Cargando…

Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion

Background: Acromial Levy III fractures after inverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in up to 7% of patients. To date, it is not clear how these fractures should be treated as clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of three different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollensteiner, Marianne, Sandriesser, Sabrina, Rittenschober, Felix, Hochreiter, Josef, Augat, Peter, Ernstbrunner, Lukas, Ortmaier, Reinhold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113130
_version_ 1784723807422906368
author Hollensteiner, Marianne
Sandriesser, Sabrina
Rittenschober, Felix
Hochreiter, Josef
Augat, Peter
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Ortmaier, Reinhold
author_facet Hollensteiner, Marianne
Sandriesser, Sabrina
Rittenschober, Felix
Hochreiter, Josef
Augat, Peter
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Ortmaier, Reinhold
author_sort Hollensteiner, Marianne
collection PubMed
description Background: Acromial Levy III fractures after inverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in up to 7% of patients. To date, it is not clear how these fractures should be treated as clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of three different plating methods of type III acromion fractures. Methods: Levy III fractures in synthetic scapulae were fixed with three different methods. Angular stable locking plates were placed on the spina scapula to bridge the fracture either dorsally, caudally, or on both aspects by double plating. In a biomechanical experiment, the pull of the deltoid muscle at 40° abduction of the arm was simulated by cyclic loading with increasing load levels until failure. Failure load, cycles to failure, and fragment motions were evaluated. Results: The results showed that double plating (350 ± 63 N) withstood the highest loads until failure, followed by dorsal (292 ± 20 N) and caudal (217 ± 49 N) plating. Similarly, double plating showed significantly smaller fragment movement than the other two groups. Conclusions: Double plating appeared to provide the largest biomechanical stability in type III acromion fracture under arm abduction. Caudal plating in contract resulted in insufficient fracture stability and early failure and can thus not be recommended from a biomechanical point of view.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9181566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91815662022-06-10 Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion Hollensteiner, Marianne Sandriesser, Sabrina Rittenschober, Felix Hochreiter, Josef Augat, Peter Ernstbrunner, Lukas Ortmaier, Reinhold J Clin Med Article Background: Acromial Levy III fractures after inverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in up to 7% of patients. To date, it is not clear how these fractures should be treated as clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of three different plating methods of type III acromion fractures. Methods: Levy III fractures in synthetic scapulae were fixed with three different methods. Angular stable locking plates were placed on the spina scapula to bridge the fracture either dorsally, caudally, or on both aspects by double plating. In a biomechanical experiment, the pull of the deltoid muscle at 40° abduction of the arm was simulated by cyclic loading with increasing load levels until failure. Failure load, cycles to failure, and fragment motions were evaluated. Results: The results showed that double plating (350 ± 63 N) withstood the highest loads until failure, followed by dorsal (292 ± 20 N) and caudal (217 ± 49 N) plating. Similarly, double plating showed significantly smaller fragment movement than the other two groups. Conclusions: Double plating appeared to provide the largest biomechanical stability in type III acromion fracture under arm abduction. Caudal plating in contract resulted in insufficient fracture stability and early failure and can thus not be recommended from a biomechanical point of view. MDPI 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9181566/ /pubmed/35683515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113130 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hollensteiner, Marianne
Sandriesser, Sabrina
Rittenschober, Felix
Hochreiter, Josef
Augat, Peter
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Ortmaier, Reinhold
Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion
title Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion
title_full Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion
title_fullStr Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion
title_full_unstemmed Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion
title_short Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion
title_sort single or double plating for acromial type iii fractures: biomechanical comparison of load to failure and fragment motion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113130
work_keys_str_mv AT hollensteinermarianne singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion
AT sandriessersabrina singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion
AT rittenschoberfelix singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion
AT hochreiterjosef singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion
AT augatpeter singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion
AT ernstbrunnerlukas singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion
AT ortmaierreinhold singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion