Cargando…

Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)

Groundwater contamination by potentially harmful elements (PHEs) originating from the weathering of granitic and gneissic rock dissolution poses a public health concern worldwide. This study investigated physicochemical variables and PHEs in the groundwater system and mine water of the Adenzai flood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashid, Abdur, Ayub, Muhammad, Ullah, Zahid, Ali, Asmat, Khattak, Seema Anjum, Ali, Liaqat, Gao, Xubo, Li, Chengcheng, Khan, Sardar, El-Serehy, Hamed A., Kaushik, Prashant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116472
_version_ 1784723635510968320
author Rashid, Abdur
Ayub, Muhammad
Ullah, Zahid
Ali, Asmat
Khattak, Seema Anjum
Ali, Liaqat
Gao, Xubo
Li, Chengcheng
Khan, Sardar
El-Serehy, Hamed A.
Kaushik, Prashant
author_facet Rashid, Abdur
Ayub, Muhammad
Ullah, Zahid
Ali, Asmat
Khattak, Seema Anjum
Ali, Liaqat
Gao, Xubo
Li, Chengcheng
Khan, Sardar
El-Serehy, Hamed A.
Kaushik, Prashant
author_sort Rashid, Abdur
collection PubMed
description Groundwater contamination by potentially harmful elements (PHEs) originating from the weathering of granitic and gneissic rock dissolution poses a public health concern worldwide. This study investigated physicochemical variables and PHEs in the groundwater system and mine water of the Adenzai flood plain region, in Pakistan, emphasizing the fate distribution, source provenance, chemical speciation, and health hazard using the human health risk assessment HHRA-model. The average concentrations of the PHEs, viz., Ni, Mn, Cr, Cu, Cd, Pb, Co, Fe, and Zn 0.23, were 0.27, 0.07, 0.30, 0.07, 0.06, 0.08, 0.68, and 0.23 mg/L, respectively. The average values of chemical species in the groundwater system, viz., H(+), OH(−), Ni(2+), Mn(2+), Mn(3+), Cr(3+), Cr(6+), Cu(+), Cu(2+), Cd(2+), Pb(2+), Pb(4+), Co(2+), Co(3+), Fe(2+), Fe(3+), and Zn(2+), were 1.0 × 10(−4) ± 1.0 × 10(−6), 1.0 × 10(−4) ± 9.0 × 10(−7), 2.0 × 10(−1) ± 1.0 × 10(−3), 3.0 × 10(−1) ± 1.0 × 10(−3), 1.0 × 10(−22) ± 1.0 × 10(−23), 4.0 × 10(−6) ± 2.0 × 10(−6), 4.0 × 10(−11) ± 2.0 × 10(−11), 9.0 × 10(−3) ± 1.0 × 10(−2), 2.0 × 10(−1) ± 2.0 × 10(−3), 7.0 × 10(−2) ± 6.0 × 10(−2), 5.0 × 10(−2) ± 5.0 × 10(−2), 2.0 × 10(−2) ± 1.5 × 10(−2), 6.0 × 10(−2) ± 4.0 × 10(−2), 8.0 × 10(−31) ± 6.0 × 10(−31), 3.0 × 10(−1) ± 2.0 × 10(−4), 4.0 × 10(−10) ± 3.0 × 10(−10), and 2.0 × 10(−1) ± 1.0 × 10(−1). The mineral compositions of PHEs, viz. Ni, were bunsenite, Ni(OH)(2), and trevorite; Mn viz., birnessite, bixbyite, hausmannite, manganite, manganosite, pyrolusite, and todorokite; Cr viz., chromite and eskolaite; Cu viz., CuCr(2)O(4), cuprite, delafossite, ferrite-Cu, and tenorite; Cd viz., monteponite; Pb viz, crocoite, litharge, massicot, minium, plattnerite, Co viz., spinel-Co; Fe viz., goethite, hematite, magnetite, wustite, and ferrite-Zn; and Zn viz., zincite, and ZnCr(2)O(4) demarcated undersaturation and supersaturation. However, EC, Ca(2+), K(+), Na(+), HCO(3)(−), Cr, Cd, Pb, Co, and Fe had exceeded the WHO guideline. The Nemerow’s pollution index (NPI) showed that EC, Ca(2+), K(+), Na(+), HCO(3)(−), Mn, Cd, Pb, Co, and Fe had worse water quality. Principal component analysis multilinear regression (PCAMLR) and cluster analysis (CA) revealed that 75% of the groundwater contamination originated from geogenic inputs and 18% mixed geogenic-anthropogenic and 7% anthropogenic sources. The HHRA-model suggested potential non-carcinogenic risks, except for Fe, and substantial carcinogenic risks for evaluated PHEs. The women and infants are extremely exposed to PHEs hazards. The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks in children, males, and females had exceeded their desired level. The HHRA values of PHEs exhibited the following increasing pattern: Co > Cu > Mn > Zn > Fe, and Cd > Pb > Ni > Cr. The higher THI values of PHEs in children and adults suggested that the groundwater consumption in the entire region is unfit for drinking, domestic, and agricultural purposes. Thus, all groundwater sources need immediate remedial measures to secure health safety and public health concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91809082022-06-10 Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Rashid, Abdur Ayub, Muhammad Ullah, Zahid Ali, Asmat Khattak, Seema Anjum Ali, Liaqat Gao, Xubo Li, Chengcheng Khan, Sardar El-Serehy, Hamed A. Kaushik, Prashant Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Groundwater contamination by potentially harmful elements (PHEs) originating from the weathering of granitic and gneissic rock dissolution poses a public health concern worldwide. This study investigated physicochemical variables and PHEs in the groundwater system and mine water of the Adenzai flood plain region, in