Cargando…

Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper presents methods to pool continuous biomarker measurements from multiple studies to estimate the dose–response curves that allow for the nonlinear association between biomarker values and disease risks in matched/nested case–control studies. The approach can be easily appl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yujie, Gail, Mitchell, Smith-Warner, Stephanie, Ziegler, Regina, Wang, Molin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9179317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112783
_version_ 1784723245621051392
author Wu, Yujie
Gail, Mitchell
Smith-Warner, Stephanie
Ziegler, Regina
Wang, Molin
author_facet Wu, Yujie
Gail, Mitchell
Smith-Warner, Stephanie
Ziegler, Regina
Wang, Molin
author_sort Wu, Yujie
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper presents methods to pool continuous biomarker measurements from multiple studies to estimate the dose–response curves that allow for the nonlinear association between biomarker values and disease risks in matched/nested case–control studies. The approach can be easily applied to pooling projects of cancer studies and user-friendly software for implementing the method can be found on the corresponding author’s website. ABSTRACT: Pooling biomarker data across multiple studies enables researchers to obtain precise estimates of the association between biomarker measurements and disease risks due to increased sample sizes. However, biomarker measurements often vary significantly across different assays and laboratories; therefore, calibration of the local laboratory measurements to a reference laboratory is necessary before pooling data. We propose two methods for estimating the dose–response curves that allow for a nonlinear association between the continuous biomarker measurements and log relative risk in pooling projects of matched/nested case–control studies. Our methods are based on full calibration and internalized calibration methods. The full calibration method uses calibrated biomarker measurements for all subjects, even for people with reference laboratory measurements, while the internalized calibration method uses the reference laboratory measurements when available and otherwise uses the calibrated biomarker measurements. We conducted simulation studies to compare these methods, as well as a naive method, where data are pooled without calibration. Our simulation and theoretical results suggest that, in estimating the dose–response curves for biomarker-disease relationships, the internalized and full calibration methods perform substantially better than the naive method, and the full calibration approach is the preferred method for calibrating biomarker measurements. We apply our methods in a pooling project of nested case–control studies to estimate the association of circulating Vitamin D levels with risk of colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9179317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91793172022-06-10 Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies Wu, Yujie Gail, Mitchell Smith-Warner, Stephanie Ziegler, Regina Wang, Molin Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This paper presents methods to pool continuous biomarker measurements from multiple studies to estimate the dose–response curves that allow for the nonlinear association between biomarker values and disease risks in matched/nested case–control studies. The approach can be easily applied to pooling projects of cancer studies and user-friendly software for implementing the method can be found on the corresponding author’s website. ABSTRACT: Pooling biomarker data across multiple studies enables researchers to obtain precise estimates of the association between biomarker measurements and disease risks due to increased sample sizes. However, biomarker measurements often vary significantly across different assays and laboratories; therefore, calibration of the local laboratory measurements to a reference laboratory is necessary before pooling data. We propose two methods for estimating the dose–response curves that allow for a nonlinear association between the continuous biomarker measurements and log relative risk in pooling projects of matched/nested case–control studies. Our methods are based on full calibration and internalized calibration methods. The full calibration method uses calibrated biomarker measurements for all subjects, even for people with reference laboratory measurements, while the internalized calibration method uses the reference laboratory measurements when available and otherwise uses the calibrated biomarker measurements. We conducted simulation studies to compare these methods, as well as a naive method, where data are pooled without calibration. Our simulation and theoretical results suggest that, in estimating the dose–response curves for biomarker-disease relationships, the internalized and full calibration methods perform substantially better than the naive method, and the full calibration approach is the preferred method for calibrating biomarker measurements. We apply our methods in a pooling project of nested case–control studies to estimate the association of circulating Vitamin D levels with risk of colorectal cancer. MDPI 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9179317/ /pubmed/35681763 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112783 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Yujie
Gail, Mitchell
Smith-Warner, Stephanie
Ziegler, Regina
Wang, Molin
Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies
title Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies
title_full Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies
title_fullStr Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies
title_full_unstemmed Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies
title_short Spline Analysis of Biomarker Data Pooled from Multiple Matched/Nested Case–Control Studies
title_sort spline analysis of biomarker data pooled from multiple matched/nested case–control studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9179317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112783
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyujie splineanalysisofbiomarkerdatapooledfrommultiplematchednestedcasecontrolstudies
AT gailmitchell splineanalysisofbiomarkerdatapooledfrommultiplematchednestedcasecontrolstudies
AT smithwarnerstephanie splineanalysisofbiomarkerdatapooledfrommultiplematchednestedcasecontrolstudies
AT zieglerregina splineanalysisofbiomarkerdatapooledfrommultiplematchednestedcasecontrolstudies
AT wangmolin splineanalysisofbiomarkerdatapooledfrommultiplematchednestedcasecontrolstudies