Cargando…
Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial
BACKGROUND: In the phase 2, randomized, double-blind STRIVE trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). The objective of this p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00465-7 |
_version_ | 1784724475591262208 |
---|---|
author | Penson, David F. Armstrong, Andrew J. Concepcion, Raoul S. Agarwal, Neeraj Olsson, Carl A. Karsh, Lawrence I. Dunshee, Curtis J. Duggan, William Shen, Qi Sugg, Jennifer Haas, Gabriel P. Higano, Celestia S. |
author_facet | Penson, David F. Armstrong, Andrew J. Concepcion, Raoul S. Agarwal, Neeraj Olsson, Carl A. Karsh, Lawrence I. Dunshee, Curtis J. Duggan, William Shen, Qi Sugg, Jennifer Haas, Gabriel P. Higano, Celestia S. |
author_sort | Penson, David F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the phase 2, randomized, double-blind STRIVE trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). The objective of this protocol-specified subgroup analysis of STRIVE was to investigate the benefit of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide specifically in patients with nmCRPC. METHODS: Patients (N = 139) were stratified by disease stage and randomized to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; n = 70) or bicalutamide 50 mg/day plus ADT (n = 69). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with nmCRPC were comparable between groups. At a median of 17 months follow-up, enzalutamide reduced the risk of progression or death by 76% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI 0.14–0.42). Enzalutamide reduced risk of prostate-specific antigen progression by 82% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (HR, 0.18; 95% CI 0.10–0.34). The most frequently reported adverse events by patients receiving enzalutamide were fatigue (36.2%), hot flush (20.3%), decreased appetite (17.4%), dizziness (17.4%), and nausea (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This STRIVE subgroup analysis of patients with nmCRPC illustrates the benefit of enzalutamide in reducing the risk of progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01664923. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9184266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91842662022-06-11 Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial Penson, David F. Armstrong, Andrew J. Concepcion, Raoul S. Agarwal, Neeraj Olsson, Carl A. Karsh, Lawrence I. Dunshee, Curtis J. Duggan, William Shen, Qi Sugg, Jennifer Haas, Gabriel P. Higano, Celestia S. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Brief Communication BACKGROUND: In the phase 2, randomized, double-blind STRIVE trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). The objective of this protocol-specified subgroup analysis of STRIVE was to investigate the benefit of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide specifically in patients with nmCRPC. METHODS: Patients (N = 139) were stratified by disease stage and randomized to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; n = 70) or bicalutamide 50 mg/day plus ADT (n = 69). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with nmCRPC were comparable between groups. At a median of 17 months follow-up, enzalutamide reduced the risk of progression or death by 76% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI 0.14–0.42). Enzalutamide reduced risk of prostate-specific antigen progression by 82% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (HR, 0.18; 95% CI 0.10–0.34). The most frequently reported adverse events by patients receiving enzalutamide were fatigue (36.2%), hot flush (20.3%), decreased appetite (17.4%), dizziness (17.4%), and nausea (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This STRIVE subgroup analysis of patients with nmCRPC illustrates the benefit of enzalutamide in reducing the risk of progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01664923. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9184266/ /pubmed/34621011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00465-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Penson, David F. Armstrong, Andrew J. Concepcion, Raoul S. Agarwal, Neeraj Olsson, Carl A. Karsh, Lawrence I. Dunshee, Curtis J. Duggan, William Shen, Qi Sugg, Jennifer Haas, Gabriel P. Higano, Celestia S. Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial |
title | Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial |
title_full | Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial |
title_fullStr | Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial |
title_short | Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial |
title_sort | enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the strive trial |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00465-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pensondavidf enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT armstrongandrewj enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT concepcionraouls enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT agarwalneeraj enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT olssoncarla enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT karshlawrencei enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT dunsheecurtisj enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT dugganwilliam enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT shenqi enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT suggjennifer enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT haasgabrielp enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial AT higanocelestias enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial |