Cargando…

Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation

Humans are exposed to a myriad of chemicals every day, some of which have been established to have deleterious effects on human health. Regulatory frameworks play a vital role in safeguarding human health through the management of chemicals and their risks. For this review, we focused on agricultura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabriela, Arlene, Leong, Sarah, Ong, Philip S. W., Weinert, Derek, Hlubucek, Joe, Tait, Peter W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116673
_version_ 1784723425417232384
author Gabriela, Arlene
Leong, Sarah
Ong, Philip S. W.
Weinert, Derek
Hlubucek, Joe
Tait, Peter W.
author_facet Gabriela, Arlene
Leong, Sarah
Ong, Philip S. W.
Weinert, Derek
Hlubucek, Joe
Tait, Peter W.
author_sort Gabriela, Arlene
collection PubMed
description Humans are exposed to a myriad of chemicals every day, some of which have been established to have deleterious effects on human health. Regulatory frameworks play a vital role in safeguarding human health through the management of chemicals and their risks. For this review, we focused on agricultural and veterinary (Agvet) chemicals and industrial chemicals, which are regulated, respectively, by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), and the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS). The current frameworks have been considered fragmented, inefficient, and most importantly, unsafe in prioritizing human health. We evaluated these frameworks, identified gaps, and suggested improvements that would help bring chemical regulation in Australia in line with comparative regulations in the EU, US, and Canada. Several weaknesses in the Australian frameworks include the lack of a national program to monitor chemical residues, slow pace in conducting chemical reviews, inconsistent risk management across states and territories, a paucity of research efforts on human health impacts, and inadequate framework assessment systems. Recommendations for Australia include establishing a national surveillance and chemical residue monitoring system, harmonizing risk assessment and management across jurisdictions, improving chemical review efficiency, and developing regular performance review mechanisms to ensure that human health is protected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91800672022-06-10 Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation Gabriela, Arlene Leong, Sarah Ong, Philip S. W. Weinert, Derek Hlubucek, Joe Tait, Peter W. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Humans are exposed to a myriad of chemicals every day, some of which have been established to have deleterious effects on human health. Regulatory frameworks play a vital role in safeguarding human health through the management of chemicals and their risks. For this review, we focused on agricultural and veterinary (Agvet) chemicals and industrial chemicals, which are regulated, respectively, by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), and the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS). The current frameworks have been considered fragmented, inefficient, and most importantly, unsafe in prioritizing human health. We evaluated these frameworks, identified gaps, and suggested improvements that would help bring chemical regulation in Australia in line with comparative regulations in the EU, US, and Canada. Several weaknesses in the Australian frameworks include the lack of a national program to monitor chemical residues, slow pace in conducting chemical reviews, inconsistent risk management across states and territories, a paucity of research efforts on human health impacts, and inadequate framework assessment systems. Recommendations for Australia include establishing a national surveillance and chemical residue monitoring system, harmonizing risk assessment and management across jurisdictions, improving chemical review efficiency, and developing regular performance review mechanisms to ensure that human health is protected. MDPI 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9180067/ /pubmed/35682256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116673 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gabriela, Arlene
Leong, Sarah
Ong, Philip S. W.
Weinert, Derek
Hlubucek, Joe
Tait, Peter W.
Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation
title Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation
title_full Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation
title_fullStr Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation
title_short Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation
title_sort strengthening australia’s chemical regulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116673
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielaarlene strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation
AT leongsarah strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation
AT ongphilipsw strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation
AT weinertderek strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation
AT hlubucekjoe strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation
AT taitpeterw strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation