Cargando…

Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma

The use of a proper sample processing methodology for maximum proteome coverage and high-quality quantitative data is an important choice to make before initiating a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)-based proteomics study. Popular sample processing workflows for proteomics involve in-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neset, Lasse, Takayidza, Gracious, Berven, Frode S., Hernandez-Valladares, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35684327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113390
_version_ 1784723922055331840
author Neset, Lasse
Takayidza, Gracious
Berven, Frode S.
Hernandez-Valladares, Maria
author_facet Neset, Lasse
Takayidza, Gracious
Berven, Frode S.
Hernandez-Valladares, Maria
author_sort Neset, Lasse
collection PubMed
description The use of a proper sample processing methodology for maximum proteome coverage and high-quality quantitative data is an important choice to make before initiating a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)-based proteomics study. Popular sample processing workflows for proteomics involve in-solution proteome digestion and single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3). We tested them on both HeLa cells and human plasma samples, using lysis buffers containing SDS, or guanidinium hydrochloride. We also studied the effect of using commercially available depletion mini spin columns before SP3, to increase proteome coverage in human plasma samples. Our results show that the SP3 protocol, using either buffer, achieves the highest number of quantified proteins in both the HeLa cells and plasma samples. Moreover, the use of depletion mini spin columns before SP3 results in a two-fold increase of quantified plasma proteins. With additional fractionation, we quantified nearly 1400 proteins, and examined lower-abundance proteins involved in neurodegenerative pathways and mitochondrial metabolism. Therefore, we recommend the use of the SP3 methodology for biological sample processing, including those after depletion of high-abundance plasma proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9181984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91819842022-06-10 Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma Neset, Lasse Takayidza, Gracious Berven, Frode S. Hernandez-Valladares, Maria Molecules Article The use of a proper sample processing methodology for maximum proteome coverage and high-quality quantitative data is an important choice to make before initiating a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)-based proteomics study. Popular sample processing workflows for proteomics involve in-solution proteome digestion and single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3). We tested them on both HeLa cells and human plasma samples, using lysis buffers containing SDS, or guanidinium hydrochloride. We also studied the effect of using commercially available depletion mini spin columns before SP3, to increase proteome coverage in human plasma samples. Our results show that the SP3 protocol, using either buffer, achieves the highest number of quantified proteins in both the HeLa cells and plasma samples. Moreover, the use of depletion mini spin columns before SP3 results in a two-fold increase of quantified plasma proteins. With additional fractionation, we quantified nearly 1400 proteins, and examined lower-abundance proteins involved in neurodegenerative pathways and mitochondrial metabolism. Therefore, we recommend the use of the SP3 methodology for biological sample processing, including those after depletion of high-abundance plasma proteins. MDPI 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9181984/ /pubmed/35684327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113390 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Neset, Lasse
Takayidza, Gracious
Berven, Frode S.
Hernandez-Valladares, Maria
Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma
title Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma
title_full Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma
title_fullStr Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma
title_short Comparing Efficiency of Lysis Buffer Solutions and Sample Preparation Methods for Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Human Cells and Plasma
title_sort comparing efficiency of lysis buffer solutions and sample preparation methods for liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of human cells and plasma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35684327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113390
work_keys_str_mv AT nesetlasse comparingefficiencyoflysisbuffersolutionsandsamplepreparationmethodsforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryanalysisofhumancellsandplasma
AT takayidzagracious comparingefficiencyoflysisbuffersolutionsandsamplepreparationmethodsforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryanalysisofhumancellsandplasma
AT bervenfrodes comparingefficiencyoflysisbuffersolutionsandsamplepreparationmethodsforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryanalysisofhumancellsandplasma
AT hernandezvalladaresmaria comparingefficiencyoflysisbuffersolutionsandsamplepreparationmethodsforliquidchromatographymassspectrometryanalysisofhumancellsandplasma