Cargando…

Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes

The authors aimed to explore the association between visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability (BPV) in pregnant women and adverse neonatal outcomes. The study included 52 891 pregnant women. BPV was calculated as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic blood pressure (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Yingjie, Shi, Haofan, Zeng, Weijian, Zheng, Yulong, Yang, Mengnan, Sun, Mengru, Shi, Hong, Gu, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35567772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14500
_version_ 1784723491832987648
author Gu, Yingjie
Shi, Haofan
Zeng, Weijian
Zheng, Yulong
Yang, Mengnan
Sun, Mengru
Shi, Hong
Gu, Wei
author_facet Gu, Yingjie
Shi, Haofan
Zeng, Weijian
Zheng, Yulong
Yang, Mengnan
Sun, Mengru
Shi, Hong
Gu, Wei
author_sort Gu, Yingjie
collection PubMed
description The authors aimed to explore the association between visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability (BPV) in pregnant women and adverse neonatal outcomes. The study included 52 891 pregnant women. BPV was calculated as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP). All participants were divided into four groups by the quartiles of BPV. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP SD in all participants, the fully adjusted ORs were 1.19 (95% CI 1.11–1.27, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.32 (95% CI 1.14–1.54, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.32 (95% CI 1.06–1.63, p for trend = .003) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP CV, ORs were 1.22 (95% CI 1.14–1.30, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.38 (95% CI 1.17–1.61, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.43 (95% CI 1.14–1.79, p for trend < .001) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. ORs for preterm birth and 5‐min Apgar score ≤ 7 were not statistically significant. However, in participants with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, ORs for preterm birth were 2.80 (95% CI 1.99–3.94, p for trend < .001) in DBP SD and 3.25 (95% CI 2.24–4.72, p for trend < .001) in DBP CV when extreme quartiles were compared. In conclusion, higher visit‐to‐visit BPV was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91803302022-06-13 Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes Gu, Yingjie Shi, Haofan Zeng, Weijian Zheng, Yulong Yang, Mengnan Sun, Mengru Shi, Hong Gu, Wei J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Pregnancy The authors aimed to explore the association between visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability (BPV) in pregnant women and adverse neonatal outcomes. The study included 52 891 pregnant women. BPV was calculated as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP). All participants were divided into four groups by the quartiles of BPV. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP SD in all participants, the fully adjusted ORs were 1.19 (95% CI 1.11–1.27, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.32 (95% CI 1.14–1.54, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.32 (95% CI 1.06–1.63, p for trend = .003) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP CV, ORs were 1.22 (95% CI 1.14–1.30, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.38 (95% CI 1.17–1.61, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.43 (95% CI 1.14–1.79, p for trend < .001) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. ORs for preterm birth and 5‐min Apgar score ≤ 7 were not statistically significant. However, in participants with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, ORs for preterm birth were 2.80 (95% CI 1.99–3.94, p for trend < .001) in DBP SD and 3.25 (95% CI 2.24–4.72, p for trend < .001) in DBP CV when extreme quartiles were compared. In conclusion, higher visit‐to‐visit BPV was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9180330/ /pubmed/35567772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14500 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Pregnancy
Gu, Yingjie
Shi, Haofan
Zeng, Weijian
Zheng, Yulong
Yang, Mengnan
Sun, Mengru
Shi, Hong
Gu, Wei
Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
title Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
title_full Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
title_fullStr Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
title_short Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
title_sort association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
topic Pregnancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35567772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14500
work_keys_str_mv AT guyingjie associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes
AT shihaofan associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes
AT zengweijian associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes
AT zhengyulong associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes
AT yangmengnan associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes
AT sunmengru associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes
AT shihong associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes
AT guwei associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes