Cargando…

Off-Axis and On-Axis Performance of Novel Acrylic Thermoplastic (Elium(®)) 3D Fibre-Reinforced Composites under Flexure Load

The flexure response of novel thermoplastic (Elium(®)) 3D fibre-reinforced composites (FRC) was evaluated and compared with a conventional thermoset (Epolam(®))-based 3D-FRC. Ten different types of sample 3D-FRC were prepared by varying fibre orientations, i.e., 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°, and resin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Hussain, Megat-Yusoff, Puteri S. M., Karuppanan, Saravanan, Choudhry, Rizwan Saeed, Sajid, Zubair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35683898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14112225
Descripción
Sumario:The flexure response of novel thermoplastic (Elium(®)) 3D fibre-reinforced composites (FRC) was evaluated and compared with a conventional thermoset (Epolam(®))-based 3D-FRC. Ten different types of sample 3D-FRC were prepared by varying fibre orientations, i.e., 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°, and resin system, i.e., thermoplastic and thermoset. The bending characteristics and failure mechanisms were determined by conducting a three-point bend test. Results elucidate that the on-axis specimens show linear response and brittle failure; in contrast, the off-axis specimens depicted highly nonlinear response and ductile failure. The thermoplastic on-axis specimen exhibited almost similar flexure strength; in comparison, the off-axis specimens show ~17% lower flexure strength compared to thermoset 3D-FRC. Thermoplastic 3D-FRC shows ~40% higher energy absorption, ~23% lower flexure modulus and ~27% higher flexure strains as compared to its thermoset counterpart.