Cargando…

The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Binding of (18)F-DCFPyL at prostate cancer (PC) cells increases over time. The dual-phase protocol may be helpful in separating benign lesions from malignant ones associated with prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the incremental diagnostic value of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Aijuan, Lin, Runlong, Yu, Jing, Zhang, Fan, Zheng, Qiang, Yuan, Xin, Sun, Zhanhua, Zhong, Zhaoyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00534-5
_version_ 1784724477347627008
author Tian, Aijuan
Lin, Runlong
Yu, Jing
Zhang, Fan
Zheng, Qiang
Yuan, Xin
Sun, Zhanhua
Zhong, Zhaoyan
author_facet Tian, Aijuan
Lin, Runlong
Yu, Jing
Zhang, Fan
Zheng, Qiang
Yuan, Xin
Sun, Zhanhua
Zhong, Zhaoyan
author_sort Tian, Aijuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Binding of (18)F-DCFPyL at prostate cancer (PC) cells increases over time. The dual-phase protocol may be helpful in separating benign lesions from malignant ones associated with prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the incremental diagnostic value of (18)F-DCFPyL dual-time imaging in patients with prostate cancer. METHOD: 114 prostate-related malignant lesions and 43 benign lesions in 38 patients with prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for benign and prostate-related malignant lesions were calculated at min 60 and min 120 of PET/CT imaging. In order to calculate SUV ratio, the SUVmax of left gluteus maximus was measured at the same time. The difference of SUVmax metrics and SUV ratio between malignant and benign lesions was statistically analyzed, the cut-off value of ROC curve was calculated, and the diagnostic efficacy of SUVmax index and SUV ratio at two time points was compared. RESULTS: SUVmax metrics and SUV ratio of early and delayed imaging of PC-related malignant lesions were significantly higher than those of benign lesions (p < 0.05). In terms of individual indicators, the highest accuracy and sensitivity was in the delayed SUV ratio (89.2% and 94.7%), the best specificity was in the early SUVmax (93.0%). When the individual and combined indicators were compared together, the SUV ratio in the delay period still showed the best diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, and the best specificity were SUVmax early and ▵SUVmax, SUVmax early and RI. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of (18)F-DCFPyL increased over time in prostate-associated malignant lesions compared with benign tissue. For single-phase imaging, 2-hour (delayed) imaging has better diagnostic performance. However, the dual-phase imaging (1 and 2 h) are helpful in the differential diagnosis of prostate-associated malignant lesions and benign lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9184273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91842732022-06-11 The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma Tian, Aijuan Lin, Runlong Yu, Jing Zhang, Fan Zheng, Qiang Yuan, Xin Sun, Zhanhua Zhong, Zhaoyan Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article OBJECTIVE: Binding of (18)F-DCFPyL at prostate cancer (PC) cells increases over time. The dual-phase protocol may be helpful in separating benign lesions from malignant ones associated with prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the incremental diagnostic value of (18)F-DCFPyL dual-time imaging in patients with prostate cancer. METHOD: 114 prostate-related malignant lesions and 43 benign lesions in 38 patients with prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for benign and prostate-related malignant lesions were calculated at min 60 and min 120 of PET/CT imaging. In order to calculate SUV ratio, the SUVmax of left gluteus maximus was measured at the same time. The difference of SUVmax metrics and SUV ratio between malignant and benign lesions was statistically analyzed, the cut-off value of ROC curve was calculated, and the diagnostic efficacy of SUVmax index and SUV ratio at two time points was compared. RESULTS: SUVmax metrics and SUV ratio of early and delayed imaging of PC-related malignant lesions were significantly higher than those of benign lesions (p < 0.05). In terms of individual indicators, the highest accuracy and sensitivity was in the delayed SUV ratio (89.2% and 94.7%), the best specificity was in the early SUVmax (93.0%). When the individual and combined indicators were compared together, the SUV ratio in the delay period still showed the best diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy, and the best specificity were SUVmax early and ▵SUVmax, SUVmax early and RI. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of (18)F-DCFPyL increased over time in prostate-associated malignant lesions compared with benign tissue. For single-phase imaging, 2-hour (delayed) imaging has better diagnostic performance. However, the dual-phase imaging (1 and 2 h) are helpful in the differential diagnosis of prostate-associated malignant lesions and benign lesions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9184273/ /pubmed/35422099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00534-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Tian, Aijuan
Lin, Runlong
Yu, Jing
Zhang, Fan
Zheng, Qiang
Yuan, Xin
Sun, Zhanhua
Zhong, Zhaoyan
The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma
title The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma
title_full The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma
title_fullStr The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma
title_short The differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)F-DCFPyL PET/CT in prostate carcinoma
title_sort differential diagnostic value of dual-phase (18)f-dcfpyl pet/ct in prostate carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00534-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tianaijuan thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT linrunlong thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT yujing thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT zhangfan thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT zhengqiang thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT yuanxin thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT sunzhanhua thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT zhongzhaoyan thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT tianaijuan differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT linrunlong differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT yujing differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT zhangfan differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT zhengqiang differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT yuanxin differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT sunzhanhua differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma
AT zhongzhaoyan differentialdiagnosticvalueofdualphase18fdcfpylpetctinprostatecarcinoma