Cargando…

Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial

BACKGROUND: In the phase 2, randomized, double-blind STRIVE trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). The objective of this p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penson, David F., Armstrong, Andrew J., Concepcion, Raoul S., Agarwal, Neeraj, Olsson, Carl A., Karsh, Lawrence I., Dunshee, Curtis J., Duggan, William, Shen, Qi, Sugg, Jennifer, Haas, Gabriel P., Higano, Celestia S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00465-7
_version_ 1784724475591262208
author Penson, David F.
Armstrong, Andrew J.
Concepcion, Raoul S.
Agarwal, Neeraj
Olsson, Carl A.
Karsh, Lawrence I.
Dunshee, Curtis J.
Duggan, William
Shen, Qi
Sugg, Jennifer
Haas, Gabriel P.
Higano, Celestia S.
author_facet Penson, David F.
Armstrong, Andrew J.
Concepcion, Raoul S.
Agarwal, Neeraj
Olsson, Carl A.
Karsh, Lawrence I.
Dunshee, Curtis J.
Duggan, William
Shen, Qi
Sugg, Jennifer
Haas, Gabriel P.
Higano, Celestia S.
author_sort Penson, David F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the phase 2, randomized, double-blind STRIVE trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). The objective of this protocol-specified subgroup analysis of STRIVE was to investigate the benefit of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide specifically in patients with nmCRPC. METHODS: Patients (N = 139) were stratified by disease stage and randomized to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; n = 70) or bicalutamide 50 mg/day plus ADT (n = 69). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with nmCRPC were comparable between groups. At a median of 17 months follow-up, enzalutamide reduced the risk of progression or death by 76% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI 0.14–0.42). Enzalutamide reduced risk of prostate-specific antigen progression by 82% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (HR, 0.18; 95% CI 0.10–0.34). The most frequently reported adverse events by patients receiving enzalutamide were fatigue (36.2%), hot flush (20.3%), decreased appetite (17.4%), dizziness (17.4%), and nausea (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This STRIVE subgroup analysis of patients with nmCRPC illustrates the benefit of enzalutamide in reducing the risk of progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01664923.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9184266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91842662022-06-11 Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial Penson, David F. Armstrong, Andrew J. Concepcion, Raoul S. Agarwal, Neeraj Olsson, Carl A. Karsh, Lawrence I. Dunshee, Curtis J. Duggan, William Shen, Qi Sugg, Jennifer Haas, Gabriel P. Higano, Celestia S. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Brief Communication BACKGROUND: In the phase 2, randomized, double-blind STRIVE trial, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). The objective of this protocol-specified subgroup analysis of STRIVE was to investigate the benefit of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide specifically in patients with nmCRPC. METHODS: Patients (N = 139) were stratified by disease stage and randomized to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; n = 70) or bicalutamide 50 mg/day plus ADT (n = 69). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients with nmCRPC were comparable between groups. At a median of 17 months follow-up, enzalutamide reduced the risk of progression or death by 76% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI 0.14–0.42). Enzalutamide reduced risk of prostate-specific antigen progression by 82% versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC (HR, 0.18; 95% CI 0.10–0.34). The most frequently reported adverse events by patients receiving enzalutamide were fatigue (36.2%), hot flush (20.3%), decreased appetite (17.4%), dizziness (17.4%), and nausea (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This STRIVE subgroup analysis of patients with nmCRPC illustrates the benefit of enzalutamide in reducing the risk of progression or death versus bicalutamide in patients with nmCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01664923. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9184266/ /pubmed/34621011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00465-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Penson, David F.
Armstrong, Andrew J.
Concepcion, Raoul S.
Agarwal, Neeraj
Olsson, Carl A.
Karsh, Lawrence I.
Dunshee, Curtis J.
Duggan, William
Shen, Qi
Sugg, Jennifer
Haas, Gabriel P.
Higano, Celestia S.
Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial
title Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial
title_full Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial
title_fullStr Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial
title_full_unstemmed Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial
title_short Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the STRIVE trial
title_sort enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the strive trial
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00465-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pensondavidf enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT armstrongandrewj enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT concepcionraouls enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT agarwalneeraj enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT olssoncarla enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT karshlawrencei enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT dunsheecurtisj enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT dugganwilliam enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT shenqi enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT suggjennifer enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT haasgabrielp enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial
AT higanocelestias enzalutamideversusbicalutamideinpatientswithnonmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecanceraprespecifiedsubgroupanalysisofthestrivetrial