Cargando…

Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common blood cancer in the elderly, which progresses rapidly and is often fatal. The prognosis for AML remains poor in most older patients: only about 15% of patients over 60 years of age can recover. Our aim is to determine new potential AML...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitkevičienė, Aida, Skliutė, Giedrė, Žučenka, Andrius, Borutinskaitė, Veronika, Navakauskienė, Rūta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9179343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112752
_version_ 1784723252256440320
author Vitkevičienė, Aida
Skliutė, Giedrė
Žučenka, Andrius
Borutinskaitė, Veronika
Navakauskienė, Rūta
author_facet Vitkevičienė, Aida
Skliutė, Giedrė
Žučenka, Andrius
Borutinskaitė, Veronika
Navakauskienė, Rūta
author_sort Vitkevičienė, Aida
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common blood cancer in the elderly, which progresses rapidly and is often fatal. The prognosis for AML remains poor in most older patients: only about 15% of patients over 60 years of age can recover. Our aim is to determine new potential AML clinical treatment prognosis markers. We analyzed certain genes, proteins and the epigenome profile in therapy-resistant and responsive AML patients at diagnosis stage and after clinical treatment. We determined that MYC, WT1, IDH1, CDKN1A, HDAC2, TET1, KAT6A and GATAD2A gene expression changes might characterize refractory AML. Therefore, these genes could have an impact for AML prognosis. ABSTRACT: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease. A significant proportion of AML patients is refractory to clinical treatment or relapses. Our aim is to determine new potential AML clinical treatment prognosis markers. We investigated various cell fate and epigenetic regulation important gene level differences between refractory and responsive AML patient groups at diagnosis stage and after clinical treatment using RT-qPCR. We demonstrated that oncogenic MYC and WT1 and metabolic IDH1 gene expression was significantly higher and cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1A (p21) gene expression was significantly lower in refractory patients’ bone marrow cells compared to treatment responsive patients both at diagnosis and after clinical treatment. Moreover, we determined that, compared to clinical treatment responsive patients, refractory patients possess a significantly higher gene expression of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and epigenetic DNA modulator TET1 and a significantly lower gene expression of lysine acetyltransferase 6A (KAT6A) and nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex component GATAD2A. We suggest that MYC, WT1, IDH1, CDKN1A, HDAC2, TET1, KAT6A and GATAD2A gene expression changes might characterize refractory AML. Thus, they might be useful for AML prognosis. Additionally, we suggest that epigenetic modulation might be beneficial in combination with standard treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9179343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91793432022-06-10 Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia Vitkevičienė, Aida Skliutė, Giedrė Žučenka, Andrius Borutinskaitė, Veronika Navakauskienė, Rūta Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common blood cancer in the elderly, which progresses rapidly and is often fatal. The prognosis for AML remains poor in most older patients: only about 15% of patients over 60 years of age can recover. Our aim is to determine new potential AML clinical treatment prognosis markers. We analyzed certain genes, proteins and the epigenome profile in therapy-resistant and responsive AML patients at diagnosis stage and after clinical treatment. We determined that MYC, WT1, IDH1, CDKN1A, HDAC2, TET1, KAT6A and GATAD2A gene expression changes might characterize refractory AML. Therefore, these genes could have an impact for AML prognosis. ABSTRACT: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease. A significant proportion of AML patients is refractory to clinical treatment or relapses. Our aim is to determine new potential AML clinical treatment prognosis markers. We investigated various cell fate and epigenetic regulation important gene level differences between refractory and responsive AML patient groups at diagnosis stage and after clinical treatment using RT-qPCR. We demonstrated that oncogenic MYC and WT1 and metabolic IDH1 gene expression was significantly higher and cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1A (p21) gene expression was significantly lower in refractory patients’ bone marrow cells compared to treatment responsive patients both at diagnosis and after clinical treatment. Moreover, we determined that, compared to clinical treatment responsive patients, refractory patients possess a significantly higher gene expression of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and epigenetic DNA modulator TET1 and a significantly lower gene expression of lysine acetyltransferase 6A (KAT6A) and nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex component GATAD2A. We suggest that MYC, WT1, IDH1, CDKN1A, HDAC2, TET1, KAT6A and GATAD2A gene expression changes might characterize refractory AML. Thus, they might be useful for AML prognosis. Additionally, we suggest that epigenetic modulation might be beneficial in combination with standard treatment. MDPI 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9179343/ /pubmed/35681732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112752 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vitkevičienė, Aida
Skliutė, Giedrė
Žučenka, Andrius
Borutinskaitė, Veronika
Navakauskienė, Rūta
Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_fullStr Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_short Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_sort potential prognostic markers for relapsed/refractory vs. responsive acute myeloid leukemia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9179343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14112752
work_keys_str_mv AT vitkevicieneaida potentialprognosticmarkersforrelapsedrefractoryvsresponsiveacutemyeloidleukemia
AT skliutegiedre potentialprognosticmarkersforrelapsedrefractoryvsresponsiveacutemyeloidleukemia
AT zucenkaandrius potentialprognosticmarkersforrelapsedrefractoryvsresponsiveacutemyeloidleukemia
AT borutinskaiteveronika potentialprognosticmarkersforrelapsedrefractoryvsresponsiveacutemyeloidleukemia
AT navakauskieneruta potentialprognosticmarkersforrelapsedrefractoryvsresponsiveacutemyeloidleukemia