Cargando…

Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?

In this paper, the finite element method was used to simulate the response of the scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) across an iron–zinc cut-edge sample in order to provide a deeper understanding of the localized corrosion rates measured using SVET. It was found that, if the diffusion lay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeedikhani, Mohsen, Vafakhah, Sareh, Blackwood, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15113764
_version_ 1784723762421170176
author Saeedikhani, Mohsen
Vafakhah, Sareh
Blackwood, Daniel J.
author_facet Saeedikhani, Mohsen
Vafakhah, Sareh
Blackwood, Daniel J.
author_sort Saeedikhani, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description In this paper, the finite element method was used to simulate the response of the scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) across an iron–zinc cut-edge sample in order to provide a deeper understanding of the localized corrosion rates measured using SVET. It was found that, if the diffusion layer was neglected, the simulated current density using the Laplace equation fitted the experimental SVET current density perfectly. However, the electrolyte was not perturbed by a vibrating SVET probe in the field, so a diffusion layer existed. Therefore, the SVET current densities obtained from the local conductivity of the electrolyte would likely be more representative of the true corrosion rates than the SVET current densities obtained from the bulk conductivity. To help overcome this difference between natural conditions and those imposed by the SVET experiment, a local electrolyte corrected conductivity SVET (LECC-SVET) current density was introduced, which was obtained by replacing the bulk electrolyte conductivity measured experimentally by the local electrolyte conductivity simulated using the Nernst−Einstein equation. Although the LECC-SVET current density did not fit the experimental SVET current density as perfectly as that obtained from the Laplace equation, it likely represents current densities closer to the true, unperturbed corrosion conditions than the SVET data from the bulk conductivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9181402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91814022022-06-10 Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates? Saeedikhani, Mohsen Vafakhah, Sareh Blackwood, Daniel J. Materials (Basel) Article In this paper, the finite element method was used to simulate the response of the scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) across an iron–zinc cut-edge sample in order to provide a deeper understanding of the localized corrosion rates measured using SVET. It was found that, if the diffusion layer was neglected, the simulated current density using the Laplace equation fitted the experimental SVET current density perfectly. However, the electrolyte was not perturbed by a vibrating SVET probe in the field, so a diffusion layer existed. Therefore, the SVET current densities obtained from the local conductivity of the electrolyte would likely be more representative of the true corrosion rates than the SVET current densities obtained from the bulk conductivity. To help overcome this difference between natural conditions and those imposed by the SVET experiment, a local electrolyte corrected conductivity SVET (LECC-SVET) current density was introduced, which was obtained by replacing the bulk electrolyte conductivity measured experimentally by the local electrolyte conductivity simulated using the Nernst−Einstein equation. Although the LECC-SVET current density did not fit the experimental SVET current density as perfectly as that obtained from the Laplace equation, it likely represents current densities closer to the true, unperturbed corrosion conditions than the SVET data from the bulk conductivity. MDPI 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9181402/ /pubmed/35683063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15113764 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saeedikhani, Mohsen
Vafakhah, Sareh
Blackwood, Daniel J.
Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?
title Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?
title_full Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?
title_fullStr Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?
title_full_unstemmed Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?
title_short Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?
title_sort can finite element method obtain svet current densities closer to true localized corrosion rates?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15113764
work_keys_str_mv AT saeedikhanimohsen canfiniteelementmethodobtainsvetcurrentdensitiesclosertotruelocalizedcorrosionrates
AT vafakhahsareh canfiniteelementmethodobtainsvetcurrentdensitiesclosertotruelocalizedcorrosionrates
AT blackwooddanielj canfiniteelementmethodobtainsvetcurrentdensitiesclosertotruelocalizedcorrosionrates