Cargando…

When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite prompt revascularization, in particular, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and therapeutic and te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masiero, Giulia, Cardaioli, Francesco, Rodinò, Giulio, Tarantini, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113116
_version_ 1784723645438885888
author Masiero, Giulia
Cardaioli, Francesco
Rodinò, Giulio
Tarantini, Giuseppe
author_facet Masiero, Giulia
Cardaioli, Francesco
Rodinò, Giulio
Tarantini, Giuseppe
author_sort Masiero, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite prompt revascularization, in particular, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and therapeutic and technological advances, the mortality rate for patients with CS related to AMI remains unacceptably high. Differently form a hemodynamically stable setting, a culprit lesion-only (CLO) revascularization strategy is currently suggested for AMI–CS patients, based on the results of recent randomized evidence burdened by several limitations and conflicting results from non-randomized studies. Furthermore, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have emerged as a key therapeutic option in CS, especially in the case of their early implantation without delaying revascularization and before irreversible organ damage has occurred. We provide an in-depth review of the current evidence on optimal revascularization strategies of multivessel CAD in infarct-related CS, assessing the role of different types of MCS devices and highlighting the importance of shock teams and medical care system networks to effectively impact on clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91809472022-06-10 When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Masiero, Giulia Cardaioli, Francesco Rodinò, Giulio Tarantini, Giuseppe J Clin Med Review Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite prompt revascularization, in particular, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and therapeutic and technological advances, the mortality rate for patients with CS related to AMI remains unacceptably high. Differently form a hemodynamically stable setting, a culprit lesion-only (CLO) revascularization strategy is currently suggested for AMI–CS patients, based on the results of recent randomized evidence burdened by several limitations and conflicting results from non-randomized studies. Furthermore, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have emerged as a key therapeutic option in CS, especially in the case of their early implantation without delaying revascularization and before irreversible organ damage has occurred. We provide an in-depth review of the current evidence on optimal revascularization strategies of multivessel CAD in infarct-related CS, assessing the role of different types of MCS devices and highlighting the importance of shock teams and medical care system networks to effectively impact on clinical outcomes. MDPI 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9180947/ /pubmed/35683500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113116 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Masiero, Giulia
Cardaioli, Francesco
Rodinò, Giulio
Tarantini, Giuseppe
When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
title When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
title_full When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
title_fullStr When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
title_full_unstemmed When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
title_short When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
title_sort when to achieve complete revascularization in infarct-related cardiogenic shock
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113116
work_keys_str_mv AT masierogiulia whentoachievecompleterevascularizationininfarctrelatedcardiogenicshock
AT cardaiolifrancesco whentoachievecompleterevascularizationininfarctrelatedcardiogenicshock
AT rodinogiulio whentoachievecompleterevascularizationininfarctrelatedcardiogenicshock
AT tarantinigiuseppe whentoachievecompleterevascularizationininfarctrelatedcardiogenicshock