Cargando…

Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility and safety of the surgical resection of presacral tumors via a transsacrococcygeal transverse incision. METHODS: The clinical data and prognoses of patients with presacral tumors who underwent surgery at the Chinese People’s Lib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xudong, Zhou, Sixin, Liu, Na, Li, Peiyu, Chen, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9179022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.892027
_version_ 1784723179310153728
author Zhao, Xudong
Zhou, Sixin
Liu, Na
Li, Peiyu
Chen, Lin
author_facet Zhao, Xudong
Zhou, Sixin
Liu, Na
Li, Peiyu
Chen, Lin
author_sort Zhao, Xudong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility and safety of the surgical resection of presacral tumors via a transsacrococcygeal transverse incision. METHODS: The clinical data and prognoses of patients with presacral tumors who underwent surgery at the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with presacral tumors were included in this study, including 82 female patients and 28 male patients, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.9:1. A posterior approach (transsacrococcygeal transverse incision) was utilized in 105 patients, an anterior approach (transabdominal excision) was utilized in 1 patient, and a combined (posterior plus anterior) approach was utilized in 4 patients. The mean tumor size was 8.72 ± 4.28 cm. More than half of the patients (n=59/110) with presacral tumors were asymptomatic. Twenty-six pathological types were observed in our study, including 97 benign lesions and 13 malignant lesions. The intraoperative complication rate was 42.7% (n=47/110), whereas the postoperative morbidity rate was 3.6% (n=4/110). The length of hospital stay for patients treated with the posterior approach was shorter than that of patients treated with the anterior and combined approaches. After a mean follow-up of 90.13 ± 31.22 months, 11 patients had local presacral tumor recurrence, and 1 patient had distant metastasis, with a combined recurrence rate of 10.9% (n=12/110). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical resection of primary presacral tumors via a transsacrococcygeal transverse incision is feasible and safe, with acceptable oncological therapeutic outcomes and a low postoperative morbidity rate, making it worth popularizing in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9179022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91790222022-06-10 Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision Zhao, Xudong Zhou, Sixin Liu, Na Li, Peiyu Chen, Lin Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility and safety of the surgical resection of presacral tumors via a transsacrococcygeal transverse incision. METHODS: The clinical data and prognoses of patients with presacral tumors who underwent surgery at the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients with presacral tumors were included in this study, including 82 female patients and 28 male patients, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.9:1. A posterior approach (transsacrococcygeal transverse incision) was utilized in 105 patients, an anterior approach (transabdominal excision) was utilized in 1 patient, and a combined (posterior plus anterior) approach was utilized in 4 patients. The mean tumor size was 8.72 ± 4.28 cm. More than half of the patients (n=59/110) with presacral tumors were asymptomatic. Twenty-six pathological types were observed in our study, including 97 benign lesions and 13 malignant lesions. The intraoperative complication rate was 42.7% (n=47/110), whereas the postoperative morbidity rate was 3.6% (n=4/110). The length of hospital stay for patients treated with the posterior approach was shorter than that of patients treated with the anterior and combined approaches. After a mean follow-up of 90.13 ± 31.22 months, 11 patients had local presacral tumor recurrence, and 1 patient had distant metastasis, with a combined recurrence rate of 10.9% (n=12/110). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical resection of primary presacral tumors via a transsacrococcygeal transverse incision is feasible and safe, with acceptable oncological therapeutic outcomes and a low postoperative morbidity rate, making it worth popularizing in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9179022/ /pubmed/35692749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.892027 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhao, Zhou, Liu, Li and Chen https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhao, Xudong
Zhou, Sixin
Liu, Na
Li, Peiyu
Chen, Lin
Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision
title Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision
title_full Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision
title_fullStr Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision
title_full_unstemmed Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision
title_short Is There Another Posterior Approach for Presacral Tumors Besides the Kraske Procedure? — A Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Surgical Resection of Primary Presacral Tumors via Transsacrococcygeal Transverse Incision
title_sort is there another posterior approach for presacral tumors besides the kraske procedure? — a study on the feasibility and safety of surgical resection of primary presacral tumors via transsacrococcygeal transverse incision
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9179022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.892027
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxudong isthereanotherposteriorapproachforpresacraltumorsbesidesthekraskeprocedureastudyonthefeasibilityandsafetyofsurgicalresectionofprimarypresacraltumorsviatranssacrococcygealtransverseincision
AT zhousixin isthereanotherposteriorapproachforpresacraltumorsbesidesthekraskeprocedureastudyonthefeasibilityandsafetyofsurgicalresectionofprimarypresacraltumorsviatranssacrococcygealtransverseincision
AT liuna isthereanotherposteriorapproachforpresacraltumorsbesidesthekraskeprocedureastudyonthefeasibilityandsafetyofsurgicalresectionofprimarypresacraltumorsviatranssacrococcygealtransverseincision
AT lipeiyu isthereanotherposteriorapproachforpresacraltumorsbesidesthekraskeprocedureastudyonthefeasibilityandsafetyofsurgicalresectionofprimarypresacraltumorsviatranssacrococcygealtransverseincision
AT chenlin isthereanotherposteriorapproachforpresacraltumorsbesidesthekraskeprocedureastudyonthefeasibilityandsafetyofsurgicalresectionofprimarypresacraltumorsviatranssacrococcygealtransverseincision