Cargando…

Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists

Poland has never had a widespread diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening program and subsequently has no purpose-trained graders and no established grader training scheme. Herein, we compare the performance and variability of three retinal specialists with no additional DR grading training in assessing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grzybowski, Andrzej, Brona, Piotr, Krzywicki, Tomasz, Gaca-Wysocka, Magdalena, Berlińska, Arleta, Święch, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113125
_version_ 1784723650240315392
author Grzybowski, Andrzej
Brona, Piotr
Krzywicki, Tomasz
Gaca-Wysocka, Magdalena
Berlińska, Arleta
Święch, Anna
author_facet Grzybowski, Andrzej
Brona, Piotr
Krzywicki, Tomasz
Gaca-Wysocka, Magdalena
Berlińska, Arleta
Święch, Anna
author_sort Grzybowski, Andrzej
collection PubMed
description Poland has never had a widespread diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening program and subsequently has no purpose-trained graders and no established grader training scheme. Herein, we compare the performance and variability of three retinal specialists with no additional DR grading training in assessing images from 335 real-life screening encounters and contrast their performance against IDx-DR, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved DR screening suite. A total of 1501 fundus images from 670 eyes were assessed by each grader with a final grade on a per-eye level. Unanimous agreement between all graders was achieved for 385 eyes, and 110 patients, out of which 98% had a final grade of no DR. Thirty-six patients had final grades higher than mild DR, out of which only two had no grader disagreements regarding severity. A total of 28 eyes underwent adjudication due to complete grader disagreement. Four patients had discordant grades ranging from no DR to severe DR between the human graders and IDx-DR. Retina specialists achieved kappa scores of 0.52, 0.78, and 0.61. Retina specialists had relatively high grader variability and only a modest concordance with IDx-DR results. Focused training and verification are recommended for any potential DR graders before assessing DR screening images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9180965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91809652022-06-10 Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists Grzybowski, Andrzej Brona, Piotr Krzywicki, Tomasz Gaca-Wysocka, Magdalena Berlińska, Arleta Święch, Anna J Clin Med Article Poland has never had a widespread diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening program and subsequently has no purpose-trained graders and no established grader training scheme. Herein, we compare the performance and variability of three retinal specialists with no additional DR grading training in assessing images from 335 real-life screening encounters and contrast their performance against IDx-DR, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved DR screening suite. A total of 1501 fundus images from 670 eyes were assessed by each grader with a final grade on a per-eye level. Unanimous agreement between all graders was achieved for 385 eyes, and 110 patients, out of which 98% had a final grade of no DR. Thirty-six patients had final grades higher than mild DR, out of which only two had no grader disagreements regarding severity. A total of 28 eyes underwent adjudication due to complete grader disagreement. Four patients had discordant grades ranging from no DR to severe DR between the human graders and IDx-DR. Retina specialists achieved kappa scores of 0.52, 0.78, and 0.61. Retina specialists had relatively high grader variability and only a modest concordance with IDx-DR results. Focused training and verification are recommended for any potential DR graders before assessing DR screening images. MDPI 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9180965/ /pubmed/35683522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113125 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grzybowski, Andrzej
Brona, Piotr
Krzywicki, Tomasz
Gaca-Wysocka, Magdalena
Berlińska, Arleta
Święch, Anna
Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists
title Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists
title_full Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists
title_fullStr Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists
title_full_unstemmed Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists
title_short Variability of Grading DR Screening Images among Non-Trained Retina Specialists
title_sort variability of grading dr screening images among non-trained retina specialists
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9180965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113125
work_keys_str_mv AT grzybowskiandrzej variabilityofgradingdrscreeningimagesamongnontrainedretinaspecialists
AT bronapiotr variabilityofgradingdrscreeningimagesamongnontrainedretinaspecialists
AT krzywickitomasz variabilityofgradingdrscreeningimagesamongnontrainedretinaspecialists
AT gacawysockamagdalena variabilityofgradingdrscreeningimagesamongnontrainedretinaspecialists
AT berlinskaarleta variabilityofgradingdrscreeningimagesamongnontrainedretinaspecialists
AT swiechanna variabilityofgradingdrscreeningimagesamongnontrainedretinaspecialists