Cargando…

The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’

Military fitness testing has historically assessed individual fitness components. Fitness assessments of this nature do not adequately monitor the physical requirements of military operations. The development of a more combat-specific fitness test would enhance accuracy in assessing the soldiers’ re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Daniel, Tayler, Martin, Moore, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116486
_version_ 1784723462698303488
author Moore, Daniel
Tayler, Martin
Moore, Stephen
author_facet Moore, Daniel
Tayler, Martin
Moore, Stephen
author_sort Moore, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Military fitness testing has historically assessed individual fitness components. Fitness assessments of this nature do not adequately monitor the physical requirements of military operations. The development of a more combat-specific fitness test would enhance accuracy in assessing the soldiers’ readiness for the demands of war. This study aimed to assess the short-term reliability of the conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’ (CRA) following a single familiarisation trial with 21 male phase-two British Army Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineer (REME) recruits (age (years) 19.7 ± 2.5) split into two groups (N = 11 and 10) to conform with recruit availability. The CRA was designed to be a multifaceted fitness assessment aimed at replicating the physical demands of a combat situation for military personnel. Methods: Three repeated assessments of the CRA were completed over a 10-day period (trial one as a familiarisation) to assess the short-term reliability of the CRA post familiarisation. The CRA was completed carrying a 4 kg rifle (SA80 A2) and involved a 400 m (M) run wearing an 11 kg backpack (removed after the 400 M) followed by weighted carries, sprints, casualty drags and agility tasks. Completion time (seconds) was recorded to assess performance. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) (2,1) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), the standard error of the measurement (SEM) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for completion time for trials 1-3 (T1-3) and 2-3 (T2-3) to assess reliability post-familiarisation. Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was calculated for T1-2 and T2-3. Descriptive statistics were calculated for completion time for T1-3 and T2-3. Results: The reliability following a familiarisation trial from T1-3 (ICC: 0.75; SEM: 7.1 s; CV: 9.97%) to T2-3 (ICC: 0.88; SEM: 6.4 s; CV: 10.05%) increased. Mean trial time decreased post familiarisation from T1-3 (210.9 ± 21.03 s) to T2-3 (206.3 ± 20.73 s). Conclusions: These findings are inconclusive regarding the short-term reliability of the CRA. The small sample size resulted in wide 95% confidence intervals associated with the ICCs, making the true ICC value hard to determine. The ICCs and MAPE suggest that the reliability of the CRA increased following a familiarisation trial, but this requires further research with a larger cohort to determine with confidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91802152022-06-10 The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’ Moore, Daniel Tayler, Martin Moore, Stephen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Military fitness testing has historically assessed individual fitness components. Fitness assessments of this nature do not adequately monitor the physical requirements of military operations. The development of a more combat-specific fitness test would enhance accuracy in assessing the soldiers’ readiness for the demands of war. This study aimed to assess the short-term reliability of the conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’ (CRA) following a single familiarisation trial with 21 male phase-two British Army Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineer (REME) recruits (age (years) 19.7 ± 2.5) split into two groups (N = 11 and 10) to conform with recruit availability. The CRA was designed to be a multifaceted fitness assessment aimed at replicating the physical demands of a combat situation for military personnel. Methods: Three repeated assessments of the CRA were completed over a 10-day period (trial one as a familiarisation) to assess the short-term reliability of the CRA post familiarisation. The CRA was completed carrying a 4 kg rifle (SA80 A2) and involved a 400 m (M) run wearing an 11 kg backpack (removed after the 400 M) followed by weighted carries, sprints, casualty drags and agility tasks. Completion time (seconds) was recorded to assess performance. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) (2,1) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), the standard error of the measurement (SEM) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for completion time for trials 1-3 (T1-3) and 2-3 (T2-3) to assess reliability post-familiarisation. Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was calculated for T1-2 and T2-3. Descriptive statistics were calculated for completion time for T1-3 and T2-3. Results: The reliability following a familiarisation trial from T1-3 (ICC: 0.75; SEM: 7.1 s; CV: 9.97%) to T2-3 (ICC: 0.88; SEM: 6.4 s; CV: 10.05%) increased. Mean trial time decreased post familiarisation from T1-3 (210.9 ± 21.03 s) to T2-3 (206.3 ± 20.73 s). Conclusions: These findings are inconclusive regarding the short-term reliability of the CRA. The small sample size resulted in wide 95% confidence intervals associated with the ICCs, making the true ICC value hard to determine. The ICCs and MAPE suggest that the reliability of the CRA increased following a familiarisation trial, but this requires further research with a larger cohort to determine with confidence. MDPI 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9180215/ /pubmed/35682070 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116486 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moore, Daniel
Tayler, Martin
Moore, Stephen
The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’
title The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’
title_full The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’
title_fullStr The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’
title_full_unstemmed The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’
title_short The Short-Term Reliability of the Conceptualised ‘Combat Readiness Assessment’
title_sort short-term reliability of the conceptualised ‘combat readiness assessment’
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682070
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116486
work_keys_str_mv AT mooredaniel theshorttermreliabilityoftheconceptualisedcombatreadinessassessment
AT taylermartin theshorttermreliabilityoftheconceptualisedcombatreadinessassessment
AT moorestephen theshorttermreliabilityoftheconceptualisedcombatreadinessassessment
AT mooredaniel shorttermreliabilityoftheconceptualisedcombatreadinessassessment
AT taylermartin shorttermreliabilityoftheconceptualisedcombatreadinessassessment
AT moorestephen shorttermreliabilityoftheconceptualisedcombatreadinessassessment