Cargando…
Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
Recent technological advances have helped scientists understand early human development. However, scientists’ ability to fully explore their potential comes in conflict with national and state-level policies in the USA. In 2016, for the first time, researchers were able to grow human embryos in cult...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac014 |
_version_ | 1784724367778775040 |
---|---|
author | Matthews, Kirstin R W Morali, Daniel |
author_facet | Matthews, Kirstin R W Morali, Daniel |
author_sort | Matthews, Kirstin R W |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent technological advances have helped scientists understand early human development. However, scientists’ ability to fully explore their potential comes in conflict with national and state-level policies in the USA. In 2016, for the first time, researchers were able to grow human embryos in culture up to 14 days but stopped because of scientific and legal limits. Other researchers have used stem cells in culture to create organized models of early human development, known as embryoids or cell-based embryo models. In this paper, we review federal and state laws that affect US human embryo and embryoid research. While federal policies focus on funding, state laws are often associated with human embryonic stem cells, abortion, fetal tissue research, and reproductive cloning. Of the 29 states with laws impacting human embryo research, only 11 states ban it, and none address embryoids directly, although five states limit aspects of this research. Overall, this complicated landscape suggests that additional national guidance would help scientists and the public navigate these controversial areas of research, however, it is unlikely to happen, considering the lack of past progress determining embryo research policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9183789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91837892022-06-10 Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research Matthews, Kirstin R W Morali, Daniel J Law Biosci Original Article Recent technological advances have helped scientists understand early human development. However, scientists’ ability to fully explore their potential comes in conflict with national and state-level policies in the USA. In 2016, for the first time, researchers were able to grow human embryos in culture up to 14 days but stopped because of scientific and legal limits. Other researchers have used stem cells in culture to create organized models of early human development, known as embryoids or cell-based embryo models. In this paper, we review federal and state laws that affect US human embryo and embryoid research. While federal policies focus on funding, state laws are often associated with human embryonic stem cells, abortion, fetal tissue research, and reproductive cloning. Of the 29 states with laws impacting human embryo research, only 11 states ban it, and none address embryoids directly, although five states limit aspects of this research. Overall, this complicated landscape suggests that additional national guidance would help scientists and the public navigate these controversial areas of research, however, it is unlikely to happen, considering the lack of past progress determining embryo research policy. Oxford University Press 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9183789/ /pubmed/35692936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac014 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Matthews, Kirstin R W Morali, Daniel Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research |
title | Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research |
title_full | Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research |
title_fullStr | Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research |
title_full_unstemmed | Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research |
title_short | Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research |
title_sort | can we do that here? an analysis of us federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matthewskirstinrw canwedothathereananalysisofusfederalandstatepoliciesguidinghumanembryoandembryoidresearch AT moralidaniel canwedothathereananalysisofusfederalandstatepoliciesguidinghumanembryoandembryoidresearch |