Cargando…

Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals

OBJECTIVE: There is little consistency between commercial grade footwear brands for determining shoe sizing, and no universally accepted descriptors of common types or features of footwear. The primary aim of this research was to develop a footwear taxonomy about the agreed types of footwear commonl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Cylie M., Morrison, Stewart C., Paterson, Kade, Gobbi, Katherine, Burton, Sam, Hill, Matthew, Harber, Emma, Banwell, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9182301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269223
_version_ 1784724001855111168
author Williams, Cylie M.
Morrison, Stewart C.
Paterson, Kade
Gobbi, Katherine
Burton, Sam
Hill, Matthew
Harber, Emma
Banwell, Helen
author_facet Williams, Cylie M.
Morrison, Stewart C.
Paterson, Kade
Gobbi, Katherine
Burton, Sam
Hill, Matthew
Harber, Emma
Banwell, Helen
author_sort Williams, Cylie M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is little consistency between commercial grade footwear brands for determining shoe sizing, and no universally accepted descriptors of common types or features of footwear. The primary aim of this research was to develop a footwear taxonomy about the agreed types of footwear commonly worn by children under the age of six. Secondary aims were to gain consensus of the common footwear features, when different types of footwear would be commonly worn, common terms for key footwear parts, and how movement at some of these footwear parts should be described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Opinions were collected through a three-round modified Delphi international online survey from parents, health professionals, researchers, and footwear industry professionals. The first survey displayed generic pictures about different footwear types and asked participants to provide a grouping term, when the footwear would be worn (for what type of activity) and any grouping features. The second and third rounds presented consensus and gathered agreement on statements. RESULTS: There were 121 participants who provided detailed feedback to open-ended questions. The final round resulted in consensus and agreement on the names of 14 different footwear types, when they are commonly worn and their common features. Participants also reached consensus and agreement on the terms heel counter to describe the back part of footwear and fixtures as the collective term for features allowing footwear adjustability and fastening. They also agreed on terms to quantify the flexibility at footwear sole (bend or twist) or the heel counter. CONCLUSION: This first taxonomy of children’s footwear represents consensus amongst different stakeholders and is an important step in promoting consistency within footwear research. One shoe does not fit all purposes, and the recommendations from this work help to inform the next steps towards ensuring greater transparency and commonality with footwear recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9182301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91823012022-06-10 Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals Williams, Cylie M. Morrison, Stewart C. Paterson, Kade Gobbi, Katherine Burton, Sam Hill, Matthew Harber, Emma Banwell, Helen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: There is little consistency between commercial grade footwear brands for determining shoe sizing, and no universally accepted descriptors of common types or features of footwear. The primary aim of this research was to develop a footwear taxonomy about the agreed types of footwear commonly worn by children under the age of six. Secondary aims were to gain consensus of the common footwear features, when different types of footwear would be commonly worn, common terms for key footwear parts, and how movement at some of these footwear parts should be described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Opinions were collected through a three-round modified Delphi international online survey from parents, health professionals, researchers, and footwear industry professionals. The first survey displayed generic pictures about different footwear types and asked participants to provide a grouping term, when the footwear would be worn (for what type of activity) and any grouping features. The second and third rounds presented consensus and gathered agreement on statements. RESULTS: There were 121 participants who provided detailed feedback to open-ended questions. The final round resulted in consensus and agreement on the names of 14 different footwear types, when they are commonly worn and their common features. Participants also reached consensus and agreement on the terms heel counter to describe the back part of footwear and fixtures as the collective term for features allowing footwear adjustability and fastening. They also agreed on terms to quantify the flexibility at footwear sole (bend or twist) or the heel counter. CONCLUSION: This first taxonomy of children’s footwear represents consensus amongst different stakeholders and is an important step in promoting consistency within footwear research. One shoe does not fit all purposes, and the recommendations from this work help to inform the next steps towards ensuring greater transparency and commonality with footwear recommendations. Public Library of Science 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9182301/ /pubmed/35679289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269223 Text en © 2022 Williams et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Williams, Cylie M.
Morrison, Stewart C.
Paterson, Kade
Gobbi, Katherine
Burton, Sam
Hill, Matthew
Harber, Emma
Banwell, Helen
Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
title Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
title_full Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
title_fullStr Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
title_full_unstemmed Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
title_short Young children’s footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
title_sort young children’s footwear taxonomy: an international delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9182301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269223
work_keys_str_mv AT williamscyliem youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals
AT morrisonstewartc youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals
AT patersonkade youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals
AT gobbikatherine youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals
AT burtonsam youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals
AT hillmatthew youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals
AT harberemma youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals
AT banwellhelen youngchildrensfootweartaxonomyaninternationaldelphisurveyofparentshealthandfootwearindustryprofessionals