Cargando…
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation
Over the past two decades, scientists have attempted to evaluate whether the point of maximal fat oxidation (FAT(max)) and the aerobic threshold (AerT) are connected. The existence of such a relationship would allow a more tailored training approach for athletes while improving the efficacy of indiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116479 |
_version_ | 1784723476150484992 |
---|---|
author | Peric, Ratko Nikolovski, Zoran Meucci, Marco Tadger, Philippe Ferri Marini, Carlo Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José |
author_facet | Peric, Ratko Nikolovski, Zoran Meucci, Marco Tadger, Philippe Ferri Marini, Carlo Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José |
author_sort | Peric, Ratko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the past two decades, scientists have attempted to evaluate whether the point of maximal fat oxidation (FAT(max)) and the aerobic threshold (AerT) are connected. The existence of such a relationship would allow a more tailored training approach for athletes while improving the efficacy of individualized exercise prescriptions when treating numerous health-related issues. However, studies have reported conflicting results, and this issue remains unresolved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed: (i) to examine the strength of the association between FAT(max) and AerT by using the effect size (ES) of correlation coefficient (r) and standardized mean difference (SMD); (ii) to identify potential moderators and their influence on ES variability. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021239351) and ClinicalTrials (NCT03789045). PubMed and Google Scholar were searched and fourteen articles, consisting of overall 35 ES for r and 26 ES for SMD were included. Obtained ESs were analyzed using a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis. Our results support the presence of a significant association between FAT(max) and AerT exercise intensities. In conclusion, due to the large ES variance caused by clinical and methodological differences among the studies, we recommend that future studies follow strict standardization of data collection and analysis of FAT(max) and AerT-related outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9180269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91802692022-06-10 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation Peric, Ratko Nikolovski, Zoran Meucci, Marco Tadger, Philippe Ferri Marini, Carlo Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Over the past two decades, scientists have attempted to evaluate whether the point of maximal fat oxidation (FAT(max)) and the aerobic threshold (AerT) are connected. The existence of such a relationship would allow a more tailored training approach for athletes while improving the efficacy of individualized exercise prescriptions when treating numerous health-related issues. However, studies have reported conflicting results, and this issue remains unresolved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed: (i) to examine the strength of the association between FAT(max) and AerT by using the effect size (ES) of correlation coefficient (r) and standardized mean difference (SMD); (ii) to identify potential moderators and their influence on ES variability. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021239351) and ClinicalTrials (NCT03789045). PubMed and Google Scholar were searched and fourteen articles, consisting of overall 35 ES for r and 26 ES for SMD were included. Obtained ESs were analyzed using a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis. Our results support the presence of a significant association between FAT(max) and AerT exercise intensities. In conclusion, due to the large ES variance caused by clinical and methodological differences among the studies, we recommend that future studies follow strict standardization of data collection and analysis of FAT(max) and AerT-related outcomes. MDPI 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9180269/ /pubmed/35682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116479 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Peric, Ratko Nikolovski, Zoran Meucci, Marco Tadger, Philippe Ferri Marini, Carlo Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation |
title | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation |
title_full | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation |
title_short | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis on the association and differences between aerobic threshold and point of optimal fat oxidation |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pericratko asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT nikolovskizoran asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT meuccimarco asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT tadgerphilippe asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT ferrimarinicarlo asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT amarogahetefranciscojose asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT pericratko systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT nikolovskizoran systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT meuccimarco systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT tadgerphilippe systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT ferrimarinicarlo systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation AT amarogahetefranciscojose systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation |