Cargando…

Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research

Recent technological advances have helped scientists understand early human development. However, scientists’ ability to fully explore their potential comes in conflict with national and state-level policies in the USA. In 2016, for the first time, researchers were able to grow human embryos in cult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Kirstin R W, Morali, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac014
_version_ 1784724367778775040
author Matthews, Kirstin R W
Morali, Daniel
author_facet Matthews, Kirstin R W
Morali, Daniel
author_sort Matthews, Kirstin R W
collection PubMed
description Recent technological advances have helped scientists understand early human development. However, scientists’ ability to fully explore their potential comes in conflict with national and state-level policies in the USA. In 2016, for the first time, researchers were able to grow human embryos in culture up to 14 days but stopped because of scientific and legal limits. Other researchers have used stem cells in culture to create organized models of early human development, known as embryoids or cell-based embryo models. In this paper, we review federal and state laws that affect US human embryo and embryoid research. While federal policies focus on funding, state laws are often associated with human embryonic stem cells, abortion, fetal tissue research, and reproductive cloning. Of the 29 states with laws impacting human embryo research, only 11 states ban it, and none address embryoids directly, although five states limit aspects of this research. Overall, this complicated landscape suggests that additional national guidance would help scientists and the public navigate these controversial areas of research, however, it is unlikely to happen, considering the lack of past progress determining embryo research policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9183789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91837892022-06-10 Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research Matthews, Kirstin R W Morali, Daniel J Law Biosci Original Article Recent technological advances have helped scientists understand early human development. However, scientists’ ability to fully explore their potential comes in conflict with national and state-level policies in the USA. In 2016, for the first time, researchers were able to grow human embryos in culture up to 14 days but stopped because of scientific and legal limits. Other researchers have used stem cells in culture to create organized models of early human development, known as embryoids or cell-based embryo models. In this paper, we review federal and state laws that affect US human embryo and embryoid research. While federal policies focus on funding, state laws are often associated with human embryonic stem cells, abortion, fetal tissue research, and reproductive cloning. Of the 29 states with laws impacting human embryo research, only 11 states ban it, and none address embryoids directly, although five states limit aspects of this research. Overall, this complicated landscape suggests that additional national guidance would help scientists and the public navigate these controversial areas of research, however, it is unlikely to happen, considering the lack of past progress determining embryo research policy. Oxford University Press 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9183789/ /pubmed/35692936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac014 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Matthews, Kirstin R W
Morali, Daniel
Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
title Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
title_full Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
title_fullStr Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
title_full_unstemmed Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
title_short Can we do that here? An analysis of US federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
title_sort can we do that here? an analysis of us federal and state policies guiding human embryo and embryoid research
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9183789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac014
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewskirstinrw canwedothathereananalysisofusfederalandstatepoliciesguidinghumanembryoandembryoidresearch
AT moralidaniel canwedothathereananalysisofusfederalandstatepoliciesguidinghumanembryoandembryoidresearch