Cargando…

Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the retention and loss of retention after fatigue testing at different time intervals between two types of bar clip materials (digitally designed PEEK bar clip and regular Nylon bar clip). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An epoxy model was constructed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassar, Hossam I., Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02262-7
_version_ 1784723153819271168
author Nassar, Hossam I.
Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh
author_facet Nassar, Hossam I.
Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh
author_sort Nassar, Hossam I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the retention and loss of retention after fatigue testing at different time intervals between two types of bar clip materials (digitally designed PEEK bar clip and regular Nylon bar clip). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An epoxy model was constructed for a completely edentulous mandible. Two implants were placed according to prosthetically driven implant placement by a computer-guided surgical stent. Bar clips were digitally designed, 3D printed, and pressed into Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK). Pick up of PEEK and nylon clips was performed on the dentures fitting surface using self-cured acrylic resin. Each study group was subjected to an insertion and removal fatigue test simulating 3 years of patient usage. Retention values were recorded using the universal testing machine at initial retention and after 1, 2, and 3 years of simulated usage. For proper sample sizing, 24 models and dentures (12 for each group) were used. An independent sample t-test and repeated measures analysis of variance were used to compare the data. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in retention between the PEEK and nylon bar clips at the beginning of the experiment (p = 0.000*). But after 3 years of simulated use, there was no significant difference in retention between the test groups (p = 0.055, NS). After 3 years of simulated use, the retention of PEEK clips decreased by − 58.66% recording 17.37 ± 1.07 N, while the retention of nylon clip increased by + 2.99% recording 16.56 ± 0.88 N. CONCLUSION: The digitally designed PEEK clip showed comparable retention results to the nylon clip after 3 years of simulated use. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maintenance of bar attachment with PEEK clip offers a clinical solution after the wear of normal plastic clips, which is a cheap solution that is easily fabricated and picked up into the denture. Digital fabricated PEEK bar retentive inserts can be used in cases of bar attachment wear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9178882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91788822022-06-10 Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture Nassar, Hossam I. Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh BMC Oral Health Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the retention and loss of retention after fatigue testing at different time intervals between two types of bar clip materials (digitally designed PEEK bar clip and regular Nylon bar clip). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An epoxy model was constructed for a completely edentulous mandible. Two implants were placed according to prosthetically driven implant placement by a computer-guided surgical stent. Bar clips were digitally designed, 3D printed, and pressed into Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK). Pick up of PEEK and nylon clips was performed on the dentures fitting surface using self-cured acrylic resin. Each study group was subjected to an insertion and removal fatigue test simulating 3 years of patient usage. Retention values were recorded using the universal testing machine at initial retention and after 1, 2, and 3 years of simulated usage. For proper sample sizing, 24 models and dentures (12 for each group) were used. An independent sample t-test and repeated measures analysis of variance were used to compare the data. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in retention between the PEEK and nylon bar clips at the beginning of the experiment (p = 0.000*). But after 3 years of simulated use, there was no significant difference in retention between the test groups (p = 0.055, NS). After 3 years of simulated use, the retention of PEEK clips decreased by − 58.66% recording 17.37 ± 1.07 N, while the retention of nylon clip increased by + 2.99% recording 16.56 ± 0.88 N. CONCLUSION: The digitally designed PEEK clip showed comparable retention results to the nylon clip after 3 years of simulated use. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maintenance of bar attachment with PEEK clip offers a clinical solution after the wear of normal plastic clips, which is a cheap solution that is easily fabricated and picked up into the denture. Digital fabricated PEEK bar retentive inserts can be used in cases of bar attachment wear. BioMed Central 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9178882/ /pubmed/35681163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02262-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nassar, Hossam I.
Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh
Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
title Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
title_full Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
title_fullStr Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
title_full_unstemmed Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
title_short Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
title_sort retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9178882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02262-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nassarhossami retentionofbarclipattachmentformandibularimplantoverdenture
AT abdelazizmedhatsameh retentionofbarclipattachmentformandibularimplantoverdenture