Cargando…
Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases?
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgeons and endoscopists have started to use endoscopically inserted double pigtail stents (DPTs) in the management of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) leaks, including UGI anastomotic leaks. We investigated our own experiences in this patient population. METHODS: From March 2017 to Ju...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986605 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.197 |
_version_ | 1784722993581129728 |
---|---|
author | Toh, Bin Chet Chong, Jingli Yeung, Baldwin PM Lim, Chin Hong Lim, Eugene KW Chan, Weng Hoong Tan, Jeremy TH |
author_facet | Toh, Bin Chet Chong, Jingli Yeung, Baldwin PM Lim, Chin Hong Lim, Eugene KW Chan, Weng Hoong Tan, Jeremy TH |
author_sort | Toh, Bin Chet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgeons and endoscopists have started to use endoscopically inserted double pigtail stents (DPTs) in the management of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) leaks, including UGI anastomotic leaks. We investigated our own experiences in this patient population. METHODS: From March 2017 to June 2020, 12 patients had endoscopic internal drainage of a radiologically proven anastomotic leak after UGI surgery in two tertiary UGI centers. The primary outcome measure was the time to removal of the DPTs after anastomotic healing. The secondary outcome measure was early oral feeding after DPT insertion. RESULTS: Eight of the 12 patients (67%) required only one DPT, whereas four (33%) required two DPTs. The median duration of drainage was 42 days. Two patients required surgery due to inadequate control of sepsis. Of the remaining 10 patients, nine did not require a change in DPT before anastomotic healing. Nine patients were allowed oral fluids within the 1st week and a soft diet in the 2nd week. One patient was allowed clear oral feeds on the 8th day after DPT insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic internal drainage is becoming an established minimally invasive technique for controlling anastomotic leak after UGI surgery. It allows for early oral nutritional feeding and minimizes discomfort from conventional external drainage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9178146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91781462022-06-14 Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? Toh, Bin Chet Chong, Jingli Yeung, Baldwin PM Lim, Chin Hong Lim, Eugene KW Chan, Weng Hoong Tan, Jeremy TH Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgeons and endoscopists have started to use endoscopically inserted double pigtail stents (DPTs) in the management of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) leaks, including UGI anastomotic leaks. We investigated our own experiences in this patient population. METHODS: From March 2017 to June 2020, 12 patients had endoscopic internal drainage of a radiologically proven anastomotic leak after UGI surgery in two tertiary UGI centers. The primary outcome measure was the time to removal of the DPTs after anastomotic healing. The secondary outcome measure was early oral feeding after DPT insertion. RESULTS: Eight of the 12 patients (67%) required only one DPT, whereas four (33%) required two DPTs. The median duration of drainage was 42 days. Two patients required surgery due to inadequate control of sepsis. Of the remaining 10 patients, nine did not require a change in DPT before anastomotic healing. Nine patients were allowed oral fluids within the 1st week and a soft diet in the 2nd week. One patient was allowed clear oral feeds on the 8th day after DPT insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic internal drainage is becoming an established minimally invasive technique for controlling anastomotic leak after UGI surgery. It allows for early oral nutritional feeding and minimizes discomfort from conventional external drainage. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-05 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9178146/ /pubmed/34986605 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.197 Text en © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Toh, Bin Chet Chong, Jingli Yeung, Baldwin PM Lim, Chin Hong Lim, Eugene KW Chan, Weng Hoong Tan, Jeremy TH Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? |
title | Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? |
title_full | Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? |
title_short | Endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? |
title_sort | endoscopic internal drainage with double pigtail stents for upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: suitable for all cases? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34986605 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tohbinchet endoscopicinternaldrainagewithdoublepigtailstentsforuppergastrointestinalanastomoticleakssuitableforallcases AT chongjingli endoscopicinternaldrainagewithdoublepigtailstentsforuppergastrointestinalanastomoticleakssuitableforallcases AT yeungbaldwinpm endoscopicinternaldrainagewithdoublepigtailstentsforuppergastrointestinalanastomoticleakssuitableforallcases AT limchinhong endoscopicinternaldrainagewithdoublepigtailstentsforuppergastrointestinalanastomoticleakssuitableforallcases AT limeugenekw endoscopicinternaldrainagewithdoublepigtailstentsforuppergastrointestinalanastomoticleakssuitableforallcases AT chanwenghoong endoscopicinternaldrainagewithdoublepigtailstentsforuppergastrointestinalanastomoticleakssuitableforallcases AT tanjeremyth endoscopicinternaldrainagewithdoublepigtailstentsforuppergastrointestinalanastomoticleakssuitableforallcases |