Cargando…
Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation
Humans are exposed to a myriad of chemicals every day, some of which have been established to have deleterious effects on human health. Regulatory frameworks play a vital role in safeguarding human health through the management of chemicals and their risks. For this review, we focused on agricultura...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116673 |
_version_ | 1784723425417232384 |
---|---|
author | Gabriela, Arlene Leong, Sarah Ong, Philip S. W. Weinert, Derek Hlubucek, Joe Tait, Peter W. |
author_facet | Gabriela, Arlene Leong, Sarah Ong, Philip S. W. Weinert, Derek Hlubucek, Joe Tait, Peter W. |
author_sort | Gabriela, Arlene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans are exposed to a myriad of chemicals every day, some of which have been established to have deleterious effects on human health. Regulatory frameworks play a vital role in safeguarding human health through the management of chemicals and their risks. For this review, we focused on agricultural and veterinary (Agvet) chemicals and industrial chemicals, which are regulated, respectively, by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), and the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS). The current frameworks have been considered fragmented, inefficient, and most importantly, unsafe in prioritizing human health. We evaluated these frameworks, identified gaps, and suggested improvements that would help bring chemical regulation in Australia in line with comparative regulations in the EU, US, and Canada. Several weaknesses in the Australian frameworks include the lack of a national program to monitor chemical residues, slow pace in conducting chemical reviews, inconsistent risk management across states and territories, a paucity of research efforts on human health impacts, and inadequate framework assessment systems. Recommendations for Australia include establishing a national surveillance and chemical residue monitoring system, harmonizing risk assessment and management across jurisdictions, improving chemical review efficiency, and developing regular performance review mechanisms to ensure that human health is protected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9180067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91800672022-06-10 Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation Gabriela, Arlene Leong, Sarah Ong, Philip S. W. Weinert, Derek Hlubucek, Joe Tait, Peter W. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Humans are exposed to a myriad of chemicals every day, some of which have been established to have deleterious effects on human health. Regulatory frameworks play a vital role in safeguarding human health through the management of chemicals and their risks. For this review, we focused on agricultural and veterinary (Agvet) chemicals and industrial chemicals, which are regulated, respectively, by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), and the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS). The current frameworks have been considered fragmented, inefficient, and most importantly, unsafe in prioritizing human health. We evaluated these frameworks, identified gaps, and suggested improvements that would help bring chemical regulation in Australia in line with comparative regulations in the EU, US, and Canada. Several weaknesses in the Australian frameworks include the lack of a national program to monitor chemical residues, slow pace in conducting chemical reviews, inconsistent risk management across states and territories, a paucity of research efforts on human health impacts, and inadequate framework assessment systems. Recommendations for Australia include establishing a national surveillance and chemical residue monitoring system, harmonizing risk assessment and management across jurisdictions, improving chemical review efficiency, and developing regular performance review mechanisms to ensure that human health is protected. MDPI 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9180067/ /pubmed/35682256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116673 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gabriela, Arlene Leong, Sarah Ong, Philip S. W. Weinert, Derek Hlubucek, Joe Tait, Peter W. Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation |
title | Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation |
title_full | Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation |
title_fullStr | Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation |
title_short | Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation |
title_sort | strengthening australia’s chemical regulation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gabrielaarlene strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation AT leongsarah strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation AT ongphilipsw strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation AT weinertderek strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation AT hlubucekjoe strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation AT taitpeterw strengtheningaustraliaschemicalregulation |