Cargando…

Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review

Determining energy requirements is vital for optimizing nutrition interventions in pro-catabolic conditions such as cancer. Gynecological cancer encompasses the most common malignancies in women, yet there is a paucity of research on its metabolic implications. The aim of this review was to explore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pagano, Ana Paula, Ford, Katherine L., Porter Starr, Kathryn N., Kiss, Nicole, Steed, Helen, Kung, Janice Y., Elango, Rajavel, Prado, Carla M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116419
_version_ 1784723440715956224
author Pagano, Ana Paula
Ford, Katherine L.
Porter Starr, Kathryn N.
Kiss, Nicole
Steed, Helen
Kung, Janice Y.
Elango, Rajavel
Prado, Carla M.
author_facet Pagano, Ana Paula
Ford, Katherine L.
Porter Starr, Kathryn N.
Kiss, Nicole
Steed, Helen
Kung, Janice Y.
Elango, Rajavel
Prado, Carla M.
author_sort Pagano, Ana Paula
collection PubMed
description Determining energy requirements is vital for optimizing nutrition interventions in pro-catabolic conditions such as cancer. Gynecological cancer encompasses the most common malignancies in women, yet there is a paucity of research on its metabolic implications. The aim of this review was to explore the literature related to energy metabolism in gynecological cancers. We were particularly interested in exploring the prevalence of energy metabolism abnormalities, methodological approaches used to assess energy metabolism, and clinical implications of inaccurately estimating energy needs. A search strategy was conducted from inception to 27 July 2021. Studies investigating energy metabolism using accurate techniques in adults with any stage of gynecological cancer and the type of treatment were considered. Of the 874 articles screened for eligibility, five studies were included. The definition of energy metabolism abnormalities varied among studies. Considering this limitation, four of the five studies reported hypermetabolism. One of these studies found that hypermetabolism was more prevalent in ovarian compared to cervical cancer. Of the included studies, one reported normometabolism at the group level; individual-level values were not reported. One of the studies reported hypermetabolism pre- and post-treatment, but normometabolism when re-assessed two years post-treatment. No studies explored clinical implications of inaccurately estimating energy needs. Overall, commonly used equations may not accurately predict energy expenditure in gynecological cancers, which can profoundly impact nutritional assessment and intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91801272022-06-10 Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review Pagano, Ana Paula Ford, Katherine L. Porter Starr, Kathryn N. Kiss, Nicole Steed, Helen Kung, Janice Y. Elango, Rajavel Prado, Carla M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Determining energy requirements is vital for optimizing nutrition interventions in pro-catabolic conditions such as cancer. Gynecological cancer encompasses the most common malignancies in women, yet there is a paucity of research on its metabolic implications. The aim of this review was to explore the literature related to energy metabolism in gynecological cancers. We were particularly interested in exploring the prevalence of energy metabolism abnormalities, methodological approaches used to assess energy metabolism, and clinical implications of inaccurately estimating energy needs. A search strategy was conducted from inception to 27 July 2021. Studies investigating energy metabolism using accurate techniques in adults with any stage of gynecological cancer and the type of treatment were considered. Of the 874 articles screened for eligibility, five studies were included. The definition of energy metabolism abnormalities varied among studies. Considering this limitation, four of the five studies reported hypermetabolism. One of these studies found that hypermetabolism was more prevalent in ovarian compared to cervical cancer. Of the included studies, one reported normometabolism at the group level; individual-level values were not reported. One of the studies reported hypermetabolism pre- and post-treatment, but normometabolism when re-assessed two years post-treatment. No studies explored clinical implications of inaccurately estimating energy needs. Overall, commonly used equations may not accurately predict energy expenditure in gynecological cancers, which can profoundly impact nutritional assessment and intervention. MDPI 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9180127/ /pubmed/35682004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116419 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pagano, Ana Paula
Ford, Katherine L.
Porter Starr, Kathryn N.
Kiss, Nicole
Steed, Helen
Kung, Janice Y.
Elango, Rajavel
Prado, Carla M.
Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review
title Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review
title_full Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review
title_short Energy Metabolism in Gynecological Cancers: A Scoping Review
title_sort energy metabolism in gynecological cancers: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116419
work_keys_str_mv AT paganoanapaula energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview
AT fordkatherinel energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview
AT porterstarrkathrynn energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview
AT kissnicole energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview
AT steedhelen energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview
AT kungjanicey energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview
AT elangorajavel energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview
AT pradocarlam energymetabolismingynecologicalcancersascopingreview