derived. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven studies, including 2,595 CADe-assisted colonoscopies and 2,622 conventional colonoscopies, were analyzed. CADe-assisted colonoscopy demonstrated an 80% increase in the mean number of diminutive adenomas detected per patient compared with conventional colonoscopy (0.31 vs. 0.17; effect size, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.18); it also demonstrated a 91.7% increase in the mean number of nonpedunculated adenomas detected per patient (0.32 vs. 0.19; effect size, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02–0.07). CONCLUSIONS: CADe-assisted endoscopy significantly improved the detection of most commonly missed adenomas. Although this method is a potentially exciting technology, limitations still apply to current data, prompting the need for further real-time studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9178131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91781312022-06-14 Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis Sivananthan, Arun Nazarian, Scarlet Ayaru, Lakshmana Patel, Kinesh Ashrafian, Hutan Darzi, Ara Patel, Nisha Clin Endosc Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic method for colorectal neoplasia, allowing detection and resection of adenomatous polyps; however, significant proportions of adenomas are missed. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in endoscopy are currently available to help identify lesions. Diminutive (≤5 mm) and nonpedunculated polyps are most commonly missed. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether CADe systems can improve the real-time detection of these commonly missed lesions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials evaluating CADe systems categorized by morphology and lesion size were included. The mean number of polyps and adenomas per patient was derived. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling. RESULTS: Seven studies, including 2,595 CADe-assisted colonoscopies and 2,622 conventional colonoscopies, were analyzed. CADe-assisted colonoscopy demonstrated an 80% increase in the mean number of diminutive adenomas detected per patient compared with conventional colonoscopy (0.31 vs. 0.17; effect size, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.18); it also demonstrated a 91.7% increase in the mean number of nonpedunculated adenomas detected per patient (0.32 vs. 0.19; effect size, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02–0.07). CONCLUSIONS: CADe-assisted endoscopy significantly improved the detection of most commonly missed adenomas. Although this method is a potentially exciting technology, limitations still apply to current data, prompting the need for further real-time studies. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-05 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9178131/ /pubmed/35545215 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.228 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sivananthan, Arun
Nazarian, Scarlet
Ayaru, Lakshmana
Patel, Kinesh
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
Patel, Nisha
Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis
title Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis
title_full Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis
title_short Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis
title_sort does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? a meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545215
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.228
work_keys_str_mv AT sivananthanarun doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis
AT nazarianscarlet doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis
AT ayarulakshmana doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis
AT patelkinesh doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis
AT ashrafianhutan doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis
AT darziara doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis
AT patelnisha doescomputeraideddiagnosticendoscopyimprovethedetectionofcommonlymissedpolypsametaanalysis