Cargando…

Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality

Continuous measurement of quality indicators (QIs) should be a routine part of colonoscopy, as a wide variation still exists in the performance and quality levels of colonoscopy in Korea. Among the many QIs of colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate, average withdrawal time, bowel preparation adequa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Su Bee, Cha, Jae Myung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656625
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.037
_version_ 1784722990853783552
author Park, Su Bee
Cha, Jae Myung
author_facet Park, Su Bee
Cha, Jae Myung
author_sort Park, Su Bee
collection PubMed
description Continuous measurement of quality indicators (QIs) should be a routine part of colonoscopy, as a wide variation still exists in the performance and quality levels of colonoscopy in Korea. Among the many QIs of colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate, average withdrawal time, bowel preparation adequacy, and cecal intubation rate should be monitored in daily clinical practice to improve the quality of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate is the best indicator of the quality of colonoscopy; however, it has many limitations for universal use in daily practice. With the development of natural language processing, the adenoma detection rate is expected to become more effective and useful. It is important that colonoscopists do not strictly and mechanically maintain an average withdrawal time of 6 minutes but instead perform careful colonoscopy to maximally expose the colonic mucosa with a withdrawal time of at least 6 minutes. To achieve adequate bowel preparation, documentation of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) should be a routine part of colonoscopy. When colonoscopists routinely followed the bowel preparation protocols, ≥85% of outpatient screening colonoscopies had a BBPS score of ≥6. In addition, the cecal intubation rate should be ≥95% of all screening colonoscopies. The first step in improving colonoscopy quality in Korea is to apply these key performance measurements in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9178135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91781352022-06-14 Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality Park, Su Bee Cha, Jae Myung Clin Endosc Review Continuous measurement of quality indicators (QIs) should be a routine part of colonoscopy, as a wide variation still exists in the performance and quality levels of colonoscopy in Korea. Among the many QIs of colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate, average withdrawal time, bowel preparation adequacy, and cecal intubation rate should be monitored in daily clinical practice to improve the quality of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate is the best indicator of the quality of colonoscopy; however, it has many limitations for universal use in daily practice. With the development of natural language processing, the adenoma detection rate is expected to become more effective and useful. It is important that colonoscopists do not strictly and mechanically maintain an average withdrawal time of 6 minutes but instead perform careful colonoscopy to maximally expose the colonic mucosa with a withdrawal time of at least 6 minutes. To achieve adequate bowel preparation, documentation of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) should be a routine part of colonoscopy. When colonoscopists routinely followed the bowel preparation protocols, ≥85% of outpatient screening colonoscopies had a BBPS score of ≥6. In addition, the cecal intubation rate should be ≥95% of all screening colonoscopies. The first step in improving colonoscopy quality in Korea is to apply these key performance measurements in clinical practice. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-05 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9178135/ /pubmed/35656625 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.037 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Park, Su Bee
Cha, Jae Myung
Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
title Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
title_full Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
title_fullStr Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
title_short Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
title_sort quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656625
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.037
work_keys_str_mv AT parksubee qualityindicatorsincolonoscopythechasmbetweenidealandreality
AT chajaemyung qualityindicatorsincolonoscopythechasmbetweenidealandreality