Cargando…

Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women. Numerous studies explored cell-free circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers of BC. As inconsistent and rarely intersecting microRNA panels have been reported thus far, we aim to evaluate the overall diagnostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sehovic, Emir, Urru, Sara, Chiorino, Giovanna, Doebler, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09698-8
_version_ 1784723153330634752
author Sehovic, Emir
Urru, Sara
Chiorino, Giovanna
Doebler, Philipp
author_facet Sehovic, Emir
Urru, Sara
Chiorino, Giovanna
Doebler, Philipp
author_sort Sehovic, Emir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women. Numerous studies explored cell-free circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers of BC. As inconsistent and rarely intersecting microRNA panels have been reported thus far, we aim to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance as well as the sources of heterogeneity between studies. METHODS: Based on the search of three online search engines performed up to March 21(st) 2022, 56 eligible publications that investigated diagnostic circulating microRNAs by utilizing Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) were obtained. Primary studies’ potential for bias was evaluated with the revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). A bivariate generalized linear mixed-effects model was applied to obtain pooled sensitivity and specificity. A novel methodology was utilized in which the sample and study models’ characteristics were analysed to determine the potential preference of studies for sensitivity or specificity. RESULTS: Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 [0.81—0.88] and 0.83 [0.79—0.87] were obtained, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly better performance of multiple (sensitivity: 0.90 [0.86—0.93]; specificity: 0.86 [0.80—0.90]) vs single (sensitivity: 0.82 [0.77—0.86], specificity: 0.83 [0.78—0.87]) microRNA panels and a comparable pooled diagnostic performance between studies using serum (sensitivity: 0.87 [0.81—0.91]; specificity: 0.83 [0.78—0.87]) and plasma (sensitivity: 0.83 [0.77—0.87]; specificity: 0.85 [0.78—0.91]) as specimen type. In addition, based on bivariate and univariate analyses, miRNA(s) based on endogenous normalizers tend to have a higher diagnostic performance than miRNA(s) based on exogenous ones. Moreover, a slight tendency of studies to prefer specificity over sensitivity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the diagnostic ability of circulating microRNAs to diagnose BC was reaffirmed. Nonetheless, some subgroup analyses showed between-study heterogeneity. Finally, lack of standardization and of result reproducibility remain the biggest issues regarding the diagnostic application of circulating cell-free microRNAs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09698-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9178880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91788802022-06-10 Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection Sehovic, Emir Urru, Sara Chiorino, Giovanna Doebler, Philipp BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women. Numerous studies explored cell-free circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers of BC. As inconsistent and rarely intersecting microRNA panels have been reported thus far, we aim to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance as well as the sources of heterogeneity between studies. METHODS: Based on the search of three online search engines performed up to March 21(st) 2022, 56 eligible publications that investigated diagnostic circulating microRNAs by utilizing Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) were obtained. Primary studies’ potential for bias was evaluated with the revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). A bivariate generalized linear mixed-effects model was applied to obtain pooled sensitivity and specificity. A novel methodology was utilized in which the sample and study models’ characteristics were analysed to determine the potential preference of studies for sensitivity or specificity. RESULTS: Pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 [0.81—0.88] and 0.83 [0.79—0.87] were obtained, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significantly better performance of multiple (sensitivity: 0.90 [0.86—0.93]; specificity: 0.86 [0.80—0.90]) vs single (sensitivity: 0.82 [0.77—0.86], specificity: 0.83 [0.78—0.87]) microRNA panels and a comparable pooled diagnostic performance between studies using serum (sensitivity: 0.87 [0.81—0.91]; specificity: 0.83 [0.78—0.87]) and plasma (sensitivity: 0.83 [0.77—0.87]; specificity: 0.85 [0.78—0.91]) as specimen type. In addition, based on bivariate and univariate analyses, miRNA(s) based on endogenous normalizers tend to have a higher diagnostic performance than miRNA(s) based on exogenous ones. Moreover, a slight tendency of studies to prefer specificity over sensitivity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the diagnostic ability of circulating microRNAs to diagnose BC was reaffirmed. Nonetheless, some subgroup analyses showed between-study heterogeneity. Finally, lack of standardization and of result reproducibility remain the biggest issues regarding the diagnostic application of circulating cell-free microRNAs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09698-8. BioMed Central 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9178880/ /pubmed/35681127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09698-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sehovic, Emir
Urru, Sara
Chiorino, Giovanna
Doebler, Philipp
Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection
title Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection
title_full Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection
title_short Meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating microRNAs for breast cancer detection
title_sort meta-analysis of diagnostic cell-free circulating micrornas for breast cancer detection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09698-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sehovicemir metaanalysisofdiagnosticcellfreecirculatingmicrornasforbreastcancerdetection
AT urrusara metaanalysisofdiagnosticcellfreecirculatingmicrornasforbreastcancerdetection
AT chiorinogiovanna metaanalysisofdiagnosticcellfreecirculatingmicrornasforbreastcancerdetection
AT doeblerphilipp metaanalysisofdiagnosticcellfreecirculatingmicrornasforbreastcancerdetection