Cargando…

Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure

PURPOSE: To evaluate the construct (convergent and known group) validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC), an older-person-specific quality-of-life measure designed for application in quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. METHODS: Convergent validity was assesse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khadka, J., Ratcliffe, J., Hutchinson, C., Cleland, J., Mulhern, B., Lancsar, E., Milte, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35680733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x
_version_ 1784723897341444096
author Khadka, J.
Ratcliffe, J.
Hutchinson, C.
Cleland, J.
Mulhern, B.
Lancsar, E.
Milte, R.
author_facet Khadka, J.
Ratcliffe, J.
Hutchinson, C.
Cleland, J.
Mulhern, B.
Lancsar, E.
Milte, R.
author_sort Khadka, J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the construct (convergent and known group) validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC), an older-person-specific quality-of-life measure designed for application in quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. METHODS: Convergent validity was assessed by examining relationships with other validated preference-based measures (EQ-5D-5L, ASCOT), quality of aged care experience (QCE-ACC) and life satisfaction (PWI) through an online survey. Known-group validity was assessed by testing the ability to discriminate varying levels of care needs, self-reported health and quality of life. RESULTS: Older people (aged ≥ 65 years) receiving community-aged care (N = 313) responded; 54.6% were female, 41.8% were living alone and 56.8% were receiving higher-level care. The QOL-ACC and its six dimensions were low to moderately and significantly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (correlation co-efficient range, ρ = 0.39–0.56). The QOL-ACC demonstrated moderate and statistically significant correlations with ASCOT (ρ = 0.61), the QCE-ACC (ρ = 0.51) and the PWI (ρ = 0.70). Respondents with poorer self-reported health status, quality of life and/or higher-level care needs demonstrated lower QOL-ACC scores (P < 0.001), providing evidence of known-group validity. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence of the construct validity of the QOL-ACC descriptive system. A preference-weighted value set is currently being developed for the QOL-ACC, which when finalised will be subjected to further validation assessments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9181894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91818942022-06-10 Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure Khadka, J. Ratcliffe, J. Hutchinson, C. Cleland, J. Mulhern, B. Lancsar, E. Milte, R. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the construct (convergent and known group) validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC), an older-person-specific quality-of-life measure designed for application in quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. METHODS: Convergent validity was assessed by examining relationships with other validated preference-based measures (EQ-5D-5L, ASCOT), quality of aged care experience (QCE-ACC) and life satisfaction (PWI) through an online survey. Known-group validity was assessed by testing the ability to discriminate varying levels of care needs, self-reported health and quality of life. RESULTS: Older people (aged ≥ 65 years) receiving community-aged care (N = 313) responded; 54.6% were female, 41.8% were living alone and 56.8% were receiving higher-level care. The QOL-ACC and its six dimensions were low to moderately and significantly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (correlation co-efficient range, ρ = 0.39–0.56). The QOL-ACC demonstrated moderate and statistically significant correlations with ASCOT (ρ = 0.61), the QCE-ACC (ρ = 0.51) and the PWI (ρ = 0.70). Respondents with poorer self-reported health status, quality of life and/or higher-level care needs demonstrated lower QOL-ACC scores (P < 0.001), providing evidence of known-group validity. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence of the construct validity of the QOL-ACC descriptive system. A preference-weighted value set is currently being developed for the QOL-ACC, which when finalised will be subjected to further validation assessments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x. Springer International Publishing 2022-06-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9181894/ /pubmed/35680733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Khadka, J.
Ratcliffe, J.
Hutchinson, C.
Cleland, J.
Mulhern, B.
Lancsar, E.
Milte, R.
Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
title Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
title_full Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
title_fullStr Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
title_short Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
title_sort assessing the construct validity of the quality-of-life-aged care consumers (qol-acc): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35680733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x
work_keys_str_mv AT khadkaj assessingtheconstructvalidityofthequalityoflifeagedcareconsumersqolaccanagedcarespecificqualityoflifemeasure
AT ratcliffej assessingtheconstructvalidityofthequalityoflifeagedcareconsumersqolaccanagedcarespecificqualityoflifemeasure
AT hutchinsonc assessingtheconstructvalidityofthequalityoflifeagedcareconsumersqolaccanagedcarespecificqualityoflifemeasure
AT clelandj assessingtheconstructvalidityofthequalityoflifeagedcareconsumersqolaccanagedcarespecificqualityoflifemeasure
AT mulhernb assessingtheconstructvalidityofthequalityoflifeagedcareconsumersqolaccanagedcarespecificqualityoflifemeasure
AT lancsare assessingtheconstructvalidityofthequalityoflifeagedcareconsumersqolaccanagedcarespecificqualityoflifemeasure
AT milter assessingtheconstructvalidityofthequalityoflifeagedcareconsumersqolaccanagedcarespecificqualityoflifemeasure