Cargando…
Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review
Exoskeletons and exosuits have witnessed unprecedented growth in recent years, especially in the medical and industrial sectors. In order to be successfully integrated into the current society, these devices must comply with several commercialization rules and safety standards. Due to their intrinsi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35684614 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22113993 |
_version_ | 1784724201503981568 |
---|---|
author | Massardi, Stefano Rodriguez-Cianca, David Pinto-Fernandez, David Moreno, Juan C. Lancini, Matteo Torricelli, Diego |
author_facet | Massardi, Stefano Rodriguez-Cianca, David Pinto-Fernandez, David Moreno, Juan C. Lancini, Matteo Torricelli, Diego |
author_sort | Massardi, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exoskeletons and exosuits have witnessed unprecedented growth in recent years, especially in the medical and industrial sectors. In order to be successfully integrated into the current society, these devices must comply with several commercialization rules and safety standards. Due to their intrinsic coupling with human limbs, one of the main challenges is to test and prove the quality of physical interaction with humans. However, the study of physical human–exoskeleton interactions (pHEI) has been poorly addressed in the literature. Understanding and identifying the technological ways to assess pHEI is necessary for the future acceptance and large-scale use of these devices. The harmonization of these evaluation processes represents a key factor in building a still missing accepted framework to inform human–device contact safety. In this review, we identify, analyze, and discuss the metrics, testing procedures, and measurement devices used to assess pHEI in the last ten years. Furthermore, we discuss the role of pHEI in safety contact evaluation. We found a very heterogeneous panorama in terms of sensors and testing methods, which are still far from considering realistic conditions and use-cases. We identified the main gaps and drawbacks of current approaches, pointing towards a number of promising research directions. This review aspires to help the wearable robotics community find agreements on interaction quality and safety assessment testing procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9183080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91830802022-06-10 Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review Massardi, Stefano Rodriguez-Cianca, David Pinto-Fernandez, David Moreno, Juan C. Lancini, Matteo Torricelli, Diego Sensors (Basel) Review Exoskeletons and exosuits have witnessed unprecedented growth in recent years, especially in the medical and industrial sectors. In order to be successfully integrated into the current society, these devices must comply with several commercialization rules and safety standards. Due to their intrinsic coupling with human limbs, one of the main challenges is to test and prove the quality of physical interaction with humans. However, the study of physical human–exoskeleton interactions (pHEI) has been poorly addressed in the literature. Understanding and identifying the technological ways to assess pHEI is necessary for the future acceptance and large-scale use of these devices. The harmonization of these evaluation processes represents a key factor in building a still missing accepted framework to inform human–device contact safety. In this review, we identify, analyze, and discuss the metrics, testing procedures, and measurement devices used to assess pHEI in the last ten years. Furthermore, we discuss the role of pHEI in safety contact evaluation. We found a very heterogeneous panorama in terms of sensors and testing methods, which are still far from considering realistic conditions and use-cases. We identified the main gaps and drawbacks of current approaches, pointing towards a number of promising research directions. This review aspires to help the wearable robotics community find agreements on interaction quality and safety assessment testing procedures. MDPI 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9183080/ /pubmed/35684614 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22113993 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Massardi, Stefano Rodriguez-Cianca, David Pinto-Fernandez, David Moreno, Juan C. Lancini, Matteo Torricelli, Diego Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review |
title | Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review |
title_full | Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review |
title_fullStr | Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review |
title_short | Characterization and Evaluation of Human–Exoskeleton Interaction Dynamics: A Review |
title_sort | characterization and evaluation of human–exoskeleton interaction dynamics: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35684614 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22113993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT massardistefano characterizationandevaluationofhumanexoskeletoninteractiondynamicsareview AT rodriguezciancadavid characterizationandevaluationofhumanexoskeletoninteractiondynamicsareview AT pintofernandezdavid characterizationandevaluationofhumanexoskeletoninteractiondynamicsareview AT morenojuanc characterizationandevaluationofhumanexoskeletoninteractiondynamicsareview AT lancinimatteo characterizationandevaluationofhumanexoskeletoninteractiondynamicsareview AT torricellidiego characterizationandevaluationofhumanexoskeletoninteractiondynamicsareview |