Cargando…

Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo

Introduction: The effective induction of angiogenesis is directly related to the success of bone-substitute materials (BSM) for maxillofacial osseous regeneration. Therefore, the addition of pro-angiogenic properties to a commercially available bovine bone-substitute material in combination with hya...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kyyak, Solomiya, Blatt, Sebastian, Wiesmann, Nadine, Smeets, Ralf, Kaemmerer, Peer W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15113839
_version_ 1784723816928247808
author Kyyak, Solomiya
Blatt, Sebastian
Wiesmann, Nadine
Smeets, Ralf
Kaemmerer, Peer W.
author_facet Kyyak, Solomiya
Blatt, Sebastian
Wiesmann, Nadine
Smeets, Ralf
Kaemmerer, Peer W.
author_sort Kyyak, Solomiya
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The effective induction of angiogenesis is directly related to the success of bone-substitute materials (BSM) for maxillofacial osseous regeneration. Therefore, the addition of pro-angiogenic properties to a commercially available bovine bone-substitute material in combination with hyaluronic acid (BSM+) was compared to the same bone-substitute material without hyaluronic acid (BSM) in an in-vivo model. Materials and Methods: BSM+ and BSM were incubated for six days on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of fertilized chicken eggs. Microscopically, the number of vessels and branching points, the vessel area and vessel length were evaluated. Subsequently, the total vessel area and brightness integration were assessed after immunohistochemical staining (H&E, alphaSMA). Results: In the BSM+ group, a significantly higher number of vessels (p < 0.001), branching points (p = 0.001), total vessel area (p < 0.001) as well as vessel length (p = 0.001) were found in comparison to the BSM group without hyaluronic acid. Immunohistochemically, a significantly increased total vessel area (p < 0.001 for H&E, p = 0.037 for alphaSMA) and brightness integration (p = 0.047) for BSM+ in comparison to the native material were seen. Conclusions: The combination of a xenogenic bone-substitute material with hyaluronic acid significantly induced angiogenesis in vivo. This might lead to a faster integration and an improved healing in clinical situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9181602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91816022022-06-10 Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo Kyyak, Solomiya Blatt, Sebastian Wiesmann, Nadine Smeets, Ralf Kaemmerer, Peer W. Materials (Basel) Article Introduction: The effective induction of angiogenesis is directly related to the success of bone-substitute materials (BSM) for maxillofacial osseous regeneration. Therefore, the addition of pro-angiogenic properties to a commercially available bovine bone-substitute material in combination with hyaluronic acid (BSM+) was compared to the same bone-substitute material without hyaluronic acid (BSM) in an in-vivo model. Materials and Methods: BSM+ and BSM were incubated for six days on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of fertilized chicken eggs. Microscopically, the number of vessels and branching points, the vessel area and vessel length were evaluated. Subsequently, the total vessel area and brightness integration were assessed after immunohistochemical staining (H&E, alphaSMA). Results: In the BSM+ group, a significantly higher number of vessels (p < 0.001), branching points (p = 0.001), total vessel area (p < 0.001) as well as vessel length (p = 0.001) were found in comparison to the BSM group without hyaluronic acid. Immunohistochemically, a significantly increased total vessel area (p < 0.001 for H&E, p = 0.037 for alphaSMA) and brightness integration (p = 0.047) for BSM+ in comparison to the native material were seen. Conclusions: The combination of a xenogenic bone-substitute material with hyaluronic acid significantly induced angiogenesis in vivo. This might lead to a faster integration and an improved healing in clinical situations. MDPI 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9181602/ /pubmed/35683136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15113839 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kyyak, Solomiya
Blatt, Sebastian
Wiesmann, Nadine
Smeets, Ralf
Kaemmerer, Peer W.
Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo
title Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo
title_full Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo
title_fullStr Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo
title_full_unstemmed Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo
title_short Hyaluronic Acid with Bone Substitutes Enhance Angiogenesis In Vivo
title_sort hyaluronic acid with bone substitutes enhance angiogenesis in vivo
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15113839
work_keys_str_mv AT kyyaksolomiya hyaluronicacidwithbonesubstitutesenhanceangiogenesisinvivo
AT blattsebastian hyaluronicacidwithbonesubstitutesenhanceangiogenesisinvivo
AT wiesmannnadine hyaluronicacidwithbonesubstitutesenhanceangiogenesisinvivo
AT smeetsralf hyaluronicacidwithbonesubstitutesenhanceangiogenesisinvivo
AT kaemmererpeerw hyaluronicacidwithbonesubstitutesenhanceangiogenesisinvivo