Cargando…
Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
OBJECTIVE: There is little consistency between commercial grade footwear brands for determining shoe sizing, and no universally accepted descriptors of common types or features of footwear. The primary aim of this research was to develop a footwear taxonomy about the agreed types of footwear commonl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9182301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269223 |
_version_ | 1784724001855111168 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Cylie M. Morrison, Stewart C. Paterson, Kade Gobbi, Katherine Burton, Sam Hill, Matthew Harber, Emma Banwell, Helen |
author_facet | Williams, Cylie M. Morrison, Stewart C. Paterson, Kade Gobbi, Katherine Burton, Sam Hill, Matthew Harber, Emma Banwell, Helen |
author_sort | Williams, Cylie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There is little consistency between commercial grade footwear brands for determining shoe sizing, and no universally accepted descriptors of common types or features of footwear. The primary aim of this research was to develop a footwear taxonomy about the agreed types of footwear commonly worn by children under the age of six. Secondary aims were to gain consensus of the common footwear features, when different types of footwear would be commonly worn, common terms for key footwear parts, and how movement at some of these footwear parts should be described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Opinions were collected through a three-round modified Delphi international online survey from parents, health professionals, researchers, and footwear industry professionals. The first survey displayed generic pictures about different footwear types and asked participants to provide a grouping term, when the footwear would be worn (for what type of activity) and any grouping features. The second and third rounds presented consensus and gathered agreement on statements. RESULTS: There were 121 participants who provided detailed feedback to open-ended questions. The final round resulted in consensus and agreement on the names of 14 different footwear types, when they are commonly worn and their common features. Participants also reached consensus and agreement on the terms heel counter to describe the back part of footwear and fixtures as the collective term for features allowing footwear adjustability and fastening. They also agreed on terms to quantify the flexibility at footwear sole (bend or twist) or the heel counter. CONCLUSION: This first taxonomy of children’s footwear represents consensus amongst different stakeholders and is an important step in promoting consistency within footwear research. One shoe does not fit all purposes, and the recommendations from this work help to inform the next steps towards ensuring greater transparency and commonality with footwear recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9182301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91823012022-06-10 Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals Williams, Cylie M. Morrison, Stewart C. Paterson, Kade Gobbi, Katherine Burton, Sam Hill, Matthew Harber, Emma Banwell, Helen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: There is little consistency between commercial grade footwear brands for determining shoe sizing, and no universally accepted descriptors of common types or features of footwear. The primary aim of this research was to develop a footwear taxonomy about the agreed types of footwear commonly worn by children under the age of six. Secondary aims were to gain consensus of the common footwear features, when different types of footwear would be commonly worn, common terms for key footwear parts, and how movement at some of these footwear parts should be described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Opinions were collected through a three-round modified Delphi international online survey from parents, health professionals, researchers, and footwear industry professionals. The first survey displayed generic pictures about different footwear types and asked participants to provide a grouping term, when the footwear would be worn (for what type of activity) and any grouping features. The second and third rounds presented consensus and gathered agreement on statements. RESULTS: There were 121 participants who provided detailed feedback to open-ended questions. The final round resulted in consensus and agreement on the names of 14 different footwear types, when they are commonly worn and their common features. Participants also reached consensus and agreement on the terms heel counter to describe the back part of footwear and fixtures as the collective term for features allowing footwear adjustability and fastening. They also agreed on terms to quantify the flexibility at footwear sole (bend or twist) or the heel counter. CONCLUSION: This first taxonomy of children’s footwear represents consensus amongst different stakeholders and is an important step in promoting consistency within footwear research. One shoe does not fit all purposes, and the recommendations from this work help to inform the next steps towards ensuring greater transparency and commonality with footwear recommendations. Public Library of Science 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9182301/ /pubmed/35679289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269223 Text en © 2022 Williams et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Williams, Cylie M. Morrison, Stewart C. Paterson, Kade Gobbi, Katherine Burton, Sam Hill, Matthew Harber, Emma Banwell, Helen Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals |
title | Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals |
title_full | Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals |
title_fullStr | Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals |
title_short | Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals |
title_sort | young children’s footwear taxonomy: an international delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9182301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamscyliem youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals AT morrisonstewartc youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals AT patersonkade youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals AT gobbikatherine youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals AT burtonsam youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals AT hillmatthew youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals AT harberemma youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals AT banwellhelen youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals |