Cargando…
Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion
Background: Acromial Levy III fractures after inverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in up to 7% of patients. To date, it is not clear how these fractures should be treated as clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of three different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113130 |
_version_ | 1784723807422906368 |
---|---|
author | Hollensteiner, Marianne Sandriesser, Sabrina Rittenschober, Felix Hochreiter, Josef Augat, Peter Ernstbrunner, Lukas Ortmaier, Reinhold |
author_facet | Hollensteiner, Marianne Sandriesser, Sabrina Rittenschober, Felix Hochreiter, Josef Augat, Peter Ernstbrunner, Lukas Ortmaier, Reinhold |
author_sort | Hollensteiner, Marianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Acromial Levy III fractures after inverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in up to 7% of patients. To date, it is not clear how these fractures should be treated as clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of three different plating methods of type III acromion fractures. Methods: Levy III fractures in synthetic scapulae were fixed with three different methods. Angular stable locking plates were placed on the spina scapula to bridge the fracture either dorsally, caudally, or on both aspects by double plating. In a biomechanical experiment, the pull of the deltoid muscle at 40° abduction of the arm was simulated by cyclic loading with increasing load levels until failure. Failure load, cycles to failure, and fragment motions were evaluated. Results: The results showed that double plating (350 ± 63 N) withstood the highest loads until failure, followed by dorsal (292 ± 20 N) and caudal (217 ± 49 N) plating. Similarly, double plating showed significantly smaller fragment movement than the other two groups. Conclusions: Double plating appeared to provide the largest biomechanical stability in type III acromion fracture under arm abduction. Caudal plating in contract resulted in insufficient fracture stability and early failure and can thus not be recommended from a biomechanical point of view. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9181566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91815662022-06-10 Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion Hollensteiner, Marianne Sandriesser, Sabrina Rittenschober, Felix Hochreiter, Josef Augat, Peter Ernstbrunner, Lukas Ortmaier, Reinhold J Clin Med Article Background: Acromial Levy III fractures after inverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in up to 7% of patients. To date, it is not clear how these fractures should be treated as clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of three different plating methods of type III acromion fractures. Methods: Levy III fractures in synthetic scapulae were fixed with three different methods. Angular stable locking plates were placed on the spina scapula to bridge the fracture either dorsally, caudally, or on both aspects by double plating. In a biomechanical experiment, the pull of the deltoid muscle at 40° abduction of the arm was simulated by cyclic loading with increasing load levels until failure. Failure load, cycles to failure, and fragment motions were evaluated. Results: The results showed that double plating (350 ± 63 N) withstood the highest loads until failure, followed by dorsal (292 ± 20 N) and caudal (217 ± 49 N) plating. Similarly, double plating showed significantly smaller fragment movement than the other two groups. Conclusions: Double plating appeared to provide the largest biomechanical stability in type III acromion fracture under arm abduction. Caudal plating in contract resulted in insufficient fracture stability and early failure and can thus not be recommended from a biomechanical point of view. MDPI 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9181566/ /pubmed/35683515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113130 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hollensteiner, Marianne Sandriesser, Sabrina Rittenschober, Felix Hochreiter, Josef Augat, Peter Ernstbrunner, Lukas Ortmaier, Reinhold Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion |
title | Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion |
title_full | Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion |
title_fullStr | Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion |
title_full_unstemmed | Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion |
title_short | Single or Double Plating for Acromial Type III Fractures: Biomechanical Comparison of Load to Failure and Fragment Motion |
title_sort | single or double plating for acromial type iii fractures: biomechanical comparison of load to failure and fragment motion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollensteinermarianne singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion AT sandriessersabrina singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion AT rittenschoberfelix singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion AT hochreiterjosef singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion AT augatpeter singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion AT ernstbrunnerlukas singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion AT ortmaierreinhold singleordoubleplatingforacromialtypeiiifracturesbiomechanicalcomparisonofloadtofailureandfragmentmotion |