Cargando…
Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes
The authors aimed to explore the association between visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability (BPV) in pregnant women and adverse neonatal outcomes. The study included 52 891 pregnant women. BPV was calculated as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic blood pressure (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35567772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14500 |
_version_ | 1784723491832987648 |
---|---|
author | Gu, Yingjie Shi, Haofan Zeng, Weijian Zheng, Yulong Yang, Mengnan Sun, Mengru Shi, Hong Gu, Wei |
author_facet | Gu, Yingjie Shi, Haofan Zeng, Weijian Zheng, Yulong Yang, Mengnan Sun, Mengru Shi, Hong Gu, Wei |
author_sort | Gu, Yingjie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The authors aimed to explore the association between visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability (BPV) in pregnant women and adverse neonatal outcomes. The study included 52 891 pregnant women. BPV was calculated as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP). All participants were divided into four groups by the quartiles of BPV. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP SD in all participants, the fully adjusted ORs were 1.19 (95% CI 1.11–1.27, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.32 (95% CI 1.14–1.54, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.32 (95% CI 1.06–1.63, p for trend = .003) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP CV, ORs were 1.22 (95% CI 1.14–1.30, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.38 (95% CI 1.17–1.61, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.43 (95% CI 1.14–1.79, p for trend < .001) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. ORs for preterm birth and 5‐min Apgar score ≤ 7 were not statistically significant. However, in participants with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, ORs for preterm birth were 2.80 (95% CI 1.99–3.94, p for trend < .001) in DBP SD and 3.25 (95% CI 2.24–4.72, p for trend < .001) in DBP CV when extreme quartiles were compared. In conclusion, higher visit‐to‐visit BPV was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9180330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91803302022-06-13 Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes Gu, Yingjie Shi, Haofan Zeng, Weijian Zheng, Yulong Yang, Mengnan Sun, Mengru Shi, Hong Gu, Wei J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Pregnancy The authors aimed to explore the association between visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability (BPV) in pregnant women and adverse neonatal outcomes. The study included 52 891 pregnant women. BPV was calculated as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP). All participants were divided into four groups by the quartiles of BPV. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP SD in all participants, the fully adjusted ORs were 1.19 (95% CI 1.11–1.27, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.32 (95% CI 1.14–1.54, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.32 (95% CI 1.06–1.63, p for trend = .003) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. When comparing the highest quartiles to the lowest quartiles of DBP CV, ORs were 1.22 (95% CI 1.14–1.30, p for trend < .001) for fetal distress, 1.38 (95% CI 1.17–1.61, p for trend < .001) for small for gestational age, 1.43 (95% CI 1.14–1.79, p for trend < .001) for 1‐min Apgar score ≤ 7. ORs for preterm birth and 5‐min Apgar score ≤ 7 were not statistically significant. However, in participants with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, ORs for preterm birth were 2.80 (95% CI 1.99–3.94, p for trend < .001) in DBP SD and 3.25 (95% CI 2.24–4.72, p for trend < .001) in DBP CV when extreme quartiles were compared. In conclusion, higher visit‐to‐visit BPV was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9180330/ /pubmed/35567772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14500 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Pregnancy Gu, Yingjie Shi, Haofan Zeng, Weijian Zheng, Yulong Yang, Mengnan Sun, Mengru Shi, Hong Gu, Wei Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes |
title | Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes |
title_full | Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes |
title_fullStr | Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes |
title_short | Association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes |
title_sort | association between gestational visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability and adverse neonatal outcomes |
topic | Pregnancy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35567772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guyingjie associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes AT shihaofan associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes AT zengweijian associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes AT zhengyulong associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes AT yangmengnan associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes AT sunmengru associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes AT shihong associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes AT guwei associationbetweengestationalvisittovisitbloodpressurevariabilityandadverseneonataloutcomes |