Pakistan, emphasizing the fate distribution, source provenance, chemical speciation, and health hazard using the human health risk assessment HHRA-model. The average concentrations of the PHEs, viz., Ni, Mn, Cr, Cu, Cd, Pb, Co, Fe, and Zn 0.23, were 0.27, 0.07, 0.30, 0.07, 0.06, 0.08, 0.68, and 0.23 mg/L, respectively. The average values of chemical species in the groundwater system, viz., H(+), OH(−), Ni(2+), Mn(2+), Mn(3+), Cr(3+), Cr(6+), Cu(+), Cu(2+), Cd(2+), Pb(2+), Pb(4+), Co(2+), Co(3+), Fe(2+), Fe(3+), and Zn(2+), were 1.0 × 10(−4) ± 1.0 × 10(−6), 1.0 × 10(−4) ± 9.0 × 10(−7), 2.0 × 10(−1) ± 1.0 × 10(−3), 3.0 × 10(−1) ± 1.0 × 10(−3), 1.0 × 10(−22) ± 1.0 × 10(−23), 4.0 × 10(−6) ± 2.0 × 10(−6), 4.0 × 10(−11) ± 2.0 × 10(−11), 9.0 × 10(−3) ± 1.0 × 10(−2), 2.0 × 10(−1) ± 2.0 × 10(−3), 7.0 × 10(−2) ± 6.0 × 10(−2), 5.0 × 10(−2) ± 5.0 × 10(−2), 2.0 × 10(−2) ± 1.5 × 10(−2), 6.0 × 10(−2) ± 4.0 × 10(−2), 8.0 × 10(−31) ± 6.0 × 10(−31), 3.0 × 10(−1) ± 2.0 × 10(−4), 4.0 × 10(−10) ± 3.0 × 10(−10), and 2.0 × 10(−1) ± 1.0 × 10(−1). The mineral compositions of PHEs, viz. Ni, were bunsenite, Ni(OH)(2), and trevorite; Mn viz., birnessite, bixbyite, hausmannite, manganite, manganosite, pyrolusite, and todorokite; Cr viz., chromite and eskolaite; Cu viz., CuCr(2)O(4), cuprite, delafossite, ferrite-Cu, and tenorite; Cd viz., monteponite; Pb viz, crocoite, litharge, massicot, minium, plattnerite, Co viz., spinel-Co; Fe viz., goethite, hematite, magnetite, wustite, and ferrite-Zn; and Zn viz., zincite, and ZnCr(2)O(4) demarcated undersaturation and supersaturation. However, EC, Ca(2+), K(+), Na(+), HCO(3)(−), Cr, Cd, Pb, Co, and Fe had exceeded the WHO guideline. The Nemerow’s pollution index (NPI) showed that EC, Ca(2+), K(+), Na(+), HCO(3)(−), Mn, Cd, Pb, Co, and Fe had worse water quality. Principal component analysis multilinear regression (PCAMLR) and cluster analysis (CA) revealed that 75% of the groundwater contamination originated from geogenic inputs and 18% mixed geogenic-anthropogenic and 7% anthropogenic sources. The HHRA-model suggested potential non-carcinogenic risks, except for Fe, and substantial carcinogenic risks for evaluated PHEs. The women and infants are extremely exposed to PHEs hazards. The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks in children, males, and females had exceeded their desired level. The HHRA values of PHEs exhibited the following increasing pattern: Co > Cu > Mn > Zn > Fe, and Cd > Pb > Ni > Cr. The higher THI values of PHEs in children and adults suggested that the groundwater consumption in the entire region is unfit for drinking, domestic, and agricultural purposes. Thus, all groundwater sources need immediate remedial measures to secure health safety and public health concerns. MDPI 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9180908/ /pubmed/35682055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116472 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rashid, Abdur
Ayub, Muhammad
Ullah, Zahid
Ali, Asmat
Khattak, Seema Anjum
Ali, Liaqat
Gao, Xubo
Li, Chengcheng
Khan, Sardar
El-Serehy, Hamed A.
Kaushik, Prashant
Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)
title Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)
title_full Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)
title_fullStr Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)
title_full_unstemmed Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)
title_short Geochemical Modeling Source Provenance, Public Health Exposure, and Evaluating Potentially Harmful Elements in Groundwater: Statistical and Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA)
title_sort geochemical modeling source provenance, public health exposure, and evaluating potentially harmful elements in groundwater: statistical and human health risk assessment (hhra)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116472
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidabdur geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT ayubmuhammad geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT ullahzahid geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT aliasmat geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT khattakseemaanjum geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT aliliaqat geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT gaoxubo geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT lichengcheng geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT khansardar geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT elserehyhameda geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra
AT kaushikprashant geochemicalmodelingsourceprovenancepublichealthexposureandevaluatingpotentiallyharmfulelementsingroundwaterstatisticalandhumanhealthriskassessmenthhra