Cargando…
Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential?
A retrospective case control study was undertaken at the molecular biology department of a private center for reproductive medicine in order to determine whether any correlation exists between the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content of trophectoderm and embryo developmental potential. A total of 275 c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115976 |
_version_ | 1784723649699250176 |
---|---|
author | Lukaszuk, Krzysztof Podolak, Amira |
author_facet | Lukaszuk, Krzysztof Podolak, Amira |
author_sort | Lukaszuk, Krzysztof |
collection | PubMed |
description | A retrospective case control study was undertaken at the molecular biology department of a private center for reproductive medicine in order to determine whether any correlation exists between the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content of trophectoderm and embryo developmental potential. A total of 275 couples underwent IVF treatment, producing a total of 716 embryos. The trophectoderm was biopsied from each embryo at the blastocyst stage (day 5 or day 6 post-fertilization) subjected to low-pass next-generation sequencing (NGS), for the purpose of detecting aneuploidy. For each sample, the number of mtDNA reads obtained after analysis using NGS was divided by the number of reads attributable to the nuclear genome. The mtDNA copy number was found to be higher in aneuploid embryos than in those that were euploid (mean mtDNA ratio ± SD: 1.13 ± 1.37 versus 1.45 ± 1.78, p = 0.02) and in day 5 biopsies compared to day 6 biopsies (1.41 ± 1.66 vs. 1.19 ± 1.27, p = 0.001), whereas no statistically significant differences in mtDNA content were seen in relation to embryo morphology (1.58 ± 2.44 vs. 2.19 ± 2.89, p = 0.12), genetic sex (1.27 ± 1.29 vs. 1.27 ± 1.18, p = 0.99), maternal age (1.31 ± 1.41 vs. 1.33 ± 1.29, p = 0.43), or its ability to implant (1.14 ± 0.88 vs. 1.21 ± 1.16, p = 0.39). mtDNA has small potential to serve as an additional, independent biomarker for embryo selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9180963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91809632022-06-10 Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? Lukaszuk, Krzysztof Podolak, Amira Int J Mol Sci Article A retrospective case control study was undertaken at the molecular biology department of a private center for reproductive medicine in order to determine whether any correlation exists between the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content of trophectoderm and embryo developmental potential. A total of 275 couples underwent IVF treatment, producing a total of 716 embryos. The trophectoderm was biopsied from each embryo at the blastocyst stage (day 5 or day 6 post-fertilization) subjected to low-pass next-generation sequencing (NGS), for the purpose of detecting aneuploidy. For each sample, the number of mtDNA reads obtained after analysis using NGS was divided by the number of reads attributable to the nuclear genome. The mtDNA copy number was found to be higher in aneuploid embryos than in those that were euploid (mean mtDNA ratio ± SD: 1.13 ± 1.37 versus 1.45 ± 1.78, p = 0.02) and in day 5 biopsies compared to day 6 biopsies (1.41 ± 1.66 vs. 1.19 ± 1.27, p = 0.001), whereas no statistically significant differences in mtDNA content were seen in relation to embryo morphology (1.58 ± 2.44 vs. 2.19 ± 2.89, p = 0.12), genetic sex (1.27 ± 1.29 vs. 1.27 ± 1.18, p = 0.99), maternal age (1.31 ± 1.41 vs. 1.33 ± 1.29, p = 0.43), or its ability to implant (1.14 ± 0.88 vs. 1.21 ± 1.16, p = 0.39). mtDNA has small potential to serve as an additional, independent biomarker for embryo selection. MDPI 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9180963/ /pubmed/35682656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115976 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lukaszuk, Krzysztof Podolak, Amira Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? |
title | Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? |
title_full | Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? |
title_fullStr | Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? |
title_short | Does Trophectoderm Mitochondrial DNA Content Affect Embryo Developmental and Implantation Potential? |
title_sort | does trophectoderm mitochondrial dna content affect embryo developmental and implantation potential? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35682656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23115976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukaszukkrzysztof doestrophectodermmitochondrialdnacontentaffectembryodevelopmentalandimplantationpotential AT podolakamira doestrophectodermmitochondrialdnacontentaffectembryodevelopmentalandimplantationpotential |