Cargando…

Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?

A retrospective case control study was undertaken at the molecular biology department of a private center for reproductive medicine in order to determine whether any correlation exists between the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content of trophectoderm and embryo developmental potential. A total of 275 c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukaszuk, Krzysztof, Podolak, Amira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115976
_version_ 1784723649699250176
author Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
Podolak, Amira
author_facet Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
Podolak, Amira
author_sort Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description A retrospective case control study was undertaken at the molecular biology department of a private center for reproductive medicine in order to determine whether any correlation exists between the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content of trophectoderm and embryo developmental potential. A total of 275 couples underwent IVF treatment, producing a total of 716 embryos. The trophectoderm was biopsied from each embryo at the blastocyst stage (day 5 or day 6 post-fertilization) subjected to low-pass next-generation sequencing (NGS), for the purpose of detecting aneuploidy. For each sample, the number of mtDNA reads obtained after analysis using NGS was divided by the number of reads attributable to the nuclear genome. The mtDNA copy number was found to be higher in aneuploid embryos than in those that were euploid (mean mtDNA ratio ± SD: 1.13 ± 1.37 versus 1.45 ± 1.78, p = 0.02) and in day 5 biopsies compared to day 6 biopsies (1.41 ± 1.66 vs. 1.19 ± 1.27, p = 0.001), whereas no statistically significant differences in mtDNA content were seen in relation to embryo morphology (1.58 ± 2.44 vs. 2.19 ± 2.89, p = 0.12), genetic sex (1.27 ± 1.29 vs. 1.27 ± 1.18, p = 0.99), maternal age (1.31 ± 1.41 vs. 1.33 ± 1.29, p = 0.43), or its ability to implant (1.14 ± 0.88 vs. 1.21 ± 1.16, p = 0.39). mtDNA has small potential to serve as an additional, independent biomarker for embryo selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91809632022-06-10 Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? Lukaszuk, Krzysztof Podolak, Amira Int J Mol Sci Article A retrospective case control study was undertaken at the molecular biology department of a private center for reproductive medicine in order to determine whether any correlation exists between the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content of trophectoderm and embryo developmental potential. A total of 275 couples underwent IVF treatment, producing a total of 716 embryos. The trophectoderm was biopsied from each embryo at the blastocyst stage (day 5 or day 6 post-fertilization) subjected to low-pass next-generation sequencing (NGS), for the purpose of detecting aneuploidy. For each sample, the number of mtDNA reads obtained after analysis using NGS was divided by the number of reads attributable to the nuclear genome. The mtDNA copy number was found to be higher in aneuploid embryos than in those that were euploid (mean mtDNA ratio ± SD: 1.13 ± 1.37 versus 1.45 ± 1.78, p = 0.02) and in day 5 biopsies compared to day 6 biopsies (1.41 ± 1.66 vs. 1.19 ± 1.27, p = 0.001), whereas no statistically significant differences in mtDNA content were seen in relation to embryo morphology (1.58 ± 2.44 vs. 2.19 ± 2.89, p = 0.12), genetic sex (1.27 ± 1.29 vs. 1.27 ± 1.18, p = 0.99), maternal age (1.31 ± 1.41 vs. 1.33 ± 1.29, p = 0.43), or its ability to implant (1.14 ± 0.88 vs. 1.21 ± 1.16, p = 0.39). mtDNA has small potential to serve as an additional, independent biomarker for embryo selection. MDPI 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9180963/ /pubmed/35682656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115976 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
Podolak, Amira
Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?
title Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?
title_full Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?
title_fullStr Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?
title_full_unstemmed Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?
title_short Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?
title_sort does trophectoderm mitochondrial dna content affect embryo developmental and implantation potential?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115976
work_keys_str_mv AT lukaszukkrzysztof doestrophectodermmitochondrialdnacontentaffectembryodevelopmentalandimplantationpotential
AT podolakamira doestrophectodermmitochondrialdnacontentaffectembryodevelopmentalandimplantationpotential