Cargando…

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation

Over the past two decades, scientists have attempted to evaluate whether the point of maximal fat oxidation (FAT(max)) and the aerobic threshold (AerT) are connected. The existence of such a relationship would allow a more tailored training approach for athletes while improving the efficacy of indiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peric, Ratko, Nikolovski, Zoran, Meucci, Marco, Tadger, Philippe, Ferri Marini, Carlo, Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116479
_version_ 1784723476150484992
author Peric, Ratko
Nikolovski, Zoran
Meucci, Marco
Tadger, Philippe
Ferri Marini, Carlo
Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José
author_facet Peric, Ratko
Nikolovski, Zoran
Meucci, Marco
Tadger, Philippe
Ferri Marini, Carlo
Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José
author_sort Peric, Ratko
collection PubMed
description Over the past two decades, scientists have attempted to evaluate whether the point of maximal fat oxidation (FAT(max)) and the aerobic threshold (AerT) are connected. The existence of such a relationship would allow a more tailored training approach for athletes while improving the efficacy of individualized exercise prescriptions when treating numerous health-related issues. However, studies have reported conflicting results, and this issue remains unresolved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed: (i) to examine the strength of the association between FAT(max) and AerT by using the effect size (ES) of correlation coefficient (r) and standardized mean difference (SMD); (ii) to identify potential moderators and their influence on ES variability. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021239351) and ClinicalTrials (NCT03789045). PubMed and Google Scholar were searched and fourteen articles, consisting of overall 35 ES for r and 26 ES for SMD were included. Obtained ESs were analyzed using a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis. Our results support the presence of a significant association between FAT(max) and AerT exercise intensities. In conclusion, due to the large ES variance caused by clinical and methodological differences among the studies, we recommend that future studies follow strict standardization of data collection and analysis of FAT(max) and AerT-related outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91802692022-06-10 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation Peric, Ratko Nikolovski, Zoran Meucci, Marco Tadger, Philippe Ferri Marini, Carlo Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Over the past two decades, scientists have attempted to evaluate whether the point of maximal fat oxidation (FAT(max)) and the aerobic threshold (AerT) are connected. The existence of such a relationship would allow a more tailored training approach for athletes while improving the efficacy of individualized exercise prescriptions when treating numerous health-related issues. However, studies have reported conflicting results, and this issue remains unresolved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed: (i) to examine the strength of the association between FAT(max) and AerT by using the effect size (ES) of correlation coefficient (r) and standardized mean difference (SMD); (ii) to identify potential moderators and their influence on ES variability. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021239351) and ClinicalTrials (NCT03789045). PubMed and Google Scholar were searched and fourteen articles, consisting of overall 35 ES for r and 26 ES for SMD were included. Obtained ESs were analyzed using a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis. Our results support the presence of a significant association between FAT(max) and AerT exercise intensities. In conclusion, due to the large ES variance caused by clinical and methodological differences among the studies, we recommend that future studies follow strict standardization of data collection and analysis of FAT(max) and AerT-related outcomes. MDPI 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9180269/ /pubmed/35682065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116479 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Peric, Ratko
Nikolovski, Zoran
Meucci, Marco
Tadger, Philippe
Ferri Marini, Carlo
Amaro-Gahete, Francisco José
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis on the association and differences between aerobic threshold and point of optimal fat oxidation
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116479
work_keys_str_mv AT pericratko asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT nikolovskizoran asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT meuccimarco asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT tadgerphilippe asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT ferrimarinicarlo asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT amarogahetefranciscojose asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT pericratko systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT nikolovskizoran systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT meuccimarco systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT tadgerphilippe systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT ferrimarinicarlo systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation
AT amarogahetefranciscojose systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheassociationanddifferencesbetweenaerobicthresholdandpointofoptimalfatoxidation